Government Contract Law CasesJames O. Mahoy School of Systems and Logistics, Air Force Institute of Technology, 1975 - Government publications - 889 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 28
... determination of the amounts due the estate by the United States on this claim and cross - claim if the probate court had jurisdiction to render the order against the petitioner . Whether that jurisdiction exists depends upon the effect ...
... determination of the amounts due the estate by the United States on this claim and cross - claim if the probate court had jurisdiction to render the order against the petitioner . Whether that jurisdiction exists depends upon the effect ...
Page 62
... determination of factual issues . Without a determination of arbitrariness of that the trial court finding was without record support , an appellate court will not ordinarily disturb a finding that the applicant for a subpoena complied ...
... determination of factual issues . Without a determination of arbitrariness of that the trial court finding was without record support , an appellate court will not ordinarily disturb a finding that the applicant for a subpoena complied ...
Page 74
... determination of contract invalidity . Clark v . United States ( 1877 ) , 95 U.S. 539 ; South Boston Iron Co. v . United States ( 1886 ) , 118 U.S. 37 ; Salomon v . United States ( 1873 ) , 86 U.S. 17 ; 154 ALR 356 ; 110 ALR 154 ; 84 ...
... determination of contract invalidity . Clark v . United States ( 1877 ) , 95 U.S. 539 ; South Boston Iron Co. v . United States ( 1886 ) , 118 U.S. 37 ; Salomon v . United States ( 1873 ) , 86 U.S. 17 ; 154 ALR 356 ; 110 ALR 154 ; 84 ...
Page 75
... determination . To make the Government liable for more than benefits received would , in effect , permit agents of ... determinations would be nullified . Such result is opposed to the public interest . Accordingly , we would have no ...
... determination . To make the Government liable for more than benefits received would , in effect , permit agents of ... determinations would be nullified . Such result is opposed to the public interest . Accordingly , we would have no ...
Page 94
... bidder requests permission to correct a mistake in his bid and clear and convincing evidence establishes both the existence of a mistake and the bid actually intended , a determination permitting the bidder to correct the mistake may be 94.
... bidder requests permission to correct a mistake in his bid and clear and convincing evidence establishes both the existence of a mistake and the bid actually intended , a determination permitting the bidder to correct the mistake may be 94.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acceptance accord and satisfaction action administrative Administrative Procedure Act advertising Aerojet agency agreement Air Force aircraft alleged allowed amended amount appellant appellant's applied ASBCA ASPR assignment authority award basis bidder Board Boeing cancellation clause Company competitive Comptroller conclusion considered construction contract price contracting officer contracting officer's contractor Corp Corporation cost Court of Claims Cutler-Hammer decision defendant defendant's delivery schedule denied determination discount District Court engine entitled equitable adjustment executive fact Federal funds furnished Government contracts Government's gross mistakes incurred inspection issue limited Lukens Steel Co manufacture ment negotiations offerors opinion overrun paragraph parties payment performance plaintiff polystyrene prior procurement production proposal pursuant reasonable record regulations request responsible result section 8(a small business specifications statute statutory subcontractor submitted summary judgment Supp supplies supra surety technical termination Uniform Commercial Code United vessels
Popular passages
Page 131 - Courts are not the only agency of government that must be assumed to have capacity to govern.
Page 44 - The case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari which we granted because of the importance of the problem and the contrariety of views in the courts.
Page 131 - Some play must be allowed for the joints of the machine, and it must be remembered that legislatures are ultimate guardians of the liberties and welfare of the people in quite as great a degree as the courts" (Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry.
Page 365 - If any such change causes an increase or decrease in the cost of, or the time required for, performance of this contract, an equitable adjustment shall be made in the contract price or delivery schedule, or both, and the contract shall be modified in writing accordingly.
Page 782 - Except with respect to defaults of subcontractors, the Contractor shall not be liable for any excess costs if the failure to perform the contract arises out of causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor.
Page 885 - He shall be similarly responsible for all damages to persons or property that occur as a result of his fault or negligence.
Page 66 - A President and those who assist him must be free to explore alternatives in the process of shaping policies and making decisions and to do so in a way many would be unwilling to express except privately.
Page 131 - The other is that while unconstitutional exercise of power by the executive and legislative branches of the government is subject to judicial restraint, the only check upon our own exercise of power is our own sense of self-restraint.
Page 543 - That all persons employed by the contractor in the manufacture or furnishing of the materials, supplies, articles, or equipment used in the performance of the contract will be paid, without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account, not less than the minimum wages as determined by the Secretary of Labor to be the prevailing minimum wages for persons employed on similar work or in the particular or similar industries or groups of industries currently operating in the locality in which the materials,...
Page 730 - No Government contract shall contain a provision making final on a question of law the decision of any administrative official, representative, or board.