...admissible. Rule 403. Exclusion of Relevant Evidence on Grounds of Prejudice, Confusion, or Waste of Time Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its...danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of...

...ICTY Ruies 89(C) and (D) in fact mirrors Rule 403 of the US Federal Rules of Evidence which reads: 'Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its...danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of...

...according to Rule 401, it can still be excluded from consideration on other grounds. According to Rule 403, relevant evidence may be excluded "if its probative...danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of...

...is one category of information that falls within this discretionary watchdog power.51 Demonstrative evidence "may be excluded if its probative value is...danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of...

...admitted. Irrelevant, immaterial, and unreliable evidence shall be excluded. Evidence, even if relevant, may be excluded if its probative value is substantially...danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or if the evidence would be misleading, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time or needless...

...Inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 403 Federal Rule of Evidence 403 provides, in pertinent part: Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its...outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, or misleading the jury. Preventable Accident Determinations 377 Introduction of a safety review...