United States Court of Appeals for Administration |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 53
Page
... AN INTEREST AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 56821 PART 1 APRIL 1 AND 5 , 1938 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1938 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HENRY F. ASHURST , Arizona ,
... AN INTEREST AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 56821 PART 1 APRIL 1 AND 5 , 1938 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1938 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HENRY F. ASHURST , Arizona ,
Page 1
... Washington , D. C. The subcommittee met , pursuant to call , in the committee room , Capitol , at 10:30 a . m . , Senator M. M. Logan ( chairman ) presiding . Present : Senators Logan ( chairman ) , King , Norris , and Austin . Senator ...
... Washington , D. C. The subcommittee met , pursuant to call , in the committee room , Capitol , at 10:30 a . m . , Senator M. M. Logan ( chairman ) presiding . Present : Senators Logan ( chairman ) , King , Norris , and Austin . Senator ...
Page 5
... WASHINGTON , D. C. Senator LOGAN . Please state your name for the record . Mr. SEBREE . J. Emmett Sebree . Senator LOGAN . Where do you reside ? Mr. SEBREE . I reside at 1629 Columbia Road . Senator LOGAN . What is your position here ...
... WASHINGTON , D. C. Senator LOGAN . Please state your name for the record . Mr. SEBREE . J. Emmett Sebree . Senator LOGAN . Where do you reside ? Mr. SEBREE . I reside at 1629 Columbia Road . Senator LOGAN . What is your position here ...
Page 13
... no reason why members of this court should not go to Puerto Rico , and should not save the taxpayer the expense of coming to Washington . Senator AUSTIN . Neither do I. Here is a question UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR ADMINISTRATION ...
... no reason why members of this court should not go to Puerto Rico , and should not save the taxpayer the expense of coming to Washington . Senator AUSTIN . Neither do I. Here is a question UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR ADMINISTRATION ...
Page 14
... Washington . Senator AUSTIN . It is not comparable to the circuit courts of appeal , but is more comparable to the District Courts , is it not ? Mr. SEBREE . No ; I think not . The district court is wiped out as an appellate body ...
... Washington . Senator AUSTIN . It is not comparable to the circuit courts of appeal , but is more comparable to the District Courts , is it not ? Mr. SEBREE . No ; I think not . The district court is wiped out as an appellate body ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adminis administrative agencies administrative law administrative tribunal amended American Bar Association Attorney authority bill BLACHLY Board of Tax certiorari chairman Chief Justice circuit courts citizen committee on administrative common law conflict Congress constitutional controversies Court of Appeals Court of Claims Dean POUND decision or order Department determination district courts District of Columbia draft employees enforcement established evidence experience Federal Trade Commission filed findings of fact Government hearing independent agency instance interest Interstate Commerce Commission intra-departmental boards issued judges judicial review jurisdiction LASKI lawyers legislative litigation M. M. LOGAN matter MCGUIRE ment novo officers opinion parties petition practice procedure proceedings proposed reason record rule or regulation rules and regulations SEBREE Senator AUSTIN Senator BURKE Senator KING Senator LOGAN Senator NORRIS statute statutory Supreme Court Tax Appeals tion trative trial de novo United States Court Washington
Popular passages
Page 22 - the head of each department is authorized to prescribe regulations, not inconsistent with law, for the government of his department, the conduct of its officers and clerks, the distribution and performance of its business, and the custody, use, and preservation of the records, papers and property appertaining to it.
Page 35 - If either party shall apply to the court for leave to adduce additional evidence, and shall show to the satisfaction of the court that such additional evidence is material and that there were reasonable grounds for failure to adduce such evidence in the...
Page 146 - All cases for the enforcement, otherwise than by adjudication and collection of a forfeiture or penalty or by infliction of criminal punishment, of any order of the Interstate Commerce Commission other than for the payment of money.
Page 60 - States, shall, directly or indirectly, receive, or agree to receive, any compensation whatever for any services rendered or to be rendered to any person, either by himself or another in relation to any proceeding, contract, claim, controversy, charge, accusation, arrest, or other matter or thing in which the United States is a party or directly or indirectly interested, before any department, courtmartial, bureau, officer, or any civil, military, or naval commission whatever...
Page 32 - ... (d) The evidence so taken or admitted, duly certified and filed as aforesaid as a part of the record, shall be considered by the court as the evidence in the case. The proceedings in such cases in the circuit court of appeals shall be made a preferred cause and shall be expedited in every way.
Page 63 - Court orders a rehearing; or if the case is remanded by the circuit court of appeals to the Commission for a rehearing, and if (1) the time allowed for filing a petition for certiorari has expired, and no such petition has been duly filed, or (2) the petition for certiorari has been denied, or (3) the decision of the court has been affirmed by the Supreme Court, then the order of the Commission...
Page 40 - System, notwithstanding that such rule or regulation may, after such act or omission, be amended or rescinded or be determined by judicial or other authority to be invalid for any reason.
Page 26 - ... any documentary evidence of any corporation being investigated or proceeded against; and the commission shall have power to require by subpoena the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of all such documentary evidence relating to any matter under investigation.
Page 35 - The judgment and decree of the court affirming, modifying, or setting aside, in whole or in part, any such order of the Commission shall be final, subject to review by the Supreme Court of the United States upon certiorari or certification as provided in sections 239 and 240 of the Judicial Code, as amended (USC, title 28, sees. 346 and 347).
Page 32 - ... by the Supreme Court of the United States upon writ of certiorari or certification as provided in sections 239 and 240 of the Judicial Code, as amended (USC, title 28, sees. 346 and 347).