United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volume 276United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1928 - Courts |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 7
... Company of New York ; Same v . New York & Queens Gas Company ; Same v . Central Union Gas Company ; Same v . Northern Union Gas Company ; Same v . New York Mutual Gas Light Company ; Same v . Standard Gas Light Company of the City of ...
... Company of New York ; Same v . New York & Queens Gas Company ; Same v . Central Union Gas Company ; Same v . Northern Union Gas Company ; Same v . New York Mutual Gas Light Company ; Same v . Standard Gas Light Company of the City of ...
Page 9
... Company in the Supreme Court of New York under Sec . 473 , New York Civil Practice Act , wherein he sought and obtained a declaratory judgment reciting that that Company had no valid claim against him for return of any part of the ...
... Company in the Supreme Court of New York under Sec . 473 , New York Civil Practice Act , wherein he sought and obtained a declaratory judgment reciting that that Company had no valid claim against him for return of any part of the ...
Page 22
... company at the place of business in the county , but that if there was no officer in the county , then the company might be notified by publication and mail in like manner and with like effect as is provided in the rules of chancery ...
... company at the place of business in the county , but that if there was no officer in the county , then the company might be notified by publication and mail in like manner and with like effect as is provided in the rules of chancery ...
Page 29
... Company , or upon the ground that Linstead , when on the lines of the Chesa- peake and Ohio Railway Company , was doing the work of that Company and not work of the Big Four Company . Linstead's service was for his own company , as was ...
... Company , or upon the ground that Linstead , when on the lines of the Chesa- peake and Ohio Railway Company , was doing the work of that Company and not work of the Big Four Company . Linstead's service was for his own company , as was ...
Page 30
... Company , known as the Big Four , but who was working upon a freight train run- ning upon the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company's tracks between Stevens , Kentucky , and Riverside , Ohio , near Cincinnati . The question in the case is ...
... Company , known as the Big Four , but who was working upon a freight train run- ning upon the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company's tracks between Stevens , Kentucky , and Riverside , Ohio , near Cincinnati . The question in the case is ...
Contents
xxxiii | |
61 | |
94 | |
105 | |
173 | |
180 | |
212 | |
242 | |
340 | |
393 | |
410 | |
472 | |
490 | |
503 | |
517 | |
537 | |
282 | |
303 | |
313 | |
333 | |
566 | |
575 | |
599 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adjudged affirmed alleged amended amount application Argument Ass'n Attorney authorized bankrupt bankruptcy bill brief carriers cars CERTIORARI Chesapeake & Ohio Circuit Court claim clause Co-op Commission common law Congress Constitution contract corporation County Court of Appeals creditors curtesy decision declared decree delivered the opinion District Court divisions duty evidence ex rel February February 20 federal court fees filed Fleet Corp'n Fourteenth Amendment Growers guanidine held interest interstate commerce Interstate Commerce Commission joint rates judgment jurisdiction JUSTICE land liability ment Messrs Mills Corporation negligence officers Ohio R. R. operation paid parties partnership patent person petition petitioner plaintiff in error prescribed proceedings purchase question R. R. Co railroad company Railway reasonable received regulation respondent reversed rule Stat statute subpoena suit supra Supreme Court taxicabs Texas tion Tobacco Trust United violation Western Union writ writ of certiorari
Popular passages
Page 457 - Nothing in these rules shall exonerate any vessel, or the owner or master or crew thereof, from the consequences of any neglect to carry lights or signals, or of any neglect to keep a proper lookout, or of the neglect of any precaution which may be required by the ordinary practice of seamen, or by the special circumstances of the case.
Page 480 - ... nothing in this Act contained shall in any way abridge or alter the remedies now existing at common law or by statute, but the provisions of this Act are in addition to such remedies...
Page 112 - ... will, under honest, efficient and economical management and reasonable expenditures for maintenance of way, structures and equipment, earn an aggregate annual net railway operating income equal, as nearly as may be, to a fair return upon the aggregate value of the railway property of such carriers held for and used in the service of transportation...
Page 220 - ... pass to the trustee as a part of the estate of the bankrupt...
Page 269 - ... made or Intended to take effect in possession or enjoyment after the death of the grantor...
Page 457 - Where by any of these Rules one of two vessels is to keep out of the way, the other shall keep her course and speed.
Page 111 - ... any other fact or circumstance which would ordinarily, without regard to the mileage haul, entitle one carrier to a greater or less proportion than another carrier of the joint rate, fare or charge.
Page 405 - is between the delegation of power to make the law, which necessarily involves a discretion as to what it shall be, and conferring authority or discretion as to its execution, to be exercised under and in pursuance of the law. The first cannot be done ; to the latter no valid objection can be made.
Page 529 - an unconstitutional assumption of powers by the courts of the United States which no lapse of time or respectable array of opinion should make us hesitate to correct.
Page 425 - It shall be unlawful for any person to purchase, sell, dispense, or distribute any of the aforesaid drugs except in the original stamped package or from the original stamped package; and the absence of appropriate tax-paid stamps from any of the aforesaid drugs shall be prima facie evidence of a violation of this section by the person in whose possession same may be found...