(1974). 14. See Note, "The International Joint Commission and International Boundary and Water Commission: Potential for Environmental Control Along the Boundaries, 6 N.Y.U.J. INT'L L. and POL. 499 (1973). 15. Sierra Club v. AEC, 4 ELR 20885 (Docket 1867-73, D.D.C. Aug. 3, 1974). 16. Environmental Defense Fund v. AID, 6 ELR 20121 (Docket 75-0500, D.D.C. Dec. 5, 1975). 17. Sierra Club v. Coleman, 405 F. Supp. 53; 421 F. Supp. 63; 6 ELR 20799; (Docket No. 75-1040 (D.D.C. Oct. 17, 1975; Sept 23, 1976); mdfd. sub. nom. Sierra Club v. Adams, 578 F. 2d 389, Docket No. 762158 (D.C. Cir., March 14, 1978). 18. Sierra Club v. Adams, 578 F. 2d 389 at 391-92, note 14. 19. A.D. Tarlock, "The Application of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 To The Darien Gap Highway Project, 7 N.Y.U.J. INT L. L. and POL. 459 (1974). 20. 42 USC 4332(2)(F), originally enacted as $102(2)(E() in P.L. 91190. 21. 463 F. 2d 1261 (D.C. Cir., 1972). 22. Id. at 1262-63. 23. People of Saipan v. Interior, 356 F. Supp. 645 (D. Haw. 1973), aff'd as mfd 502 F. 2d 90 (9th Cir., 1974); People of Enewatak v. Laird, 353 F. Supp. 811 (D. Haw. 1973); see also NORMAL v. State, 452 F. Supp. 1226, 8 ELR 20572 11 ERC 1841 (Docket 78-0428; D.D.C. June 8, 1978), noted in "NEPA and the Mexican Marijuana Eradication Program, 19 NAT. RES. J. 213 (1979). 24. CEQ memorandum to Heads of Agencies, from Russell Peterson, September 24, 1976. 25. CEQ Memorandum to Heads of Agencies, from Charles Warren, January 19, 1978. 26. Id. at Appendix B, letter of Dec. 9, 1977 from AID Administrator John J. Gilligan. 27. E.0. 12114 (Jan. 4, 1979); see also "President Orders Environmental Review of International Actions, 9 E.L.R. 10011 (Jan., 1979. 28. Section 2-5(a), E.0. 12114. 29. NRDC v. NRC, 647 F. 2d. 1345 (D.C. Cir., 1981). 30. The CEO Legal Advisory Committee had reported this trend as early Senator Jackson in floor debate on NEPA, 115 CONG. REC. 4041 31. 32. Japan, Cabinet Decision, "On Implementation of Environmental Impact Assessment," 28 August 1984. 33. Agenda Item 10, UNEP Governing Council, 14th Session, June 1987. 35. ASEAN Agreement on the Conservation of Nature and Natural 2) In those cases where any such activities are undertaken, the Contracting Parties shall plan and carry them out so as to overcome or minimize any assessed adverse effects and shall monitor such effects with a view to taking remedial action as appropriate." 36. See generally the texts of various laws and the revised Treaty on the Conservation of Nature, Organization of African Unity, reprinted in ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND LAW (editorial offices in Bonn F.R.G.). 37. Article 7 of EEC Directive, supra note 2. 38. On Hungary, see Sandor Kisgyorgy, "The Possibilities and 39. This has been the case since shortly after NEPA's enactment. See, e.g. the EIS for a loan by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development of $3.5 million for an apartment building in Oregon, Goose Hollow Foothills Leaque v. Romney, 334 F. Supp. F. Supp. 877, 1 ELR 20492 (D.C. Or., 1971). 40. Section 118, 22 U.S.C. 2151 p. 41. Section 117 (c) of the Foreign Assistance Act, 95 Stat. 1533. 42. Charles Warren, "A Look Before We Leap: Applying NEPA To U.S. Actions Abroad, 3rd Annual Conference, Nat'l Assoc. of Envir'l Professionals (Feb. 8, 1978). 43. H.J.R. 395 (Dec. 21, 1987); FY 1988 Continuing Resolution is Public Law 100-202. 44. Id., $537(a). 45. 22 C.F.R. Part 216. 46. On programmatic environmental impact statements generally see W.H. RODGERS, JR., ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, $7.9 (Wests, 1977). 47. 115 CONG. REC. 29002 (Oct. 8, 1969). |