Caller-ID Technology: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Technology and the Law of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred First Congress, Second Session, on S. 2030, a Bill to Protect the Privacy of Telephone Users by Amending Title 18, United States Code, August 1, 1990, Volume 4 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 73
Page 5
... Court of Appeals ruled that caller - ID violates the state's wiretap law which is simi- lar to the Federal version . The Telephone Privacy Act would amend the Federal law to authorize caller - ID . There is yet one more reason to pass ...
... Court of Appeals ruled that caller - ID violates the state's wiretap law which is simi- lar to the Federal version . The Telephone Privacy Act would amend the Federal law to authorize caller - ID . There is yet one more reason to pass ...
Page 7
... court of appeals ruled that Caller ID violates that state's wiretap law which is similar to the federal version . My Telephone Privacy Act would amend the federal wiretap law to permit Caller ID . -- And there is one more reason to pass ...
... court of appeals ruled that Caller ID violates that state's wiretap law which is similar to the federal version . My Telephone Privacy Act would amend the federal wiretap law to permit Caller ID . -- And there is one more reason to pass ...
Page 22
... court ruled that the offering of Caller ID would violate the state wiretap laws . In the District of Columbia , the Public Service Commission voted to approve the use of Caller ID only if a blocking device is offered . And in California ...
... court ruled that the offering of Caller ID would violate the state wiretap laws . In the District of Columbia , the Public Service Commission voted to approve the use of Caller ID only if a blocking device is offered . And in California ...
Page 37
... court decision in Pennsylvania finding that Caller ID as approved by the Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission violates the Pennsylvania wiretap statute and the Pennsylvania constitution because it involves technical legal questions ...
... court decision in Pennsylvania finding that Caller ID as approved by the Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission violates the Pennsylvania wiretap statute and the Pennsylvania constitution because it involves technical legal questions ...
Page 66
... I talked about interactive TV . We had a question that came up - strangely enough - during the nomination of a Su- preme Court Justice when somebody went to a video store and found out what videos the nominee had rented . That 66.
... I talked about interactive TV . We had a question that came up - strangely enough - during the nomination of a Su- preme Court Justice when somebody went to a video store and found out what videos the nominee had rented . That 66.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abuse agencies anonymity answer AT&T Automatic Number Identification battered women believe Bell Atlantic BellSouth benefits bill Blazer call back Call Block Call Privacy Call Trace call-trace Caller ID service calling number delivery calling party identification capability Commonwealth Court Consumer Advocate CPID CULLEN currently customers dial Direct Marketing display domestic violence domestic violence intervention Electronic Communications federal GUITON harassing calls hotline incoming call individuals industry interexchange carriers issue Jersey law enforcement legislation non-published obscene calls option Pacific Bell party's PCADV pen register Pennsylvania Public Utility per-call blocking Petitioners phone calls phone company phone number police Privacy Act privacy concerns privacy rights programs Public Utility Commission receive response Return Call Senator KOHL Senator LEAHY service providers Subcommittee tariff telecommunications telemarketing telephone calls telephone company telephone number testimony trace device trap and trace users victims Wiretap Act
Popular passages
Page 73 - What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. . . . But what he seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally protected...
Page 166 - Intercept, disclose, or use that communication in the normal course of his employment while engaged in any activity which is a necessary incident to the rendition of his service or to the protection of the rights or property of the carrier of such communication: Provided,, That said communication common carriers shall not utilize service observing or random monitoring except for mechanical or service quality control checks.
Page 173 - But the inquiry must be whether there is a sufficiently close nexus between the State and the challenged action of the regulated entity so that the action of the latter may be fairly treated as that of the State itself.
Page 72 - Privacy is the claim of individuals, groups, or institutions to determine for themselves when, how, and to what extent information about them is communicated to others.
Page 240 - BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates authorizes its Executive Committee to develop specific positions consistent with the terms of this resolution on a legislative bill, regulation, or any other type of proposal which concerns the subject of the resolution including the preparation of policy papers and communications reflecting NASUCA' s position to the United States Congress.
Page 152 - electronic communications" as "any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photo electronic or photo optical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce.
Page 75 - ... trap and trace device" means a device which captures the incoming electronic or other impulses which identify the originating number of an instrument or device from which a wire or electronic communication was transmitted...
Page 67 - Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee: I greatly appreciate the opportunity to testify before you today on behalf of the...
Page 375 - ... (B) The Commission shall include in its examination a study of — (i) whether a person engaged in interstate commerce who maintains a mailing list should be required to remove an individual's name and address from such list upon request of that individual...
Page 173 - Only by sifting facts and weighing circumstances can the nonobvious involvement of the State in private conduct be attributed its true significance.