(3) actions and proposed actions to promote dual use betwe the reserve component forces and civilian law enforceme agencies of the Department of Defense aircraft and other partment of Defense resources made available to civilian la enforcement agencies for the purpose of carrying out dru interdiction missions. * SKC, 1424 STUDY ON THE USE OF THE E-2 AIRCRAFT FOR DRUG Sety BY SECRETARY OF THE NAVY.-The Secretary of the Navy shall conduct a test of the use of E-2 aircraft of the Na to determine the effectiveness of that aircraft in drug interdiction the study shall be conducted along the border between the Unite M-450x and Mexico and shall be carried out over a period of (5) COLLECTION OF DATA.-As part of the test, the Secretar shall collect data on the contribution on the use of the E-2 aircr to the apprehension of drug smugglers. This data shall include th number of intercepts which resulted in apprehensions. (C) REPORT-Not later than September 30, 1986, the Secretar shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the study. SEÇ, IE25. STRATEGIC BOMBER PROGRAMS (4) SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY BOMBER AND THE ADVANCED CRUISE MISSILE.—It is the sense Congress that (D) the capabilities inherent in the technologies associate with the Advanced Technology Bomber program and the A vanced Cruise Missile program are a critical national security asset for maintaining an adequate and credible deterrent pos ture: (2) such technologies and programs should be developed & pully as feasible in order to produce and deploy advanced systems which will complicate the military planning of the So viet Union and as a consequence enhance the deterrent posture of the United States; (D) such technologies and programs should be funded at the lovels authorized in this Act; and all the funds appropriated for such programs should be fully used for such programs. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR ATB AND ACM FOR ANY HER PURPOSE.-None of the funds appropriated pursuant to an Authorisation of appropriations in this Act to carry out the Adced technology Bomber program or the Advanced Cruise Misogram may be used for any other purpose. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON B-1B BOMBER PROGRAM.-It is the of Congress that, consistent with the stated policy of the Dement of Defense, the B-1B bomber aircraft procurement proshould be terminated after acquisition under such program of tions to pr as av d) LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF B-1B AIRCRAFT TO BE PROes and RED.-None of the funds appropriated pursuant to an authorizaof Defense in contained in this Act may be obligated or expended for the conct of research, design, demonstration, development, or procureent of more than 100 B-1B bomber aircraft (including any deriva7e or modified version of such aircraft). s made ava purpose of 2 HE E-2 ABR NAVY-The C. 1426. RESTRICTIONS ON CERTAIN NUCLEAR PROGRAMS (a) RESTRICTION ON FUNDING FOR MX MISSILE WARHEAD.-None the funds appropriated pursuant to an authorization provided in his or any other Act may be obligated or expended for the producon of W-87 warheads for the MX missile program in excess of the umbers of warheads required to arm the number of such missiles f-uthorized by the Congress to be deployed and determined by the rerat resident to be necessary for quality assurance and reliability testborder being. dout or (b) EMPLOYMENT OF THE STANDARD MISSILE (SM-2(N)).—Except or the studies and report required by this section, none of the the unds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be expended be used or research, development, test, or procurement associated with a data suclear variant of the Standard Missile (SM-2(N)) or any associited nuclear warhead until 30 calendar days after the Secretary of he Navy submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives 45 a report which includes the folowing information: rehensions 30. 1986 2 ts of the TANCED A natio le deta Se dere pley & ((1) A description of the circumstances under which the SM2(N) would be used and an assessment of likely enemy response (including countermeasures). (2) A description of the release procedures and circumstances under which release would be authorized for employment of the SM-2(N). (3) An analysis of conventional alternatives to the SM-2(N), including any necessary modification to the SM-2 or alternative to the Standard Missile or warhead, and the associated costs of those alternatives. (4) A summary of all studies previously conducted analyzing the impact of the use of nuclear naval surface-to-air missiles on our own vessels and electronics. (5) A list of all United States ships which may receive the SM-2(N). (6) The number of additional conventional armed missiles which could be carried by United States_ships if the SM-2(N) were not deployed and the impact on fleet air defense from that reduced conventional load. (7) Any plans or programs for the development of a nuclear naval surface-to-air or air-to-air missile for fleet defense other than the SM-2(N). (c) REPORT ON REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIALS. (1) Not later than March 1, 1986, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy, after consultation with the Joint 45 Sec. 1(a)(1) of Public Law 104-14 (109 Stat. 186) provided that references to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives shall be treated as referring to the Committee on National Security of the House of Representatives. The Committee on National Security subsequently returned to the name "Committee on Armed Services"; see sec. 1067 of Public Law 106-65 (113 Stat. 774). Chiefs of Staff and the Director of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, shall submit a report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives 45 detailing the military requirements for special nuclear materials through fiscal year 1991. The report shall include findings and recommendations concerning (A) requirements for production of plutonium, highly enriched uranium, and other special nuclear materials; and (B) the recovery of special nuclear materials for military uses that have been transferred from military uses to civilian research and development uses. (2) The report should also (A) address the availability of special nuclear materials to be derived from the retirement of existing nuclear weapons; (B) address the feasibility of meeting military needs for special nuclear materials through the blending of high grade and low grade materials stocks; (C) assess the impact of new materials separation, purification, and production technologies on nuclear proliferation: and (D) contain the views of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Director of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. * PART E-MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS SEC. 1451. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON INTRODUCTION OF ARMED FORCES INTO NICARAGUA FOR COMBAT It is the sense of Congress that United States Armed Forces should not be introduced into or over Nicaragua for combat. However, nothing in this section shall be construed as affecting the authority and responsibility of the President or Congress under the Constitution, statutes, or treaties of the United States in force. SEC. 1452. SENSE OF CONGRESS CONCERNING PROTECTION OF UNITED STATES MILITARY PERSONNEL AGAINST TERRORISM (a) FINDING.-The Congress finds that the protection of members of the Armed Forces against terrorist activity is among the highest national security concerns of the United States. (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.-Therefore, it is the sense of Congress that (1) the President should be supported in the vigorous exercise of his powers as Commander-in-Chief to protect members of the Armed Forces against terrorist activity; and (2) such exercise of power should include the use of such measures as may be appropriate and consistent with law. SEC. 1453. READINESS OF SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES (1) the first duty of the Government is to provide for the common defense, including safeguarding the peace, safety, and security of the citizens of the United States; (2) the incidence of terrorist, guerrilla, and other violent threats to citizens and property of the United States has rapidly in ed; r of the Arms a report to d House of is for special: rt shall in ction of pla al nuclear lear mater 1 military pecial nuclear ting nuclea ting military blending terials se on nuclear hiefs of Suf ament VISIONS (3) the special operations forces of the Armed Forces provide the United States with immediate and primary capability to respond to terrorism; and (4) the special operations forces are the military mainstay of the United States for the purposes of nation-building and training friendly foreign forces in order to preclude deployment or combat involving the conventional or strategic forces of the United States. (b) SENSE OF THE CONGRESS.-In view of the findings in subction (a), it is the sense of the Congress that (1) the revitalization of the capability of the special operations forces of the Armed Forces should be pursued as a matter of the highest priority; (2) personnel and other resources allocations should reflect the priority referred to in paragraph (1); (3) the political and military sensitivity and the importance to national security of the special operations forces require that the Office of the Secretary of Defense should improve its management supervision of such forces in all aspects of the special operations mission area; (4) the joint command and control of the special operations forces must permit direct and immediate access by the President and Secretary of Defense; and (5) the commanders-in-chief of the unified commands should have available, within their operational areas of responsibility, sufficient special operations assets to execute the operations plans for which they are responsible or to support additional contingency operations directed from the national level. "DUCTION BAT tates A * a for Is affer cc. Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1985 Partial text of Public Law 98-525 [H.R. 5167], 98 Stat. 2492, Approved Ort ber 19, 1984 as amended by Public Law 99-145 [Department of Defens Authorization Act, 1986; S. 1160], 99 Stat. 619, Public Law 99-661 N tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1987, S. 2368] 100 St 3816, approved November 14, 1986; Public Law 100-456 [National Defens Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 1989; H.R. 4481], 102 Stat. 1918, approf September 29, 1988; Public Law 101-189 [National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991; H.R. 2461], 103 Stat. 1352, appro November 29, 1989; Public Law 101-510 [National Defense Authorizati Act for Fiscal Year 1991, H.R. 4739], 104 Stat. 1485, approved Novembe 5, 1990; Public Law 102-190 [National Defense Authorization Act for cal Years 1992 and 1993, H.R. 2100], 105 Stat. 1290, approved Decente 5, 1991; Public Law 102-484 [National Defense Authorization Act for cal Year 1993; H.R. 5006], 106 Stat. 2315, approved October 23, 1992; Pa lic Law 103-160 [National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1 H.R. 24011, 107 Stat. 1547, approved November 30, 1993; Public Law 337 [National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995; S. 2182], Stat. 2663, approved October 5, 1994; Public Law 104-106 [National fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996; S. 1124], 110 Stat. 186, proved February 10, 1996; Public Law 104-201 [National Defense Author ization Act for Fiscal Year 1997; H.R. 3230], 110 Stat. 2422, approved Se tember 23, 1996; and by Public Law 106-65 [National Defense Author tion Act for Fiscal Year 2000; S. 1059], 113 Stat. 512, approved October 1999 AN ACT To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1985 for the military function of the Department of Defense, to prescribe military personnel levels for that fis year for the Department of Defense, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, fiscal year 1985 for activities of the Under Secretary of Defense for Sec. 105. (a) Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for Research and Engineering for acquisition in connection with coop erative programs of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as fol lows: For acquisition of the Patriot missile system for the Federal Republic of Germany, $150,000,000. For acquisition of point air defense of United States airbases in the Federal Republic of Germany, $65,000,000. For acquisition of point air defense of United States airbases $15,000,000. Italy. (1294) |