| Transatlantic Policy Consortium. Annual Colloquium - Political Science - 2006 - 494 pages
...(2-4) - War against terrorists of global reach which is different from any other war in history (5) - Stop rogue states and their terrorist clients before they are able to threaten or use WMDs (14) -Other security threats include regional conflicts, drug trafficking in Latin America, and... | |
| 268 pages
...pursuit of, and trade in, [weapons of mass destruction have] become a looming threat to all nations. We must be prepared to stop rogue states and their terrorist clients before they . . . threaten or use weapons of mass destruction against the United States. . . . [T]he United States... | |
| Robert G. Kaufman - Political Science - 2007 - 263 pages
...These states' pursuit of, and global trade in, such weapons has become a looming threat to all nations. We must be prepared to stop rogue states and their...against the United States and our allies and friends. Our response must take full advantage of strengthened alliances, the establishment of new partnerships... | |
| Simon Shen - China - 2007 - 254 pages
...harshly those who saw this coming danger but failed to act."14 The NSS introduced the idea of preemption. "We must be prepared to stop rogue states and their...against the United States and our allies and friends ... The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction - and the more compelling the case... | |
| Saul Landau - Political Science - 2007 - 324 pages
...exhibits these traits and "some indications of paranoia." She selected as an example Bush's declaration: "We must be prepared to stop rogue states and their...against the United States and our allies and friends." Such a statement indicated "projection is evidenced here as well, projection of the fact that we are... | |
| Norman E. Bowie, Robert L. Simon - Philosophy - 2008 - 294 pages
...advanced in a number of documents and speeches. The core idea is that the United States should be able to "stop rogue states and their terrorist clients...against the United States and our allies and friends." This implies that action can be legitimate "against such emerging threats before they are fully formed."39... | |
| Adam Hodges, Chad Nilep - Language Arts & Disciplines - 2007 - 272 pages
...enemies from threatening us, our allies, and our friends with weapons of mass destruction (6-7). (13) We must be prepared to stop rogue states and their...threaten or use weapons of mass destruction against the US or our allies and friends (21). Through the extensive use of nominalization the NSS mystifies the... | |
| Jonathan Schell - History - 2007 - 270 pages
...Strategy of the United States of America, of global American military hegemony. That document had stated, "We must be prepared to stop rogue states and their...able to threaten or use weapons of mass destruction," and "to forestall or prevent such hostile acts . . . the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively."... | |
| Simon Serfaty - Political Science - 2007 - 206 pages
...administration pledged "to act preemptively" before "rogue states and their terrorist clients . . . are able to threaten or use weapons of mass destruction against the United States and our allies and friends."4' In so doing, the Bush administration viewed the "thirteen-day crisis" as a model, or at... | |
| David Mutimer - Political Science - 2008 - 337 pages
...Strategy of the United States, which emphasized the need for pre-emptive action against terrorist threats: 'We must be prepared to stop rogue states and their...against the United States, and our allies and friends ... The greater the threat, the greater is the risk for inaction, and the more compelling the case... | |
| |