Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

Civilian personnel paid from nonappropriated funds, utilization of__
Communications

Corpus Christi, Tex., NAS, inactivation of overhaul and repair depart-
ment of____

686

532

743

634

[blocks in formation]

Installations, major changes in.

638

761

727

Increased efficiency and economy, achievement of.

Limited war. (See this title, this index.)

Major forces, summary of___.

Major program reductions and cancellations, summary of

Major procurement-----

Manpower data processing systems, savings from__.

998

502, 553

17

501

474

533

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Retired officers, employment by firms doing defense business__.

Soviet :

Air defense capability.

Aircraft strength

S

Attack, possibility during next 5 years_
Bomber forces, estimate of....

Carriers, Soviet concern for United States..

15, 87 14, 15 117

105, 354, 382

939

810

13

430

393

12

13, 139, 34S

429

213

13

13, 601, 701

193, 959

216

150 18,36

20 18,38

570

viet-Continued

Equipment, quality of___

Ground forces, strength of__.

Industrial and economic fields, challenge in----.

Missiles:

ICBM's:

Accuracy of....

Superiority of..

Intelligence on, adequacy of

IRBM's, status of___

Production and capabilities_
Reconnaissance of..

Strength---

Submarine forces__.

Submarine program, cutback in_.
Submarine threat___.

Surface fleet, quality of.
Threat to United States_.

ock funds, transfers from_.

370

32, 34, 68, 297

195

895

1, 115, 983 878, 884, 887 840, 890

40, 42, 51, 54, 58, 60, 149, 174, 183

887

18, 32, 34, 36, 38, 190, 297, 659

rength to deter war, sufficiency of United States__ irprise attack, capability to defend against_

35, 69 546, 614 69, 757 586 20, 659 172

48, 71, 96

71

DEPARTMENT OF

DEFENSE

APPROPRIATIONS FOR 1960

HEARINGS

BEFORE THE

SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

EIGHTY-SIXTH CONGRESS

FIRST SESSION

SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS
GEORGE H. MAHON, Texas, Chairman

[blocks in formation]
« PreviousContinue »