TAXES Continued
INCOME TAX-Continued
CORPORATIONS-Continued
Associations taxable as corporations—Continued
Trusts as associations-Continued
the association was not a corporation for tax purposes. Cebrian, 357.
Internal Revenue 815
Exemption from taxation.
A claim for exemption from Federal taxation must be clearly made out. New Jersey Automobile Club, 344.
Section 101 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 provides for exemption from taxation for a number of specified types of organi- zations, and in subsection (10) it mentions three specific types of organizations and provides that those three and other "like organi- zations" shall be exempt from taxation. This means that organi- zations like the three mentioned will be exempt and not organiza- tions which are like a distilled essence of the three relative noncomparable organizations. Specifically, if Congress had intended to include as exempt such a well known organization as an auto- mobile club within the coverage of section 101 (10), it would surely have done so specifically. New Jersey Automobile Club, 344. Internal Revenue 183
Expenses-trade or business.
Attorney or adjuster fees.
Where the taxpayer incurs attorney and adjuster fees in collecting claims arising from an involuntary conversion by fire of a capital asset, such fees are deductible from the capital gain and are not deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses. See, to the contrary, United States v. Pate, 254 F. 2d 480, and Ticket Office Equipment Co. v. Commissioner, 20 T.C. 272, affirmed on other grounds, 213 F. 2d 318. Where the gain is not taxable, the deduc- tion would be of no tax consequence. Towanda Textiles, 123. Internal Revenue 457, 543
The value of treasury stock which a corporation gives to its em- ployees as a bonus is deductible as an ordinary and necessary business expense representing salary or other compensation. Her- cules Powder Co., 77.
Expenses-trade or business-Continued
Expenditures in connection with illegal activities.
Ordinarily expenditures made by a business in connection with illegal activities will not be allowed as a business expense deduction where such allowance would frustrate sharply defined national or state policy; but where the expenditure does not constitute an ille- gal act in itself or a penalty for the commission of an illegal act, the expenditure, if otherwise allowable, will be allowed as a deduc- tion from gross income. Thus, where the taxpayer was engaged in the message business and instituted a flower purchase and deliv- ery service without proper authority and in violation of military currency regulations, the payment by the taxpayer of dollars to New York florists were not direct violations of any law or regula- tion and if the expenditure was a business expense or a loss, it is deductible from gross income. Commissioner v. Sullivan, 356 U.S.
27. RCA Communications, 784. Internal Revenue 568.1
Ordinary and necessary.
Where the taxpayer, engaged in the business of sending radio mes- sages, institutes a flower order business not for the purpose of earning a profit on the flower business but rather to stimulate its primary business of radio messages, the amounts paid to the florists were ordinary and necessary business expenses incurred in con- nection with the taxpayer's message business within the meaning of section 23 (a)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939. RCA Communications, 784.
Where the income received from a sale or exchange is ordinary income to the taxpayer, expenses incurred in realizing such gain are deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses. Where the expenses were incurred in the realization of a capital gain, they are deductible to reduce that gain. Towanda Textiles, 123. Internal Revenue 457, 558
Where the taxpayer's obligation to make an expenditure in con- nection with its message business became due and was actually carried out in 1945, that is the year in which the business expense deduction should be taken. The taxpayer's subsequent attempts to gain conversion of marks which it had received in Germany for the flowers it purchased for its customers in New York, will not bar the deduction in 1945 since the taxpayer was not on the accrual basis of accounting and the deduction relates to amounts actually paid out in 1945. RCA Communications, 784. Internal Revenue 574
INCOME TAX-Continued
DEDUCTIONS-Continued
Interest on indebtedness.
What constitutes.
Whether payments made with respect to a certain type of security constitute interest paid on an indebtedness which can be deducted by the taxpayer in computing its income taxes, or constitute divi- dends, depends on the true nature of the security as an indebtedness rather than a contribution to capital. The true nature of the secu- rity may be determined from all of the terms and provisions of the security, the purpose for which it was issued, the circumstances and the intention of the parties. Thus, where debentures of a corpora- tion were issued to the partners of the partnership acquired by the corporation in the same proportion as the partners' interests had been in the partnership, where no money was loaned to the corpora- tion by the recipients of the debentures, nothing was paid for the debentures, no preferred stock was issued by the corporation, the debentures were made subject and secondary to all other indebted- ness of the corporation, the holders had voting rights to change the provisions of the debentures, and where, although the company prospered, no dividends were paid on the common stock, the deben- tures were contributions to capital rather than an indebtedness and interest paid to the partners was a dividend and not deductible interest. R. C. Owen Co., 96. Internal Revenue
Where the taxpayer advances money to a borrower on the security of mortgages on the borrower's property and later the parties agree that the borrower cannot pay the sums owed and the mortgaged property is transferred to the taxpayer in full satisfaction of the borrower's indebtedness although a sale of the property later brings less than the debt, the loss to the taxpayer is a nonbusiness bad debt subject to the $1,000 limitation on deductions for capital losses and was deductible for the year in which the debt became worth- less, i.e., when the parties agreed that the debtor was unable to repay the debt. Bowles Lunch, Inc. v. United States, 91 C. Cls. 292, overruled. 26 U.S.C. § 23 (k) (4) (1952). Henry, 113.
Where the plaintiff had made a claim for war loss deduction with with respect to property located in Rumania and Hungary in 1941 and the examining officer for Internal Revenue Service allowed the amount of loss but for the year 1942, plaintiff in bringing suit for the refund of taxes paid in 1941 based on his contention that the
TAXES Continued
INCOME TAX-Continued
DEDUCTIONS—Continued
Losses-Continued
War losses-Continued
loss deduction should have been allowed for that year instead of 1942 was not required to produce other evidence as to the amount of loss. Pasternak, 306.
A taxpayer owning property in Rumania and Hungary in December 1941, when those countries were under the control of Germany, was entitled to a war loss deduction for the year 1941 which was the year the United States declared war on Germany. 26 U.S.C. (I.R.C. 1939) § 127(a)(2). Pasternak, 306.
Gains from sales and exchanges.
Corporation dealing in its own tsock.
Where a corporation distributes its treasury stock as bonuses to employees and the market value of the stock at the time of dis- tribution exceeds the basis of such stock, there is no resulting tax- able gain to the corporation since the corporation is not dealing in its own shares as it would in the shares of another corporation. Treasury Regulations 111, sec. 29.22(a)-15. Hercules Powder Co., 77.
INSURANCE COMPANIES.
Gross income.
Prepayment or penalty charges.
Prepayment charges received by a life insurance company on prom- issory notes and mortgages constitute interest within the meaning of section 201(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 and section 803 (a) (2) of the 1954 Code and are includible in the insur- ance company's gross income. Equitable Life Assurance Society,
NET INCOME-COMPUTATION OF.
Accounting periods and methods of accounting.
Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 and section 446 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 provide that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may compute a taxpayer's net income in a manner which will clearly reflect the taxpayer's income. Where a national motor club, an accrual basis taxpayer, treats its prepaid annual dues as income ratably over the 12-month period of member- ship whether or not such period extends beyond the close of the
TAXES-Continued
INCOME TAX-Continued
NET INCOME-COMPUTATION OF-Continued
Accounting periods and methods of accounting-Continued taxpayer's taxable year and where the expenses which were con- sidered to fall within the category of prepaid membership costs were not deducted entirely in the taxpayer's taxable year in which paid or incurred but instead were deducted ratably over the same periods of time that the dues were recognized as income, this method of accounting was purely artificial and the Commissioner's disallow- ance of taxpayer's deferral of income was proper. American Auto-
mobile Assn., 324.
Internal Revenue 1330
Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 provides that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may compute a taxpayer's net income in a manner which will clearly reflect the taxpayer's income. Where an automobile club on the accrual method of accounting made a pro rata allocation of the yearly membership dues in monthly amounts and reported for tax purposes only that portion of the yearly dues received as having been allegedly earned in the tax year, such method of accounting did not clearly reflect plaintiff's income and the Commissioner did not abuse his discretion under section 41 in refusing to permit such deferral of income and in computing the plaintiff's net income for tax purposes on the basis of the whole membership dues received in the tax year. New Jersey Automobile Club, 344.
Property transmitted at death.
In determining the gain from the sale of property acquired by inheritance, the basis for such determination shall be the fair market value of the property at the time of acquisition (death of the tes- tator). (26 U.S.C. § 113 (a) (5)) While the appraisal of the prop- erty for the purposes of Federal estate taxes may be prima facie evidence of actual or fair market value as of the date of the testator's death (Treasury Regulations 111, § 29.113 (a) (5)−1(c)), there may be circumstances in which a different value may be shown upon a subsequent sale of the property; and the application of the regulation, the doctrine of estoppel and related equitable doc- trines, must be applied with a careful regard to the circumstances of the particular case. Thus, where the beneficiaries of the estate were minors at the time of their testator's death, resided out of the country, had no knowledge of what was in their father's estate tax return in the United States, and where, despite an unrealistically low appraisal reported by the executors, there was furnished to the Internal Revenue Service a balance sheet of the company issuing
« PreviousContinue » |