Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

INDEX-DIGEST

Page

ACCOUNTING METHODS

See also INCOME and INSURANCE COMPANIES.

Allocation of Income Among Corporations-Imputed Interest on Loans-Requisite Common Control.-Where petitioner corporations had equal ownership and control of corporation organized to construct and operate enclosed mall shopping center adjacent to their department stores, Commissioner could not utilize sec. 482 to impute interest income to petitioners on loans made to corporation, since (1) petitioners and corporation were not controlled by same interests, shareholders in each petitioner were not related, and each petitioner had only 50% interest in corporation, and (2) Commissioner's contention, that requirement was satisfied because petitioners had common interest whereby they should be considered as partnership, was unwarranted interpretation of statutory language, Congress clearly having in mind control of 2 or more businesses by same interest. Lake Erie & Pittsburgh Railway Co., in which Commissioner acquiesced for 20 years, reaffirmed. B. Forman Co‒‒‒‒‒‒

Bonus to Production Employees-Allocability of Part to Inventory as Labor Cost-Discretionary or Obligatory Distribution of Profits.-Commissioner properly allocated to petitioner corporation's inventory under sec. 446 portion of yearend bonus incentive compensation payments to production and production-oriented workers, accord with acceptable accounting practice being insufficient, since petitioner's practice of deducting entire payment in year made did not clearly reflect income, considering (1) bonus, based on wages and merit rating, was tied to production, and (2) consistent payment of bonus for 30 years rendered bonus obligatory rather than discretionary distribution of profits and limited board of directors' discretion as to amount. Lincoln Electric Co‒‒‒‒‒‒

Cash Method-Deduction-Additional State Income Taxes-Due But Unpaid.-Petitioner corporation, using cash method of accounting, was not entitled to deduction in 1962-63 for additional State income taxes due as result of decision herein, since petitioner did not show that additional taxes would become due, and even so, any additional taxes would not be paid in either 1962 or 1963. Motel Corp‒‒‒‒

Installment-Cookware Sales-Obligations Used for Loan Collateral as "Dispositions."-Petitioner corporation was entitled to report income from sale of cookware on installment method under sec. 453 in taxable years 1965-66, since, contrary to Commissioner's contention, under Town & Country Food Co. petitioner had not disposed of its installment obligations, which it assigned to bank as collateral for loan, considering facts, which established that transaction was in form and substance loan and not sale of collateral, including, inter alia, bank realized no income from installment obligations but only interest from actual amount owed by petitioner, petitioner handled installment collections and serviced customers, obligation to pay bank was not that of debtors under installment obligations but was that of petitioner and its guarantors, and restrictions imposed on petitioner's operations by its agreement with bank were indicative of loan. United Surgical Steel Co-‒‒‒‒.

Installment-Sale of Realty-Change of Election.-Petitioner, who elected to treat disposition of realty as installment sale on untimely filed 1965 return, but who incorrectly included amount of recognized gain to be reported in 1965, was bound by election upon audit by Com

913

926

1433

1215

1781

ACCOUNTING METHODS Continued

missioner who found installment method acceptable but computation
inaccurate, even though installment method turned out to have been
chosen to his disadvantage, under statute, regs., and case law. Ivan D.
Pomeroy--

Installment Method-Change in Law-Retroactive Applicability.—
Where petitioner sold his business Jan. 10, 1964, under contract pro-
viding for installment payments without interest which met sec. 453(b)
requirements for reporting gain on installment method, sec. 483
enacted Feb. 26, 1964, as applicable to installment payments made
after Dec. 31, 1963, for sales occurring after June 30, 1963, and pro-
viding that part of each installment payment would be treated as
interest if no interest was specified, retroactively applied to sale, with
result that payment in taxable year of sale exceeded 30% of sale
price as reduced by unstated interest and petitioner was not entitled
to use installment method, in view of express language of statute and
committee reports that new provision was to apply for purpose of "this
title," which included sec. 453(b). Raymond Robinson__.

Inventories-Method of Valuation-Prime-Cost vs. Full-Absorption
Method.-Court upheld Commissioner's use of full-absorption method
of valuing petitioner's inventories for 1962 and 1963, finding petitioner's
prime-cost method did not clearly reflect income, notwithstanding
consistent undisturbed use since 1928, less than 5% divergence in
reportable income under full-absorption method for 1953-67, or exist-
ence of errors such as improper inclusion of certain currently deductible
costs, since significance of consistent reporting is limited to use of
acceptable method, amounts in dispute were substantial although
small percentage of petitioner's income, and Commissioner is invested
with broad discretion in choosing method if taxpayer's method does
not clearly reflect income and his approach was not rendered arbitrary
by inclusion of erroneous items, which could be easily discerned and
adjusted in Rule 50 computation, as enumerated by Court. All-Steel
Equipment Inc---

ACCUMULATION OF SURPLUS

Avoidance of Tax on Shareholders-Business Purpose.-X was not mere
holding or investment company during 1961-64, since after 1953 trans-
fer of operating assets to subsidiary Y, it retained its realty, plant and
buildings, and insurance business, and after disposing of Y in 1961 was
deeply engaged in motel business through wholly owned subsidiary
formed to operate motel in joint venture with unrelated corporation;
nor did it accumulate earnings beyond reasonable business needs for
imposition of accumulated earnings tax, considering (1) most of earn-
ings had been converted into "other assets" unavailable for dividends
and (2) it needed at least $200,000 in working capital for motel venture,
which exceeded amount of liquid assets available for dividends. Mont-
gomery Co_____.

"Mere" Holding Company-Shopping Center Developer-Substantial
Business Activity.—On facts, petitioner corporation, engaged in busi-
ness of acquiring undeveloped real estate, arranging for construction
and leasing of improvements thereon, and attending to maintenance
and repair of certain portions of its rental properties, including shop-
ping center, apartment house, restaurant, and ground lease to service
station, was not "mere holding or investment company" under secs.
533(b) and 535 (c) (3) for purposes of accumulated earnings tax pro-
visions, considering case law, legislative history, and Commissioner's
regs. Dahlem Foundation, Inc..

ADDITIONS TO TAX

See also EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS.

Failure to File-Estimated Tax Returns.-Reasonable cause existed for
petitioner's failure to file estimated tax return for 1954 under applica-
ble provision of 1939 Code, since he had never previously had occasion
to file U.S. tax returns and his reliance on tax expertise of accountant
was both reasonable and prudent, but additions to tax for failure to file

Page

1716

772

1749

986

1566

« PreviousContinue »