11. REQUIREMENT: (Continued) IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Existing substandard, high fire/life safety risk barracks will remain in use, perpetuating high maintenance costs, high energy consumption, and low troop morale. MAY C. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE 589 ($000) 12 (PEOPLE) 13,823 N/A ($000 21 Dec 81 ...... 35 Percent Complete as of 29 January 1982...... d. Data Design Completed.. BASIS 8. Standard or Definitive Design Yes b. Where Design Was Most Recently Used X No Fort Benning, Georgia Production of Plans and Specs (6% limit). All other design costs.... Total Cost = (a+b) = (d+e). 600 EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT WHICH WILL BE PROVIDED FROM 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Upgrade an existing main substation and convert switching stations A and R to substations. Provide new 15 KV breakers, regulators and busses of adequate interrupting capacity. 11. REQUIREMENT: PROJECT: pgrade of electrical distribution system. REQUIREMENT: This project is required to insure continued operational capability for existing buildings: to accommodate planned new construction, and to interface with a new 230 KV feeder to Fort Bragg. CURRENT SITUATION: Fort Bragg is supplied with electrical ower by a single point delivery transmission line to the main station. The main station was constructed in 1934 and has been modified and expanded in the past. This station requires upgrading to allow for future transmission voltage increases. The major electrical demand has shifted from the vicinity of the main substation to an area five miles away. Power is now supplied to this area by using feeders from the existing substation. Το provide a more reliable electrical supply, the Carolina Power and Light is constructing a new feeder to the existing substation and the two switching stations. This project will upgrade the switching stations to substations and upgrade the existing substation to accommodate this new supply. IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: The existing substation and switching stations will not be able to accommodate the new electrical feeder consequently adequate electrical power will not be available at Fort Bragg. C. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE D. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE F. 4. (month and year) EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT WHICH WILL BE PROVIDED FROM DD 1391c PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY UNTIL EXHAUSTED PAGE NO 16A 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Construction of administration and supply buildings for six companies. Utility services are included in PN B302-373. Eleven temporary-type World War II mobilization buildings, totaling 39,460 SF will be demolished to clear the construction site. Not sited in a flood plain. Heating from a central heat plant. Air Conditioning 48 Tons. 11. REQUIREMENT: 1,270,185 SF Adequate: 665,284 SF Substandard: 176,896 SF PROJECT: Construct six company administration and supply buildings. REQUIREMENT: This project is needed to provide adequate permanent administration and supply facilities for 1st Corps Support Command units now housed in temporary facilities, and for unit activations scheduled for Fort Bragg during the period September 1982 through April 1983 that include chemical and petroleum supply companies. CURRENT SITUATION: There are no adequate existing facilities at Fort Bragg that can be converted for use. All permanent facilities are now in use and expected to continue. Existing temporary type structures are wooden frame, open area buildings, originally designed as temporary barracks. Their high maintenance and operational cost and their small size per building make these buildings an impractical choice for this requirement. Extensive upgrade would be required to these buildings, vet they would still be substandard temporary type structures. IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Inadequate temporary type World War II mobilization buildings will continue in use. MAY |