...Corp., 301 US 1, which is the parent of the National Labor Relations Act cases, the Court said: ' ' The authority of the Federal Government may not be...the several States' and the internal concerns of a State. That distinction between what is national and what is local in the activities of commerce is...

...here. One of them is the Labor Board v. Jones & McLaugklin (301 US 29, 30) , in which the court said : The authority of the Federal Government may not be...among the several States and the internal concerns of the State. That distinction between what is national and what is local In the activities of its commerce...

...here. One of them is the Labor Board v. Jones & McLaughlin (301 US 29, 30) , in which the court said : The authority of the Federal Government may not be...among the several States and the internal concerns of the State. That distinction between what is national and what is local in the activities of its commerce...

...flow in interstate commerce had ceised. The poultry had come to a permanent rest within the State. But the authority of the federal government may not be...the several States" and the internal concerns of a State (Id., 550). The Government next pressed the contention that even if Schechter's handlings of...

...flow in interstate commerce had ceised. The poultry had come to a permanent rest within the State. But the authority of the federal government may not be pushed to such an extreme as to destroy ihe distinction, which the commerce clause itself establishes, between commerce "among the several...

...However, I commend to the committee the statement of Chief Justice Hughes in NLRB v. Jones & J^aughlin Steel Corp., 301 US at page 30 : The authority of...the several States" and the internal concerns of a State. That distinction between what is national and what is local in the activities of commerce is...

...v. Jones d- Lav-ghtin Steel Corp., 301 US 1, 30, 81 L. Ed. 893, 907 (1936), in this language: * * * The authority of the Federal government may not be pushed to such an Mtreme as to destroy the distinction, which the commerce clause Itself establishes, between commerce...

...welfare, and where the local interests thereby served outweigh the interstate or national interests. "The authority of the Federal Government may not be pushed to such an extent as to destroy the distinction, which the Commerce Clause itself establishes, between commerce...

...welfare, and where the local interests thereby served outweigh the interstate or national interests. "The authority of the Federal Government may not be pushed to such an extent as to destroy the distinction, which the Commerce Clause itself establishes, between commerce...

...well as because of the explicit reservation of the Tenth Amendment." Id. at 29-3C . The Court said: "The authority of the Federal government may not be...the several States' and the internal concerns of a State. That distinction between what is national and what is local in the activities of commerce is...