| United States. Congress. Senate. Government Operations - 1973 - 1172 pages
...protected by the Constitution ... in such cases, the duty and responsibility grow out of and are sn!>ject to the control of the law, and not to the direction...executed, implies a power to forbid their execution, in a novel construction of the Constitution, and entirely inadmissable. This is a decision of the US... | |
| United States. Congress. House Rules - 1973 - 330 pages
...appears that Kendall bears directly on the issue of impoundment. The Court, for instance, declares : "To contend, that the obligation imposed on the President...novel construction of the constitution, and entirely inadmissible."18 Also to the point, apparently, is the Court's conclusion that it is "an alarming doctrine,... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Rules - Legislative hearings - 1973 - 958 pages
...appears that Kendall bears directly on the issue of impoundment. The Court, for instance, declares: "To contend, that the obligation imposed on the President...novel construction of the constitution, and entirely inadmissible."' 1 " Also to the point, apparently, is the Court's conclusion that it is "an alarming... | |
| United States. Congress. Joint Committee on Congressional Operations - 1973 - 622 pages
...Supreme Court asserted in Kendall v. United States that : "To contend that the obligation imposed upon the president to see the laws faithfully executed...novel construction of the Constitution, and entirely inadmissible." A congressional request for information is too important to be blocked even by ti refusal... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Government Operations Committee - 1974 - 88 pages
...a power entirely to control the legislation of congress and paralyze the administration of just1ce. To contend that the obligation imposed on the president...novel construction of the constitution, and entirely inadmissible.24 It has been pointed out that Kendall involved a claim for services rendered, whereas... | |
| |