Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

CONTENTS

Page

Driver, William J., a president, Manufacturing Chemists Association; ac-
companied by George Best, vice president and technical director_

[blocks in formation]

Fritsch, Dr. Albert and Barry Castleman, Center for Science in the Public
Interest, Washington, D.C.; accompanied by Blake Early-

112

157

Bull, J. D., division manager, The Epcon Co., letter of February 10, 1973---
Clayton, Jacob, administrative director, Industrial Union Department,
AFL-CIO, letter of April 12, 1973__

350

357

Di Luzio, Dr. Nicholas R., professor and chairman, Department of Physi-
ology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, La., state-
ment

347

Golz, Dr. Harold H., American Petroleum Institute, letter of March 30,
1973

356

185

Selikoff, Dr. Irving J., professor, Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the
City University of New York, letter of April 27, 1973__
Sherrill, Robert, article in the New York Times--.

358

93

Shorey, Joan, Concern, Inc., statement..

364

Smith, James R., president. The American Waterways Operators, Inc.,
letter of March 28, 1973_.

354

Stephenson, C. P., secretary, United Pesticide Formulators and Dis-
tributors Association, Inc., letter of February 21, 1973_

350

Stevenson, Hon. Adlai E., III, U.S. Senator from Illinois, letter of May 4,
1973

364

TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT OF 1973

FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1973

U.S. SENATE,

COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE,

SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT,

Washington, D.C.

The subcommittee met at 10 a.m., in room 5110, New Senate Office Building, Hon. John V. Tunney presiding.

OPENING STATEMENT BY SENATOR TUNNEY

Senator TUNNEY. This morning the Subcommittee on the Environment begins 3 days of hearings designed to control toxic substances. Two bills are under consideration. I was pleased to join with the distinguished chairman of the Committee on Commerce, Senator Magnuson, and the distinguished chairman of this subcommittee, Senator Hart, in introducing S. 426, entitled the "Toxic Substances Control Act of 1973."

We are also pleased to have an administration bill, S. 888, before this subcommittee. In addition, three amendments to S. 426 have been introduced, dealing with: (1) Indemnities under this legislation and the Federal Environmental Pesticide Control Act; (2) The relationship of the Environmental Protection Agency to the Office of the Management and Budget; and (3) The monitoring of our Nation's food supply for the presence of dangerous materials.

These three amendments will also be considered in these hearings. The purpose of these hearings is to hear the testimony of concerned environmental and public interest groups, the administration, and the chemical industry concerning the substance of the legislation under consideration. In addition, we will hear testimony today and Monday about two environmental contaminants which I feel will be candidates for regulation under this legislation.

Today, scientists will present evidence of the pervasiveness and the hazardous nature of asbestos. Asbestos is an excellent example of a material with a myriad number of uses and problems.

On Monday, the witnesses will testify as to the hazards of the heavy metal, cadmium. Although a great deal of scientific work remains to be done, there is substantial indication that is not carefully regulated, cadmium may turn out to be a serious environmental hazard.

Staff members assigned to these hearings: Leonard Bickwit and Michael Brownlee.

(1)

The Committee on Commerce held extensive hearings and executive sessions on similar legislation in the last Congress. The legislation progressed to the point of being passed by both Houses of Congress. Unfortunately, passage by the House of Representatives occurred too late in the session to reconcile the differences with the Senate version.

In my view, the legislation deserves early consideration by this committee and the Congress.

In this day and age, it is intolerable that the Federal Government lacks sufficient authority to control the manufacture, use, and distribution of chemical substances which may be environmentally harmful.

Before we unleash thousands of pounds of new chemical substances into the environment, we must be assured that they will not threaten our surroundings or our health. The legislation before us would be a major step in at last giving us that assurance.

(The bills and agency comments follow :)

[ocr errors]
« PreviousContinue »