| Steven Lubet - Trial practice - 2004 - 616 pages
...will usually be admitted. 52. Rule 403, Federal Rules of Evidence, provides an exception: "Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative...danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of... | |
| Robert J. McCaffrey, Arthur D. Williams, Jerid M. Fisher, Linda C. Laing - Medical - 2004 - 248 pages
...general provisions of Rule 403 give the courts the power of discretionary exclusion. It reads, "Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative...danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of... | |
| Richard A. Posner - Business & Economics - 2004 - 474 pages
...401). The rules make relevant evidence admissible and irrelevant evidence inadmissible (Rule 402), but relevant evidence may be excluded "if its probative...danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of... | |
| Richard C. Dart - Medical - 2004 - 1990 pages
...cross-examination by each party, including a party calling the witness." FRE 403 provides, "although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative...danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of... | |
| D. Larry Crumbley, Rezaee Zabihollah - Business & Economics - 2004 - 980 pages
...403: Exclusion of Relevant Evidence on Grounds of Prejudice, Confusion, or Waste of Time. Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative...danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of... | |
| Liza H. Gold - Medical - 2008 - 316 pages
...under Federal Rule of Evidence 403 (Slovenko 1988). This rule states that evidence, even if relevant, may be excluded if its probative value is substantially...danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, among other considerations. For example, in Bushell v. Dean (1989), a Texas appellate... | |
| Paul R. Rice - Law - 2005 - 420 pages
...however, is not always apparent. I8() 177. This is the standard delineated in Fed. R. Evid. 403. Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative...danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of... | |
| Robert McGee - Business & Economics - 2005 - 436 pages
...supra note 50, at 660 n.42 and accompanying text. " Id. Federal Rule of Evidence 403 provides: Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative...danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of... | |
| Roger J. R. Levesque - Criminal justice, Administration of - 2006 - 746 pages
...Rule 403. Exclusion of Relevant Evidence on Grounds of Prejudice, Confusion, or Waste of Time Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative...danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of... | |
| Douglas Walton - Philosophy - 2006 - 368 pages
...relevant according to the legal criterion of relevant evidence. The Primary Exclusion Rule Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative...danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of... | |
| |