Page images
PDF
EPUB

(d) On 24 occasions during 1976 the Chairman or other members of the Committee appeared as speakers at seminars, conferences, briefings and similar efforts designed to improve understanding and administration of the Act. These presentations, which usually included questions from the floor, were arranged by the Civil Sevice Commission, other agencies, or by professional groups containing significant numbers of agency personnel and users of the Act. It is estimated that a total of over 1,700 persons, chiefly agency executives, supervisors and lawyers, attended these 24 presentations, of which 13 were conducted in Washington and 11 in other cities. In addition, speakers for similar presentations were furnished by the Information and Privacy Section of the Civil Division, the Office of Privacy and Information Appeals in the Deputy Attorney General's Office, the Administrative Counsel of the Office of Management and Finance, and the Special Litigation Unit of the Tax Division, all of which have generally supported efforts to encourage improved agency compliance with the Act.

(e) Complaints in recently filed Freedom of Information suits were reviewed by the Committee, and in appropriate instances comments thereon were made to the Civil Division.

(f) Complaints by letter or telephone about how agencies administered the Act were received from citizens, lawyers, and business firm, in some cases through the office of a legislator. In about a dozen instances, where it appeared the agency might be acting illegally or negligently, or that the proper handling of a request could otherwise be assisted, appropriate guidance was given to the agency or to the requester.

[Exhibit 137]

COURT DECISIONS UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 1

(1) Abrahamson Chrysler-Plymouth v. NLRB, 91 L.R.R.M. 2343 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 29, 1976), temporary restraint of agency proceeding pending disposition of FOI claim.

(2) Abrahamson Chrysler-Plymouth v. NLRB, Civ. No. 76-C-248 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 2, 1976), X7(A).

(3) Ackerly v. Ley, 420 F. 2d 1336 (D.C. Cir. 1969), X5, 6.

(4) Amerace Corp. v. NLRB, 91 L.R.R.M. 2344 (W.D. Tenn. Dec. 15, 1975), preliminary injunction of agency proceeding pending disposition of FOI claim. (5) Amerace v. NLRB, 92 L.R.R.M. 3497 (W. D. Tenn. June 10, 1976), X5, 7(A), (C), (D).

(6) AFGE v. Rosen, 418 F. Supp. 205 (N.D. Ill. 1976), attorney's fees (a) (4) (E).

(7) American Jewish Congress v. Morton, Civ. Act No. 75-1541 (D.D.C. April 30, 1976), X3.

(8) American Mail Line, Ltd. v. Gulick, 411 F.2d 696 (D.C. Cir. 1969), X5. (9) AMF v. NLRB, 91 L.R.R.M. 2420 (D. Colo. Feb. 12, 1976), temporary restraint of agency proceeding pending disposition of FOI claim.

(10) Amway v. FTC, 1976-1 Trade Cas. para. 60.798 (D.D.C. Mar. 10, 1976), X4, 5, 7(A), (D), in camera inspection.

(11) Anchorage Building Trades Council v. HUD, 384 F. Supp. 1236 (D. Alas. 1974), X7.

(12) Anderson v. Butz, 550 F. 2d 459 (9th Cir. 1977), (a) (1) (D), (a) (2) (B) publication.

(13) Ash Grove Cement Co. v. FTC, 371 F. Supp. 370 (D.D.C. 1973), remanded 511 F. 2d 815 (D.C. Cir. 1975), rehearing denied 519 F. 2d 934 (D.C. Cir. 1975), X5, 7.

(14) Aspin v. Department of Defense, 348 F. Supp. 1081 (D.D.C. 1972), aff'd 491 F.2d 24 (D.C. Cir. 1973), X5, 7.

(15) Associated Dry Goods Corp v. EEOC, 419 F. Supp. 814 (E.D. Va. 1976), parties (a) (4) (B), X1–9, discretionary release.

(16) Association of American Railroads v. United States, 371 F. Supp. 114 (D.D.C. 1974), X3.

(17) Astro Communications Laboratory v. Renegotiation Board, Civ. No. 240370 (D.D.C. May 16, 1974), (a) (2), X5.

1 List is taken from Justice Department Freedom of Information Committee, July 1977 FOIA Case List.

(18) Atlas Industries v. NLRB, 91 L.R.R.M. 2676 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 23, 1976), injunction of agency proceeding pending resolution of FOI claim, X5, X7(A). (19) Aug v. Natl. Railroad Fassenger Corp., 425 F. Supp. 946 (D.D.C. 1976), X2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, “agency."

(20) Automobile Club of Missouri v. NLRB, 71 CCH Lab. Cas. para. 13,672 (D.D.C. May 15, 1973), prohibiting termination of agency proceeding pending resolution of FOI request.

(21) Aviation Consumer Action Project v. Washburn, 535 F. 2d 101 (D.C. Cir. 480 F. 2d 1195 (D.C. Cir. 1972), exhaustion of administrative remedies. (22) Aviation Consumer Action Project v. CAB, 412 F. Supp. 1028 (D.D.C. 1976) X3, 5, (a) (2).

(23) Aviation Consumer Action Project v. CAB, 418 F. Supp. 634 (D.D.C. 1976), X1, (by implication), X5, (a) (6) (C), “prompt disclosure."

(24) Aviation Consumer Action Project v. Washburn, 535 F. 2d 101 (D.C. Cir. 1976), X5, FACA.

(25) B & C Tire Co., Inc. v. IRS, 376 F. Supp. 708 (N.D. Ala. 1974), (a) (3), X3, 5, 7.

(26) Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Rumsfeld, 70 F.R.D. 595 (N.D. Ohio 1976), reverse FOI case, jurisdiction, X3 (18 U.S.C. § 1905).

(27) Bachrack v. CIA, No. CV 75-3727-WPG (C.D. Cal. May 13, 1976), X3. (28) Baker v. CIA, 425 F. Supp. 633 (D.D.C. 1977), X3.

(29) Baldwin v. Finney, Civ. No. 75–1221 (D.D.C. Dec. 20, 1976), X7(A). (30) Bannercraft Clothing Co. v. Renegotiation Board, 466 F. 2d 345 (D.C. Cir. 1972), rev'd and remanded 415 U.S. 1 (1974), injunction of agency proceeding pending resolution of FOI suit, (a) (3).

(31) Baptist Memorial Hospital v. NLRB, 92 L.R.R.M. 2645 (W.D. Tenn. April 2, 1976), X5, 7(a), (C), (D).

(32) Barceloneta Shoe Corp. v. Compton, 271 F. Supp. 591 (D.P.R. 1967), X4, 7.

(33) Barnes & Noble Bookstores v. NLRB, 92 L.R.R.M. 2169 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 12, 1976), X7.

(34) Bayview Associates v. NLRB, 75 CCH Lab. Cas. para. 10,524 (D.D.C. Dec. 20, 1974), injunction of agency proceeding pending examination by plantiff of (a) (2) indices.

(35) Bell v. United States Department of Defense, 71 F.R.D. 349 (D.N.H. 1976), X1, in camera inspection.

(36) Bellingham Frozen Foods v. Henderson, 91 L.R.R.M. 2761 (W.D. Wash. Mar. 5, 1976), X5, 7(A), (C), (D).

(37) Bennett v. United States Department of Defense, 419 F. Supp. 663 (S.D.N.Y. 1976), X1, 3, 5.

(38) Benson v. General Services Administration, 289 F. Supp. 590 (W.D. Wash. 1968), aff'd 415 F. 2d 878 (9th Cir. 1969), X2, 4, 5.

(39) Benson v. United States, 309 F. Supp. 1144 (D. Neb. 1970), X7.

(40) Black v. Sheraton Corp. of America, 371 F. Supp. 97 (D.D.C. 1974), X7. (41) Blaisdell v. Department of Defense, Civ. No. CV 77-83-DWW (C.D. Cal. May 5, 1977), X1.

(42) Blue v. Bureau of Prisons, Civ. No. C-75-2092A (N.D. Ga. August 12, 1976), "agency records," "agency," attorney's fees, X5, fees.

(43) Bodner v. FTC, 74-2 CCH Trade Cas. para. 74,289 (D.D.C. Oct. 31, 1974), discovery.

(44) Bodner v. FTC, 1975 CCH Trade Cas. para. 60,118 (D.D.C. Jan. 9, 1975), Vaughn v. Rosen index requirement.

(45) Bodner v. FTC, Civ. No. 74-1189 (D.D.C. Feb. 24, 1975), X5.

(46) Boston University v. NLRB, 95 L.R.R.M. 2447 (D. Mass. April 28, 1977), X7.

(47) Boult v. Department of Justice, Civ. No. C76-1217A (N.D. Ga. Oct. 22, 1976), (a) (6) (C), Vaughn v. Rosen, index requirement.

(48) Brandon v. Sampson, Civ. No. 73–2232 (D.D.C. April 24, 1974), X3. (49) Brawer v. FBI, Civ. No. 75-1700 (D.D.C. Feb. 28, 1977), exhaustion of administrative remedies, time limits.

(50) Bristol-Myers Co. v. FTC, 284 F. Supp. 745 (D.D.C. 1968), rev'd 424 F. 2d 935 (D.C. Cir. 1970), cert. denied 400 U.S. 824 (1970), X4, 5, 7.

(51) Brockway v. Department of the Air Force, 370 F. Supp. 738 (N.D. Iowa 1974), rev'd 518 F. 2d 1184 (8th Cir. 1975), X4, 5.

(52) Bryant v. IRS Civ. No. 76-31-SD (D. Me. July 21, 1976), X7(A).

(53) Burroughs Corp. v. Schlesinger, 403 F. Supp. 663 (E.D. Va. 1975), X4, reverse FOI case, 18 U.S.C. § 1905.

(54) Campbell v. United States Civil Service Commission, Civ. Act No. 75-M494 (D. Colo. Sept. 4, 1975), aff'd 539 F. 2d 58 (10th Cir. 1976), X2, 5, 6.

(55) Capital Cities Communications, Inc. v. NLRB, 409 F. Supp. 971 (N.D. Cal. 1976), injunction of agency proceeding pending resolution of FOI claim, X7(A). (56) Celmins v. United States Department of Treasury Civ. Nos. 76–2161, 76– 2162 (D.D.C. April 25, 1977), X6.

(57) Center for National Policy Review on Race & Urban Issues v. Richardson, Civ. No. 2177–71 (D.D.C. Dec. 8, 1972), rev'd sub nom. Center for National Policy Review on Race & Urban Issues v. Weinberger, 523 F. 2d 370 (D.C. Cir. 1974), (a) (3), X7.

(58) Center for National Policy Review on Race & Urban Issues v. Richardson, 534 F.2d 351 (D.C. Cir. 1976), X7.

(59) Cervase v. Department of State, Civ. No. 76-2338 (D. N.J. April 1, 1977), X1, tardy classification in camera inspection.

(60) Cessna Aircraft Co. v. NLRB, 405 F. Supp. 1042 (D. Kan. 1975), rev'd 542 F.2d 834 (10th Cir. 1976), (a) (3), (4) (B), X5, 7(A), (C), (D).

(61) Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Legal Aid Society, 423 U.S. 1309 (Douglas, Circuit Justice 1975), X3, discovery.

(62 Chamberlain v. Alexander, 419 F. Supp. 235 (S.D. Ala. 1976), X3, 5, 6, 7(A), (C), (D), (a) (2) (C).

(63) Chappell v. Hodgson Civ. No. No. 15,480 (D. Conn. July 23, 1973, X6.

(6) Chassen Bakers Inc. v. NLRB, 91 L.R.R.M. 2345 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 12, 1975), temporary restraint of agency proceeding pending disposition of FOI claim, X7 (A)

(65) Charles River Park "A", Inc. v. HUD, 360 F. Supp. 212 (D.D.C. 1973), remanded 519 F.2d 935 (D.C. Cir 1975), X4, reverse FOI case, 18 U.S.C. § 1905. (66) Chavkin v. Alexander, 401 F. Supp., 817 (SD.N.Y. 1975), X7.

(67) Chrysler Corp. v. NLRB, 92 L.R.R.M. 3191 (S.D. Mich. July 7, 1976) X5, 7(A), (C), (D).

(68) Chrysler Corp. v. Schlesinger, 412F. Supp. 171 (D. Del. 1976), X4, 18 U.S.C. § 1905, 5th Amendment notice requirement, reverse FOI case.

(69) Church of Scientology of California v. Bell, Civ. No. 76-1006 (D.D.C. June 8, 1977), X5.

(70) Church of Scieniology of California v. Bush, Civ. No. 75-1048 (D.D.C. June 8, 1977, X1, 3, 7 (E), in camera inspection.

(71) Church of Scientology of California v. Department of Defense, Civ. No. 75-4072F (C.D. Cal. June 2, 1977), X1, 6, 7 (C), (D) in camera inspection.

(72) Church of Scientology of California v. United States Department of Justice, 410 F. Supp. 1297 (C.D. Cal. 1976), X1, 2, 5, 7(A), (D), (F).

(73) Church of Scientology of California, Inc. v. ERDA, Civ. No. 76–0011 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 23, 1976), “agency records", which agency's.

(74) Cica-Geigy Corp. v. Mathews, 428 F. Supp. 523 (S.D.N.Y.) 1977, “agency", "agency records.".

(75) Citizens for a Better Environment v. United States Department of Commerce, 410 F. Supp. 1248 (N.D. Ill. 1976), X3, 4.

(76) City of Concord v. Ambrose, 333 F. Supp. (N.D. Cal. 1971), (a) (1), (2). (3), X2, 5.

(77) Cleaver v. Kelley, 415 F. Supp. 174 (D.D.C. 1976), vacated and remanded per curiam Civ. No. 76–1831 (D.C. Cir. Nov. 23, 1976), on remand 427 F. Supp. 89 (D.D.C. 1976), (a) (6) (C).

(78) Clement Brothers Co. v. NLRB, 282 F. Supp. 540 (N.D. Ga 1968), aff'd 407 F.2d 1027 5th Cir. 1969), X7.

(79) Climax Molybdenum Co. v. NLRB, 407 F. Supp. 208 (D. Colo. 1975), aff'd 539 F.2d 63 (10th Cir. 1976), X5, 7(A), (C), (D), discovery.

(80) Cogswell v. FDA, Civ. No. 51990-ACW (N.D. Cal. June 5, 1970, X3, 4, 5. 7.

(81) Collins v. Federal Highway Admin., Civ. Act. No. 6486 (E.D. Va. July 29, 1968), X7.

(82) Columbia Packing Company, Inc. v. United States Department of Agri culture, 417 F. Supp. 651 (D. Mass. 1976), X6.

(83) Comey v. AEC. Civ. Nos 73-1258, 73-1358 (7th Cir. July 27, 1973), X5. (84) Commercial Envelope Mfg. Co. v. SEC, 450 F.2d 342 2d Cir. 1971), FOI suits brought in D. Cts., not Cir. Ct.

(85) Committee to Investigate Assassinations, Inc. v. Department of Justice, Civ. No. 71-1829 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 24, 1973), X7.

(86) Committee on Masonic Homes v. NLRB, 414 F.Supp. 426 (E.D. Pa. 1976), vacated and demanded for clarification 95 L.R.R.M. 2457 (3d Cir. May 9, 1977) venue, (a) (4) (B). (D), X5, 6, 7(A), (C), (D).

(87) Communist Party of the U.S. v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civ. Act. No. 761770 (D.C.C. March 23, 1976), (a) (4) (E), mootness, backlog.

(88) Consumers Union v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Civ. No. 1766–73 (D.D.C. May 31, 1974), X4.

(89) Consumers Union of the United States v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 410 F. Supp. 63 (D.D.C. 1975), (a) (4) (E) attorney's fees. (90) Consumers Union of the United States, Inc. v. Consumer Produce Safety Comm'n., 400 F.Supp. 848 (D.D.C. 1975), rev'd and remanded Civ. No. 76–2059 (D.C. Cir. July 5, 1977), case or controversy, reverse FOI case.

(91) Consumers Union v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 1975 CCH F. Carr. Cas. para 82,528 (D.D.C. Aug. 13, 1974), declaratory relief.

(92) Consumers Union v. Sarbe, 1974 CCH Trade Cas. para. 75,057 (D.D.C. May 9, 1974), declaratory relief, X4, 7.

(93) Consumers Union v. Veterans' Administration, 301 F.Supp. 796 (S.D.N.Y. 1969), dis'd as moot 436 F.2d 1363 (2d Cir. 1971), X2, 4, 5.

(94) Continental Oil Co. v. FPC, 519 F.2d 31 (5th Cir. 1976), X4, reverse FOI

case.

(95) Control Data Corp. v. FTC, No. 4-74-Civ.-25 (D. Minn. May 3, 1974), X2, 5, 7.

(96) Control Data Corp. v. FTC, No. 4-74-Civ. 412 (D. Minn. Sept. 3, 1975) motion for reconsideration deried (Oct. 16, 1975), X5, 7(A), (D), in camera inspection, fees.

(97) Cook v. Willingham, 400 F.2d 885 (10th Cir. 1968), Ct. records are not agency records.

(98) Cooney v. Sun Shipbuilding & Drydock Co., 288 F.Supp. 708 (E.D. Pa. 1968), X7.

(99) Cooper v. Department of the Navy, 396 F.Supp. 1040 (M.D. La. 1975), X5. (100) Cowles Communications, Inc. v. Department of Justice, 325 F.Supp. 726 (N.D. Cal. 1971), X7.

(101) Cor v. Levi, 427 F.Supp. 833 (W.D. Mo. 1977), X2.

(102) Cor v. United States Department of Justice, Civ. No. 76 CV 470-W-2 (W.D. Mo. April 29, 1977), (a) (2) (C), X2, 7, “reasonably segregable."

(103) Cox v. United States Department of Justice, Civ. No. 77-0299-CV-W-3 (W.D. Mo. June 15, 1977), "records."

(104) Cox v..Uniited States Department of Justice, Civ. No. 76 CV 777-W-4 (W.D. Mo. June 27, 1977), X2, 7 (C).

(105) Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. Kleppe, 424 F.Supp. 744 (D. Md. 1976), reverse FOI case, X3 (42 U.S.C. § 2000e-8 (e), 18 U.S.C. § 1905. 44 U.S.C. § 3508).

(106) Cuneo v. Laird, 336 F.Supp. 504 (D.D.C. 1972), rev'd and remanded in part sub nom. Cuneo v. Schlesinger, 484 F.2d 1086 (D.D.C. Cir. 1973), cert. denied 415 U.S. 977 (1974), X2, 5.

(107) Cuneo v. Rumsfeld, Civ. No. 75-2219, 40 Ad. L. 2d (P & F) 943 (D.C. Cir. March 24, 1977), (a) (4) (E) attorney's fees.

(108) Cupp v. Levi, Civ. Act No. 75-399 (W.D. Pa. August 5, 1975), exhaustion of administrative remedies.

(109) Cutler v. CAB, 375 F.Supp. 722 (D.D.C. 1974), X3, 4.

(110) David B. Lilly Co. v. The Renegotiation Board, 521 F.2d 315 (D.C. Cir. 1975), (a) (2), X5.

(111) Dean v. Butz, 428 F.Supp. 477, 477-481 (D. Hawaii 1977), (a) (1) (D) publication.

(112) Deering Milliken, Inc. v. Nash, Civ. Act. No. 75-864 (D.S.C. Nov. 12, 1975), rev'd in part and remanded sub nom. Deering Milliken, Inc. v. Irving, 546 F.2d 1131 (4th Cir. 1977), X5, 7(A), (C), (D).

(113) Diapuise Corp. v. FDA, 500 F.2d 75 (2d Cir. 1974), fees.

(114) DiModica v. FBI, Civ. No. C75-2480A (N.D. Ga. April 19, 1977), duty of agency to search, burden of proof on whether records are exempt.

(115) Disabled Officer's Association v. Rumsfeld, Civ. No. 76-0520 (D.D.C.

Feb. 24, 1977), X6, "agency records," "records."

(116) Distillery, Rectifying, Wine and Allied Workers v. Miller, 68 CCH Lab. Cas. para. 12,750 (W.D. Ky. May 17, 1972), X5, 7, discovery.

(117) Ditlow v. Shultz, 379 F.Supp. 326 (D.D.C. 1974), decision deferred 517 F.2d 166 (D.C. Cir. 1975), X4, 6.

(118) Ditlow v. Volpe, 362 F.Supp.. 1321 (D.D.C. 1973), rev'd sub nom. Ditlow v. Brinegar, 494 F.2d 1073 (D.C. Cir. 1974), X3, 4. 5, 7.

(119) Donn Products, Inc. v. NLRB, 93 L.R.R.M. 2065 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 12 1976), X7 (A). 5, 6.

(120) Dorl v. Levi, Civ. No. 75-2077 (D.N.P. March 8, 1977), X5, 6, “agency records," "reasonably segregable."

(121) Duncan v. United States Civil Service Commission, 426 F.Supp. 41 (E.D. La. 1976), X6, discovery.

(122) E. L. Rice and Co. v. Nash, 92 L.R.R.M. 3280 (E.D. Mich. July 7, 1976), X7(A), (C), (D).

(123) East Tenn. Research Corp. v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 416 F.Supp. 988 (D.D.C. 1976), (a) (4) (B, E).

(124) Echols v. NLRB, 525 F.2d 288 (6th Cir. 1975), jurisdiction.

(125) Electri-Flex Co. v. NLRB, 412 F.Supp. 698 (N.D. Ill. 1976), (a) (4) (B), injunction of agency proceeding pending resolution of FOI suit, X5, 7(A). (126) Emery v. Laise, 431 F.Supp. 91 (D.D.C. 1976), (a) (4) (F).

(127) Epstein v. Resor, 296 F.Supp. 214 (N.D. Cal. 1969), aff'd 421 F.2d 930 (9th Cir. 1970), cert. denied 398 U.S. 965 (1970), X1.

(128) Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Los Alamos Constructors. Inc., 382 F.Supp. 1373 (D.N.M. 1974), X5.

(129) Etheridge v. IRS, 74-1 U.S.T.C. para. 9354 (N.D. Ga. March 12, 1974), (a) (3), X7, exhaustion of administrative remedies.

(130) Ethyl Corp v. EPA, 478 F.2d 47 (4th Cir. 1973), X5, executive privilege. (131) Evans v. Department of Transportation, 446 F.2d 821 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied 405 U.S. 918 (1972), X3.

(132) Exner v. FBI, 542 F.2d 1121 (9th Cir. 1976), (a) (6) (C).

(133) Exxon Corp. v. FTC, 384 F.Supp. 755 (D.D.C. 1974), “identifiable records," X5, 7.

(134) Fackelman v. Department of Justice, Civ. No. C-75-2157A (N.D. Ga. 1976), (a) (4) (A), fees waiver of Vaughn v. Rosen index requirement.

(135) Farrel v. Ignatius, 283 F.Supp. 58 (S.D. N.Y. 1968), Ct. will not entertain FOI suit until complaint filed.

(136) Fenster v. Fletcher, Civ. No. 822-71 (D.D.C. Aug. 16, 1971), X4, 5. (137) Fensterwald v. CIA, Civ. Act No. 75-282A (ED. Va. Oct. 22, 1975), X6, attorney's fees.

(138) Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. v. Department of Transportation, Civ Nos. 75-232A, 76-965, 76-1053 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 21, 1976), X4 5, 7 (A), (E), discovery, Rule 34, (a) (2), (a) (2) (e).

(139) First Girl, Inc. v. Department of Labor, Civ. No. 75C-3133 N.D. III. July 7, 1976), X4, 7, equitable discretion.

(140) Fisher v. Renegotiation Board, 473, F.2d 109 (D.C. Cir. 1972), on remand 335 F.Supp. 1171 (D.D.C. 1973), X4, 5.

(141) Fitzgibbon v. CIA, Civ. No. 76–700 (D.D.C. Jan. 10, 1977), Fees.

(142) Florence v. United States Department of Defense, 415 F.Supp. 156 (D.D.C. 1976), X1, (a) (4) (E) attorney's fees.

(142.5) Fonda v. CIA, No. 76-0285 (D.D.C. July 8, 1977), X1, 2, 3 (50 U.S.C. § 403), X5, 6, 7 (F), duty of agency to search, description by requester of records sought, in camera inspection, discovery, work produce.

(143) Forsham v. Mathews, Civ. Act, No. 75-1608 (D.D.C. Feb. 5, 1976), "agency records" (constructive possession).

(144) Fotomat Corp. v. NLRB, 92 L.R.R.M. 3708 (N.D. Ohio July 21, 1976, X7(A).

(145) Frankel v. SEC, 336 F.Supp. 675 (S.D. N.Y. 1971), rev'd 460 F.2d $13 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied 409 U.S. 889 (1972), 4, 5, 7.

(146) Fruehauf Corp. v. IRS, 369 F.Supp. 108 (E.D. Mich. 1974), aff'd and remanded 552 F.2d 284 (6th Cir. 1975), vacated and remanded 45 US.LW 3569 (Feb. 22, 1977), (a) (2) (C). X3 (26 U.S.C. §§ 6103, 7213), equity powers. (147) Fungone v. Bureau of Prisons, Civ. No. C75-2498 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 27. 1976), X5, 7, discovery, burden of proof on whether records are exempt.

(148) Furr's Cafeterias, Inc. v. NLRB, 416 F.Supp. 629 (N.D. Tex. 1976), X5, 7(D).

(149) Gates v. Schlesinger, 366 F.Supp. 797 (D.D.C. 1973), X5, "agency." (150) General Cigar Company, Inc. v. Nash, 89 L.R.R.M. 2863 (D.D.C. July 1. 1975), preliminary injunction of agency proceeding pending dispositoin of FOI

« PreviousContinue »