 This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons or property without reward : neither...  The Quarterly Journal of Economics - Page 324edited by - 1895Full view - About this book
 | Frank Hendrick - Antitrust law - 1906 - 604 pages
..."It is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights the State cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1906 - 786 pages
...it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | Harrison Standish Smalley - Railroads - 1906 - 184 pages
...said it is not to be inferred that this form of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freight, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | Leslie Jay Tompkins - Corporation law - 1908 - 1188 pages
...tolls and charges, that limitations have been found, beyond which the police power cannor go. " This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | Virginia State Bar Association - Bar associations - 1909 - 428 pages
...it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights the State cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | Joseph Asbury Joyce - Corporation law - 1909 - 1272 pages
...Protection of Laws. — The legislative power of limitation or regulation of rates is restricted. "This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and rates, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to carry... | |
 | University of North Dakota - 1912 - 438 pages
...it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | Law - 1911 - 1024 pages
...1886) that " It is not to be inferred that this power limitation or regulation is itself without limit. The power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation.'' But where and by what rule the limit is to be drawn beyond which regulation amounts to a denial of... | |
 | Bruce Wyman - Public utilities - 1911 - 854 pages
...established: "It is not inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation." The rule was not yet finally settled, however. In Dow v. Beidelman 2 the court declined to enter upon... | |
 | Hannis Taylor - Constitutional history - 1911 - 738 pages
...away, if at all, by words of positive grant, or their equivalent. It was said, however, that "this power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
| |
