1964 NASA Authorization: Hearings Before the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U. S. House of Representatives, Eighty-eighth Congress, First Session, on H. R. 5466 (superseded by H. R. 7500) ... |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 16
... Costs are not , therefore , allocated to international programs as such ; the foreign participation actually represents a net contribution to NASA programs and , often , a reduction in their cost . If one were to estimate very roughly the ...
... Costs are not , therefore , allocated to international programs as such ; the foreign participation actually represents a net contribution to NASA programs and , often , a reduction in their cost . If one were to estimate very roughly the ...
Page 35
... Costs are not , therefore , allocated to international programs as such ; the foreign participation actually represents a net contribution to NASA programs and , often , a reduction in their cost . If one were to estimate very roughly the ...
... Costs are not , therefore , allocated to international programs as such ; the foreign participation actually represents a net contribution to NASA programs and , often , a reduction in their cost . If one were to estimate very roughly the ...
Page 35
... cost stems from continued contractor buildup in spacecraft development effort . This buildup is just now leveling off ; fiscal year 1964 is expected to be the peak year for spacecraft funding . Most of the remaining increase is for ...
... cost stems from continued contractor buildup in spacecraft development effort . This buildup is just now leveling off ; fiscal year 1964 is expected to be the peak year for spacecraft funding . Most of the remaining increase is for ...
Page 65
... cost stems from continued contractor buildup in spacecraft development effort . This buildup is just now leveling off ; fiscal year 1964 is expected to be the peak year for spacecraft funding . Most of the remaining increase is for ...
... cost stems from continued contractor buildup in spacecraft development effort . This buildup is just now leveling off ; fiscal year 1964 is expected to be the peak year for spacecraft funding . Most of the remaining increase is for ...
Page 103
... cost of the program . This goes back to the Bellcomm contract and the G.E. contract . Now can you tell us what the cost per year is of the Bell- comm contract as it exists today ? Dr. SEAMANS . I can't give you the exact amount . I ...
... cost of the program . This goes back to the Bellcomm contract and the G.E. contract . Now can you tell us what the cost per year is of the Bell- comm contract as it exists today ? Dr. SEAMANS . I can't give you the exact amount . I ...
Contents
798 | |
799 | |
831 | |
833 | |
842 | |
873 | |
899 | |
921 | |
351 | |
371 | |
405 | |
429 | |
495 | |
517 | |
565 | |
589 | |
615 | |
639 | |
663 | |
681 | |
757 | |
773 | |
957 | |
1009 | |
1037 | |
1071 | |
1087 | |
1113 | |
1141 | |
1191 | |
1237 | |
1247 | |
1285 | |
1353 | |
1400 | |
Common terms and phrases
Air Force Apollo program Apollo spacecraft assembly astronauts Bellcomm booster budget capability Chairman checkout Colonel GOULD command module committee construction contract contractor Control Center cost DADDARIO Department of Defense diborane Director Earth orbit equipment estimate evaluation FIGURE fiscal year 1964 fuel FULTON of Pennsylvania funds Gemini program going GURNEY HOLMES HORNBECK Houston Laboratory launch vehicle lunar excursion module lunar landing lunar orbit lunar orbit rendezvous McDonnell ment Mercury military million mission Mission Control Center Moon NASA NASA's Office orbit rendezvous payload percent PETERSEN pounds problems procurement Project Apollo Project Gemini Project Mercury propellants question reentry reliability requested research and development RIEHLMAN rocket ROUDEBUSH S-IV satellite Saturn I-B schedule SCHRIEVER SEAMANS service module SIEPERT slide fig SLOOP space program specific stage studies subcontracts TEAGUE technical thrust tion Titan Titan II WAGGONNER YEAGER
Popular passages
Page 35 - ... the Secretary of Defense determines that deferral of such construction for inclusion in the next military construction authorization Act would be inconsistent with interests of national security, and In connection therewith to acquire, construct, convert, rehabilitate, or Install permanent or temporary public works including land acquisition, site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, and equipment...
Page 246 - Director of the George C. Marshall Space Flight Center of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Huntsville, Ala.
Page 35 - Army missions and responsibilities which have been occasioned by: (a) unforeseen security considerations, (b) new weapons developments, (c) new and unforeseen research and development requirements, or (d) improved production schedules, if the Secretary of Defense determines that deferral of such construction for inclusion in the next military construction authorization...
Page 35 - Provided, That such amounts of this appropriation as may be determined by the Secretary of Defense may be transferred to such appropriations of the Department of Defense available for military construction as he may designate...
Page 35 - Army or his designee, shall notify the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives, immediately upon reaching a final decision to implement, of the cost of construction of any public work undertaken under this section, including those real estate actions pertaining thereto.
Page 35 - Provided further, That such amounts of this appropriation as may be determined by the Secretary of Defense may be transferred to carry out the purposes of advanced research to those appropriations for military functions under the Department of Defense which are being utilized for related programs, to be merged with and to be available for the same time period as the appropriation to which transferred.
Page 35 - IV of this Act, may, in the discretion of the Secretary concerned, be increased by 5 per centum for projects inside the United States (other than Alaska) and by 10 per centum for projects outside the United States or in Alaska, if he determines in the case of any particular project that such increase (1) is required for the sole purpose of meeting unusual variations in cost arising in connection with that project, and (2) could not have been reasonably anticipated at the time such project was submitted...
Page 35 - I, necessary for basic and applied scientific research, development, test, and evaluation ; advanced research projects as may be designated and determined by the Secretary of Defense, pursuant to law...
Page 16 - British aircraft industry into spacecraft engineering, the formal establishment of the European Space Research Organization (ESRO) and the European Launcher Development Organization (ELDO) and finally of the successful first test flight of a large new booster by ELDO.
Page 35 - Defense available for research, development, test, and evaluation, or procurement or production related thereto, to be merged with and to be available for the same purposes, and for the same time period, as the appropriation to which transferred...