Page images
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

High-bay pre-engineered metal building addition to house three test cells; building alterations and modernization; fire protection system, air conditioning, utility connections.

11.

REQUIREMENT: 30,000 SF. ADEQUATE: 0 SF. SUBSTANDARD: 10,000 SF. PROJECT: Provides an addition and alterations to existing facilties for a shipboard environmental simulation facility to evaluate weapon security systems for shipboard use.

REQUIREMENT: Adequate facilities for testing and evaluating Navy's vulnerability of shipboard nuclear weapons to theft, sabotage, or any other form of compromise in an attempt to coerce or embarrass the United States by neutralizing and/or overcoming physical security. This facility will provide realistically configured shipboard model to simulate a composite of those spaces crucial to nuclear weapon security.

CURRENT SITUATION: The present security system was designed to meet the security needs of the mid-1950's. However, this system is not adequate to counter the increasingly sophisticated threats to shipboard nuclear weapons in today's politically unstable world. Terrorist activity and disloyal crew incidents have greatly increased. These groups often have the expertise required to defeat present security system. Therefore, a more effective security system using state-of-the-art technology is required. (Continued on DD 1391c)

[blocks in formation]

2. DATE

FY 19_83_MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

1. COMPONENT

NAVY

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

NAVAL SURFACE WEAPONS CENTER, WHITE OAK, MARYLAND 4. PROJECT TITLE

5. PROJECT NUMBER

SHIPBOARD ENVIRONMENTAL SIMULATION FACILITY

P-071

11.

(Continued)

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Continue present unsatisfactory operations utilizing mid-1950's standards and techniques for nuclear physical security. An issue as important and sensitive as nuclear weapons security should not be compromised. New security systems will be installed aboard ship without adequate testing. The risk of installing ineffective systems or systems with high false alarm rates will be greatly increased. Security of nuclear weapons will suffer. ADDITIONAL: An economic analysis was made comparing life-cycle costs of testing as provided by this project to testing aboard a dedicated ship. The result show life-cycle cost for this project to be less costly than shipboard testing. This project provides many unquantifiable technical and economic benefits over shipboard testing.

DD.

FORM

1 DEC 76

1391c

PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED

PAGE NO. 211

1. COMPONENT

NAVY

2. DATE

FY 1983 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

NAVAL SURFACE WEAPONS CENTER, WHITE OAK, MARYLAND 4. PROJECT TITLE

SHIPBOARD ENVIRONMENTAL SIMULATION FACILITY

5. PROJECT NUMBER

P-071

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

A. ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST TO OPERATE THE PROPOSED FACILITY..

150

($000)

B.

NUMBER OF ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT
THE FUNCTION OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY.

3

(PEOPLE)

C.

ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE
PROPOSED FACILITY.

4,600
($000)

D. ESTIMATED LIFE-CYCLE COST TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE
EXISTING FACILITY IF NEW FACILITY IS A REPLACEMENT.

DESIGN DATA (Estimated)

N/A

($000)

E.

[blocks in formation]

EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT WHICH WILL BE PROVIDED
FROM OTHER APPROPRIATIONS:

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

a.

Included in following program (FY 84): None. b. Major planned next three years:

315.20

Mine Engineering Laboratory

[blocks in formation]

10.

Mission or Major Functions: Provide in-service engineering support, inventory and fiscal management, acquisition, test and integrated logistics support for underwater mines and certain surface-deployed mine countermeasures equipment.

[blocks in formation]

DD FORM 1390 SUPPLEMENTAL DATA
FY 1983 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

NAVY COMPONENT

NAVAL MINE ENGINEERING FACILITY,
YORKTOWN, VIRGINIA
INSTALLATION/LOCATION

CHIEF OF NAVAL

A. Estimated Cost of Backlog of Real Property Maintenance (BMAR) (as of September 30, 1981):

MATERIAL
COMMAND

($000)

410

[blocks in formation]
« PreviousContinue »