 | Levi Hedge - Logic - 1821 - 188 pages
...Norrisian Professor in Ihe University in Cambridge. They may also be found in Kinvan's logick, vol. 2, consider each other, as standing on a footing of equality in respect to the subject in debate. Each should regard the other as possessing equal talents, knowledge, and desire for truth, •with... | |
 | Samuel Hazard - Pennsylvania - 1831 - 438 pages
...argumentation — every man's reason has the same pedigree — it begins and ends with himself. Hence the parties should mutually consider each other as...standing on a footing of equality, in respect to the question under debate. "A provincial dialect, and even bad grammar cannot vitiate an argument, if the... | |
 | S. E. Parker - Logic - 1837 - 344 pages
...controversy at once. The want of it is often the sole origin from which controversy and all the unpleasantry attending it arises. Rule 2. The parties should mutually...that he may be wrong and his adversary in the right. (The latter part of this rule, in certain cases, must be taken cum grano salis.) , Rule 3. All expressions... | |
 | S. E. PARKER - Logic - 1838 - 340 pages
...controversy at once. The want of it is often the sole origin from which controversy and all the unpleasantry attending it arises. Rule 2. The parties should mutually...that he may be wrong and his adversary in the right. (The latter part of this rule, in certain cases, must be taken cum grano salis.} Rule 3. All expressions... | |
 | Richard Green Parker, Charles Fox - English language - 1841 - 290 pages
...point at issue, should be so clearly defined, that there can be no misunderstanding respecting them. 2. The parties should mutually consider each other,...footing of equality in respect to the subject in debate. Each should consider the other as possessing equal talents, knowledge, and desire for truth, with himself;... | |
 | Alexander Campbell - Baptism - 1844 - 922 pages
...point at issue, should be clearly defined, that there could be no misunderetanding respecting them. erning Each should regard the other as possessing equal talents, knowledge, and a desire for truth with himself;... | |
 | Levi Hedge - Logic - 1854 - 204 pages
...different apprehensions of the question. 215. Rule 2 d. The parties should mutually consider each oiher, as standing on a footing of equality in respect to the subject in debate. Each should regard the other as possessing equal talents, knowledge, and desire for truth\ with himself... | |
 | Moses Hull - Spiritualism - 1904 - 460 pages
...at issue should be so clearly denned that there could be no misunderstanding respecting them. 2nd. The parties should mutually consider each other as...footing of equality in respect to the subject in debate. Each should regard the other as possessing equal talents, knowledge, and desire for truth with himself;... | |
 | Joseph R. McElrath, Jr., Robert C. Leitz, Jesse S. Crisler - Literary Collections - 2001 - 644 pages
...protracted, because the parties engaged in it have different apprehensions of the question. 215. Rule 2d. The parties should mutually consider each other as...footing of equality in respect to the subject in debate. Each should regard the other as possessing equal talents, knowledge, and desire for truth with himself;... | |
| |
The parties should mutually consider each other as standing on a footing of equality in respect to the subject in debate. Each should regard the other as possessing equal talents, knowledge, and desire for truth with himself; and that it is possible,... 