« PreviousContinue »
than 60 days or less than 30 days prior to such date.
(ii) A notification of the actual date of initial startup of a source within 15 days after such date.
(8) Within 60 days after achieving the maximum production rate at which the source will be operated but not later than 180 days after initial startup of such source, the owner or operator of such source shall conduct a performance test(s) in accordance with the methods and under operating conditions approved by the Administrator and furnish the Administrator a written report of the results of such performance test.
(1) Such test shall be at the expense of the owner or operator.
(i) The Administrator may monitor such test and also may conduct performance tests.
(iii) The owner or operator of a source shall provide the Administrator 15 days prior notice of the performance test to afford the Administrator the opportunity to have an observer present.
(iv) The Administrator may walve the requirement for performance tests if the owner or operator of a source has demonstrated by other means to the Administrator's satisfaction that the source is being operated in compliance with the requirements of $ 52.126(b).
(9) Approval to construct or modify shall not relieve the owner or operator of the responsibility to comply with all local, State, or Federal regulations which are part of the applicable plan. (37 FR 15081, July 27, 1972, as amended at 38 FR 12705, May 14, 1972) $ 52.130 Source surveillance.
(a) The requirements of g 51.19(a) of this chapter are not met since the plan does not contain legally enforceable procedures for requiring sources in Gila, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties in the Phoenix-Tucson Intrastate Region and in the Arizona portions of the ArizonaNew Mexico Southern Border, ClarkMohave, and Four Corners Interstate Regions to maintain records of and periodically report on the nature and amounts of emissions.
(b) The requirements of g 51.19(d) of this chapter are not met because the plan does not provide procedures for obtain ing and maintaining data on actual
emission reductions achieved as a result of implementing transportation control measures.
(c) Regulation for source recordkeeping and reporting.-(1) The owner or operator of any stationary source in the counties of Gila, Pinal, and Santa Cruz in the Phoenix-Tucson Intrastate Region ($ 81.36 of this chapter); or the Arizona portions of the Four Corners, Clark-Mohave, or Arizona-New Mexico Southern Border Interstate Regions (88 81.121, 81.80, and 81.99 of this chapter), shall, upon notification from the Administrator, maintain records of the nature and amounts of emissions from such source or any other information as may be deemed necessary by the Administrator to determine whether such source is in compliance with applicable emission limitations or other control measures.
(2) The information recorded shall be summarized and reported to the Administrator, and shall be submitted within 45 days after the end of the reporting period. Reporting periods are January 1 to June 30 and July 1 to December 31, except that the initial reporting period shall commence on the date the Administrator issues notification of the recordkeeping requirements.
(3) Information recorded by the owner or operator and copies of the summarizing reports submitted to the Administrator shall be retained by the owner or operator for 2 years after the date on which the pertinent report is submitted.
(4) Emission data obtained from owners or operators of stationary sources will be correlated with applicable emission limitations and other control measures. All such emission data will be available during normal business hours at the regional office (region DX), The Administrator will designate one or more places in Arizona where such emission data and correlations will be available for public inspection (37 FR 15081, July 27, 1972, as amended at 38 FR 12705, May 14, 1973; 38 FR 16564, June 22, 1973) $ 52.131 Attainment dates for national
standards. The following table presents the latest dates by which the national standards are to be attained. These dates reflect the information presented in Arizona's plaii, except where noted.
Photochemical Prie Secon- || Pri- Secon- Nitrogen i Carboni oxidants m ary dary mary dary | dioxide monoxide i (hydrocarbons)!
NOTE.-Dates or footnotes which are underlined are prescribed by the Administrator because the plan does not provide a specific date or the date provided is not acceptable.
2. July 1975. b. Five years from plan approval or promulgation. C. Air quality levels presently below secondary standards. d. Transportation and/or land use control strategy to be submitted no later than April 15, 1973.
e. Transportation and/or land use control strategy will be proposed by the Administrator. 1. Eighteen-month extension granted. 137 FR 15082, July 27, 1972, as amended at 38 FR 7325, Mar. 20, 1973; 38 FR 7556, Mar. 23, 1973; 38 FR 12711, May 14, 1973) 8 52.132 Transportation and land use strategies, and emission controls on bulk controls.
tank farms and service station under(a) To complete the requirements of
ground storage tanks. $ 51.11 (b) and 51.14 of this chapter, the
(38 FR 7325, Mar. 20, 1973, as amended at Governor of Arizona must submit to the
38 FR 16564, June 22, 1973) Administrator:
$ 52.133 Rules and regulations. (1) No later than April 15, 1973, trans
(a) Regulation 7-1-1.4(A) (excepportation and/or land use control stra
tions) provides for an exemption from tegies and a demonstration that said
enforcement action if the violation is strategies, along with Arizona's pres
attributable to certain events. These ently adopted stationary source emission limitations for carbon monoxide and hy
events are too broad in scope and the
source can obtain the exemption merely drocarbons and the Federal Motor Ve
by reporting the occurrence. Therefore, hicle Control Program, will attain and
Regulations 7-1-1.4(A) of the Arizona maintain the national standards for car
Rules and Regulations for Air Pollution bon monoxide and photochemical oxi
Control is disapproved since this regdants in the Phoenix-Tucson Intrastate
ulation makes all approved emission Region by May 31, 1975. By such date
limiting regulations potentially (April 15, 1973), the State also must submit a detailed timetable for imple
unenforceable. menting the legislative authority, regu (37 FR 16082, July 27, 1972) lations, and administrative policies re
$ 52.134 Compliance schedules. quired for carrying out the transportation and/or land use control strategies
(a) Federal compliance schedule.-(1) by May 31, 1975.
Except as provided in paragraph (a) (2) (2) No later than July 30. 1973. the of this section, the owner or operator of legislative authority that is needed for
any stationary source subject to $ 52.126 carrying out such strategies.
(b) shall comply with such regulation (3) No later than December 30, 1973, on or before January 31, 1974. The owner the necessary regulations and adminis or operator of the source subject to trative policies needed to implement $ 52.125(c) shall comply with such reguother transportation and/or land-use lation at initial start-up of such source
unless & compliance schedule has been submitted pursuant to paragraph (a) (2) of this section.
(i) Any owner or operator in compliance with $ 52.126(b) on the effective date of this regulation shall certify such compliance to the Administrator no later than 120 days following the effective date of this paragraph.
(ii) Any owner or operator who achieves compliance with $ 52.125(c) or $ 52.126(b) after the effective date of this regulation shall certify such compliance to the Administrator within 5 days of the date compliance is achieved.
(2) Any owner or operator of the stationary source subject to $ 52.125(c) and
agraph (a) (1) of this section may, no later than July 23, 1973, submit to the Administrator for approval a proposed compliance schedule that demonstrates compliance with $ 52.125(c) as expeditiously as practicable but no later than March 15, 1976. Any owner or operator of a stationary source subject to $ 52.126(b) and paragraph (a) (1) of this section may, no later than 120 days following the effective date of this paragraph, submit to the Administrator for approval a proposed compliance schedule that demonstrates compliance with $ 52.126(b) as expeditiously as practicable but not later than July 31, 1975.
(i) The compliance schedule shall provide for periodic increments of progress toward compliance. The dates for achievement of such increments shall be specified. Increments of progress shall include, but not be limited to: submittal of the final control plan to the Administrator; letting of necessary contracts for construction or process change, or issuance of orders for the purchase of component parts to accomplish emission control equipment or process modification; completion of onsite construction or installation of emission control equipment or process modification; and final compliance.
(ii) Any compliance schedule for the stationary source subject to $ 52.125(c) which extends beyond July 31. 1975, shall apply any reasonable interim measures of control designed to reduce the impact of such source on public health.
(3) Any owner or operator who submits a compliance schedule pursuant to this paragraph shall, within 5 days after the deadline for each increment of progress, certify to the Administrator whether or not the required increment of the approved compliance schedule has been met. (38 FR 12705, May 14, 1973] $ 52.135 Resources.
(a) The requirements of $ 51.20 are not met because the transportation control plan does not contain a sufficient description of resources available to the State and local agencies and of addi. tional resources needed to carry out the plan during the 5-year period following submittal. [38 FR 16664, June 22, 1973) $ 52.136 Control strategy: Carbon mon
oxide. (a) The requirements of $ 51.14 are not met because the plan does not provide for attainment and maintenance of the national standards for carbon monoxide in the Phoenix-Tucson intrastate regions by May 31, 1975.
(b) The requirements of $ 51.14(a) (2) are not met because the plan does not provide a description of enforcement methods, and proposed rules and regulations pertaining to the selected transportation control measures.
(c) The requirements of $ 51.14(b) are not met because the plan contains an air bleed, catalytic retrofit, and loaded in. spection control measures which cannot be implemented in time to contribute to the attainment of the national standards for carbon monoxide by May 31, 1975. In addition, implementation of the heavyduty vehicle retrofit and inspection control measures cannot be assured, even by mid-1977. (38 FR 16564, June 22, 1973)
Subpart E-Arkansas SOURCE: 37 FR 10850, May 31, 1972, unless otherwise noted. $ 52.170 Identification of plan.
(a) Title of plan: "Arkansas Plan of Implementation for Air Pollution Con. trol.”
(b) The plan was officially submitted (2) July 7, 1972. on January 28, 1972.
[37 FR 10850, May 31, 1972, as amended at (c) Supplemental information was 37 FR 19808, Sept. 22, 1972) submitted on: (1) January 25 and February 24, 1972,
§ 52.171 Classification of regions. by the State of Arkansas, Department of The Arkansas plan was evaluated on Pollution Control and Ecology; and the basis of the following classifications:
Air quality control region
oxides Nitrogen Carbon o xidants Pri-Secon- Pri- Secon-dioxide | monoxide || (hydrocarbons) maryl dary || maryl dary
NOTE: Dates or footnotes which are underlined are prescribed by the Administrator because the plan did not provide a specific date or the date provided was not acceptable.
&. July 1975.
C. Air quality levels presently below secondary standards.
(c) Supplemental information was SOURCE: 37 FR 10850, May 31, 1972. unless submitted on: otherwise noted.
(1) April 3, 10, 19, 21, 26, May 5 and
July 19, 1972, by the California Air Re§ 52.220 Identification of plan.
sources Board (a) Title of plan: "The State of Cali
(2) June 30, 1972. fornia Implementation Plan for Achiev
[37 FR 10850, May 31, 1972, as amended at
37 FR 19812, Sept. 22, 1972) ing and Maintaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standards”.
$ 52.221 Classification of regions. (b) The plan was officially submitted The California plan was evaluated on on February 21, 1972.
the basis of the following classifications: