« PreviousContinue »
He was then sent to St. Paul's School, under the care of Mr. Gill; and removed, in the beginning of his sixteenth year, to Christ's College in Cambridge, where he entered a sizar *, Feb. 12, 1624.
He was at this time eminently skilled in the Latin tongue ; and he himself, by annexing the dates to his first compositions, a boast of which Politian had given him an example, seems to commend the earliness of his own proficiency to the notice of pofterity. But the products of his vernal fertility have been surpafled by many, and particularly by his contemporary Cowley. Of the powers of the mind it is difficult to form an estimate: many have excelled Milton in their first efsays, who never rose to works like Paradise Loft.
At fifteen, a date which he uses till he is fixteen, he transated or versified two Psalms, 114 and 136, which he thought worthy of the publick eye; but they raise no great expectations ; they would in any numerous school have obtained praise, but not ex. cited wonder.
Many of his elegies appear to have been written in his eighteenth year, by which it appears that he had then read the Roman authors with very nice dilçernment. I once heard Mr. Hampton, the translator of Polybius, remark what I think is true, that
* In this affertion Dr. Johnson was mistaken. Milton was ad. mitted a pensioner, and not a fizar, as will appear by the following extract froin the College Register : " Johannes Milton “ Londinensis, filius Johannis, inftitutus fuit in literarum elementis “+ sub Mag’ro Gill Gymnafii Paulini præfecto, admissus est Pensio“ narius Minor Feb. 12°, 1624, sub M'ro Chappell, folvitq. pro “ Ingr. £o.sos. Od" R.
Milton was the first Englishman who, after the revival of Letters, wrote Latin verses with claffick elegance. If any exceptions can be made, they are very few : Haddon and Ascham, the pride of Eliza. beth's reign, however they have succeeded in profe, no sooner attempt verse than they provoke derifion, If we produced any thing worthy of notice before the elegies of Milton, it was perhaps Alabaster's Roxana *. · Of these exercises, which the rules of the Univerlity required, fome were published by him in his maturer years. They had been undoubtedly applauded; for they were such as few can form ; yet there is reafon to suspect that he was regarded in his college with no great fondness. That he obtained no fellowship is certain ; but the unkindness with which he was treated was not merely negative. I am ashamed to relate what I fear is true, that Milton was one of the last students in either university that suffered the pub. lick indignity of corporal correction.
It was, in the violence of controversial hoftility, objected to him, that he was expelled: this he steadily denies, and it was apparently not true ; but it seems plain from his own verses to Diodati, that he had incurred Ruftication, a temporary disiniffion into the country, with perhaps the loss of a term.
Me tenet urbs refluâ quam Thamesis alluit unda,
Meque nec invitum patria dulcis habet.
Nec dudum vetiti me laris angit amor.
* Published 1632. R.
Si fit hoc exilium patrias adiisse penates,
Et vacuuin curis otia grata fequi,
Lætus et exilii conditione fruor.,
I cannot find any meaning but this, which even kindness and reverence can give to the term, vetiti laris, “ a habitation from which he is excluded;" or how exile can be otherwise interpreted. He declares yet more, that he is weary of enduring the threats of a rigorous master, and something else, which a temper like his cannot undergo. What was more than threat was probably punishment. This poem, which mentions his exile, proves likewise that it was not perpetual; for it concludes with a resolution of returning some time to Cambridge. And it may be conjectured, from the willingness with which he has perpetuated the memory of his exile, that its cause was such as gave him no shame...
He took both the usual degrees; that of Batchelor in 1623, and that of Master in 1632; but he left the university with no kindness for its institution, alienated either by the injudicious severity of his governors, or his own captious perverseness. The cause cannot now be known, but the effect appears in his writings. His scheme of education, inscribed to Hartlib, supersedes all academical instruction, being intended to .coinprise the whole time which men usually spend in literature, from their entrance upon grammar, till they proceed, as it is called, Masters of Arts. And in his Discourse on the likeliest Way to remove Hirelings out of the Church, he inge.
nuously proposes, that the profits of the lands forfeited by the act for superstitious uses, hould be applied to such academies all over the land where languages and arts may be taught togetber; so that youth may be at once brought up to a competency of learning and an honest trade, by which means such of them as had the gift, being enabled to support themselves (without tithes) by the latter, may, by the help of the former, become worthy preachers.
One of his objections to academical education, as it was then conducted, is, that men designed for orders in the Church were permitted to act plays, writhing and unboning their clergy limbs to all the antick and dishoneft gestures of Trincalos *, buffoons, and bawds, prostituting the shame of that ministry which they had, or were near having, to the eyes of courtiers and courtladies, their grooms and mademoiselles.
This is sufficiently peevish in a man, who, when he mentions his exile from the college, relates, with great luxuriance, the compensation which the pleasures of the theatre afford him. Plays were therefore, only criminal when they were acted by academicks.
He went to the university with a design of entering into the church, but in time altered his mind; for he declared, that whoever became a clergyman must « subscribe slave, and take an oath withal,
* By the mention of this name, he evidently refers to Albu. mazar, acted at Cambridge in 1614. Ignoramus and other plays were performed at the fame time. The practice was then very frequent. The last dramatick performance at either university was The Grateful Fair, written by Christopher Smart, and repre. fented at Pembroke College, Cambridge, about 1747. R.
; 66 which, “ which, unless he took with a conscience that could " not retch, he must straight perjure himself. He « thought it better to prefer a blameless silence " before the office of speaking, bought and begun $' with servitude and forswearing."
These expressions are, I find, applied to the subscription of the Articles; but it seems more probable that they relate to canonical obedience. I know not any of the Articles which seem to thwart his opinions: but the thoughts of obedience, whether canonical or civil, raised his indignation.
His unwillingness to engage in the ministry, perhaps not yet advanced to a settled resolution of declining it, appears in a letter to one of his friends, who had reproved his suspended and dilatory life, which he seems to have imputed to an insatiable curiosity, and fantastick luxury of various knowledge. To this he writes a cool and plausible answer, in which he endeavours to persuade him, that the delay proceeds not from the delights of desultory study, but from the desire of obtaining more fitness for his task; and that he goes on, not taking thought of being late, so it gives advantage to be more fit.
When he left the university, he returned to his father, then residing at Horton in Buckinghamshire, with whom he lived five years, in which time he is said to have read all the Greek and Latin writers. With what limitations this universality is to be understood, who fhall inform us?
It might be supposed, that he who read so much fhould have done nothing else; but Milton found time to write the Masque of Comus, which was pre. sented at Ludlow, then the residence of the Lord