 | Jason D. Ellis, Geoffrey D. Kiefer - History - 2004 - 338 pages
...the president declared in his January 2002 State of the Union Address that the United States could "not permit the world's most dangerous regimes to...threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons," a charge that brought WMD proliferation within the scope of the counterterrorism campaign, centered... | |
 | Richard Jackson - Political Science - 2005 - 244 pages
...[Applause.] And all nations should know: America will do what is necessary to ensure our nation's security. We'll be deliberate. yet time is not on our side....threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons. [Applause.] Our war on terror is well begun. but it is only begun. This campaign may not be finished... | |
 | Patrick J. Buchanan - Political Science - 2007 - 272 pages
...Iraq, and North Korea by name as an "axis of evil" and delivering virtual ultimatums to all three: We'll be deliberate, yet time is not on our side....threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons. With this threat, President Bush stunned many who had supported his leadership. What did Iran, Iraq,... | |
 | Tom De Luca, John Buell - Political Science - 2005 - 228 pages
...develop and deploy effective missile defenses to protect America and our allies from sudden attack. . . . We'll be deliberate, yet time is not on our side....threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons. Our war on terror is well begun, but it is only begun. This campaign may not be finished on our watch—yet... | |
 | John W. Dietrich - History - 2005 - 342 pages
...attack. And all nations should know: America will do what is necessary to ensure our nation's security. We'll be deliberate, yet time is not on our side....threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons. Our war on terror is well begun, but it is only begun. This campaign may not be finished on our watch... | |
 | James W. Ceaser, Andrew Busch - Political Science - 2005 - 218 pages
...danger. They could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match their hatred. . . . We'll be deliberate, yet time is not on our side....threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons. This warning was followed up by a speech at West Point in June, when Bush declared that "if we wait... | |
 | Richard A. Melanson - United States - 2005 - 436 pages
...peace of the world. . . . They could attack our allies or attempt to blackmail the United States. . . . We'll be deliberate, yet time is not on our side....regimes to threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons.44 Bush's assertion that Iraq, Iran, and North Korea constituted a triple threat to America,... | |
 | Robert J. Lieber - Political Science - 2005 - 284 pages
...seek chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons from threatening the United States and the world — Yet time is not on our side. I will not wait on events...threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons. 10 Two elements were crucial to the doctrine. The first was a sense of urgency, reflected in the words... | |
 | Robert J. Lieber - History - 2005 - 276 pages
...seek chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons from threatening the United States and the world — Yet time is not on our side. I will not wait on events...regimes to threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons.10 Two elements were crucial to the doctrine. The first was a sense of urgency, reflected in... | |
 | John Podhoretz - Biography & Autobiography - 2005 - 306 pages
...weaponry against us. "We'll be deliberate, yet time is not on our side," Bush said in January 2002. "I will not wait on events while dangers gather. I...threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons." He was about to take his next visionary step — and the uncontroversial war on terror was about to... | |
| |
The United States of America will not permit the world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons. 
