To determine that question the court must ordinarily consider the facts peculiar to the business to which the restraint is applied; its condition before and after the restraint was imposed ; the nature of the restraint and its effect, actual or probable.... Communications Satellites: Hearings Before the Committee on Science and ...by United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Astronautics - 1961 - 908 pagesSnippet view - About this book
| United States. Courts - Corporation law - 1928 - 1244 pages
...which the restraint is applied ' its condition before and after the restraint was imposed : the natur of the restraint and Its effect, actual or probable. The history of ttf restraint, the evil believed to exist, the reason for adopting tliparticular remedy, the purpose... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - Courts - 1918 - 808 pages
...to the business to which the restraint is applied; its condition before and after the restraint was imposed; the nature of the restraint and its effect,...end sought to be attained, are all relevant facts. This is not because a good intention will save an otherwise objectionable regulation or the reverse;... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1918 - 810 pages
...to the business to which the restraint is applied; its condition before and after the restraint was imposed; the nature of the restraint and its effect,...actual or probable. The history of the restraint, the evii believed to exist, the reason for adopting the particular remedy, the purpose or end sought to... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1918 - 636 pages
...muet consider the facts peculiar to the business, its conditions before and after the restraint was imposed, the nature of the restraint, and its effect actual or probable. '2. MONOPOLIES <S=>17(1) — COMBINATION« PBOHIBITED— RULES OF BOABD OF TRADE. Such rule was a reasonable... | |
| Appellate courts - 1920 - 740 pages
...in Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, 246 US 231, 238, 38 Sup. Ct. 242. 244 (62 L. Ed. 683) : probable. The history of the restraint, the evil believed...end sought to be attained, are all relevant facts. This is not because a good intention will save an otherwise objectionable regulation or the reverse... | |
| United States. Federal Trade Commission - Grain trade - 1920 - 1074 pages
...to the business to which the restraint is applied; its condition before and after the restraint was imposed; the nature of the restraint, and its effect actual or probable * * *.'" The decision was based therefore upon the economic effects of the rule: * * Aa it applies to only a small... | |
| United States. Federal Trade Commission, United States - Business & Economics - 1922 - 212 pages
...to the business to which the restraint is applied ; its condition before and after the restraint was imposed ; the nature of the restraint, and its effect,...remedy, the purpose or end sought to be attained, and all relevant facts. This is not because a good intention will save an otherwise objectionable regulation... | |
| Herman Oliphant - Antitrust law - 1923 - 1114 pages
...to the business to which the restraint is applied; its condition before and after the restraint was imposed; the nature of the restraint and its effect,...end sought to be attained, are all relevant facts. This is not because a good intention will save an otherwise objectionable regulation or the reverse;... | |
| Gerard Carl Henderson - Administrative law - 1924 - 408 pages
...to the business to which the restraint is applied; its condition before and after the restraint was imposed ; the nature of the restraint and its effect,...end sought to be attained, are all relevant facts. This is not because a good intention will save an otherwise objectionable regulation or the reverse;... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1920 - 1020 pages
...Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, 246 US 231, 238, 38 Sup. Ct. 242, 244 (62 L. Ed. 683) : (259 F.) probable. The history of the restraint, the evil believed...end sought to be attained, are all relevant facts. This is not because a good intention will save an otherwise objectionable regulation or the reverse;... | |
| |