FORM 27. STATEMENT OF DOCKET ENTRIES.

In the District Court of the United States for the ...

7. Judgment (with terms of sentence) or order

8. Notice of appeal filed

19....

Dated ...

Attest

Clerk.

NOTE.-Compare Form of Clerk's Statement of Docket Entries to be Forwarded under Rule 4, Form No. 3 (to accompany duplicate notice of appeal to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals), annexed to Rules of Criminal Procedure after Plea of Guilty, Verdict of Finding of Guilt, following 18 U. S. C. § 688.

INDEX

ACCOUNTING. See Labor, 10.

ADJUSTMENT BOARD. See Labor, 8.

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW. See also Constitutional Law, I, 5-6,
10; IV, 3; V, 5, 9; Jurisdiction, I, 7; III, 5; IV, 8-9; VI; Labor,
5, 7-8, 10; Price Control, 1-3; War, 8-12.

1. Authority of Agency. Scope. Determination finally of scope
of statutory power of administrative agency is judicial not adminis-
trative function. Social Security Board v. Nierotko, 358.

2. Determinations. Legal Basis Necessary. Administrative de-
terminations must have basis in law and be within authority of
agency. Id.

3. Determinations. Matters Dehors Record. Consideration of
matters dehors the record. U. S. v. Pierce Auto Lines, 515.

4. Regulations. Ambiguity. Effect. Effect of uncertainty or
ambiguity in regulations prescribed by Price Administrator. Kraus
& Bros. v. U. S., 614.

5. Judicial Review. Exhaustion of Administrative Remedy.
Exhaustion of administrative remedy as prerequisite to judicial
review. Macauley v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 540.

6. Judicial Review. Administrative Interpretations. Weight.
Interpretation of Act by administrator or agency charged with en-
forcement or administration, entitled to great weight. Boutell v.
Walling, 463.

7. Judicial Review. Scope. Labor Relations Act. Circuit
Court of Appeals without authority to eliminate broad cease-and-
desist order, where not objected to before Board and failure un-
excused. Labor Board v. Cheney Lumber Co., 385.

8. Judicial Review. Findings of Fact. Tax Court. Finality of
Tax Court's findings of fact when supported by evidence. Commis-
sioner v. Tower, 280; Lusthaus v. Commissioner, 293.

9. Judicial Review. Mistake of Law. Tax Court. Circuit
Court of Appeals authorized to reverse Tax Court decision based
on clear-cut mistake of law. Commissioner v. Wilcox, 404.

10. Judicial Review. Selective Training & Service Act. Scope
of judicial review of administrative action under Selective Training
and Service Act. Estep v. U. S., 114.

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW—Continued.

11. Procedure.

Overlapping Applications.

Interstate Com-
merce Commission. Procedure upon applications from two motor
carriers to operate between same points; grant of both applications.
U. S. v. Pierce Auto Lines, 515.

12. Rehearing. Discretionary. Rehearings are within discre-
tion of administrative agencies except for manifest abuse. Id.
ADULTERY. See Criminal Law, 1.

AFFIDAVIT. See War, 6.

AFFILIATION. See Transportation, 3.

AGREEMENTS. See Labor, 6, 8.

ALIMONY. See Constitutional Law, V, 6-8.

AMBIGUITY. See Administrative Law, 4; Criminal Law, 2.
ANTITRUST ACTS.

Violation. Treble Damages. Distribution of Films. Evidence
sustained verdict under Clayton Act for damages to theatre owner
resulting from discriminatory system of distributing films. Bige-
low v. RKO Radio Pictures, 251.

APPEAL. See Employers' Liability Act, 2; Jurisdiction, I, 4; II,
2-5; Procedure.

ARKANSAS. See Taxation, II, 3.

ARMY. See War, 1-12.

ARRAIGNMENT. See Constitutional Law, V, 2.

ART. See Postal Service.

ARTICLES OF WAR. See War, 3-7.

ASSIMILATIVE CRIMES ACT. See Criminal Law, 1.

ATROCITIES. See War, 3.

ATTORNEYS.

United States Attorneys. Duties. Duty of United States At-
torney to prosecute civil actions to which United States is party,
inapplicable to suit to enjoin violation of Emergency Price Control
Act. Case v. Bowles, 92.

AWARD. See Labor, 8, 10.
BACK PAY. See Labor, 10.

BAIL. See Procedure, 7.

BANKRUPTCY. See also Constitutional Law, I, 8.

1. Claims. Judgment. Res Judicata. Previously litigated is-
sue of fraud as res judicata in bankruptcy proceeding; effect of
state law. Heiser v. Woodruff, 726.

2. Claims. Priorities. Sureties. Surety on construction bond
may be subordinated to laborers and materialmen, though latter
failed to give notice required by state law. American Surety Co.
v. Sampsell, 269.

3. Reorganization Proceedings. Collateral Attack. Bankruptcy
Court. Effect on bankruptcy court of stay order of reorganization
court; collateral attack in bankruptcy proceeding on reorganiza-
tion proceedings unauthorized. Duggan v. Sansberry, 499.

4. Reorganization Proceedings. Claims. Procedure. Claim
against debtor in reorganization proceeding under § 77 by stock-
holder on behalf of corporation which subsequently petitions for
reorganization under § 77. Meyer v. Fleming, 161.

5. Reorganization Proceedings. Claims. Trustees. "Exclusive
jurisdiction" of reorganization court; claims enforced by same rule
as in ordinary bankruptcy; title and powers of trustee. Id.
BONDS. See Bankruptcy, 2.

CARNAL KNOWLEDGE. See Criminal Law, 1.

CARRIERS. See Administrative Law, 11; Labor, 2, 7-9; Transpor-
tation, 1-4.

CAUSE OF ACTION. See Jurisdiction, IV, 1-2, 10.

CENSORSHIP. See Postal Service.

CERTIORARI. See Jurisdiction, II, 2.

CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEALS. See Jurisdiction, III.

CIRCULATION. See Labor, 4.

CLAIMS. See Bankruptcy, 1-2, 4-5; Jurisdiction, V.

CLASSIFICATION ACT. See Postal Service.

CLAYTON ACT. See Antitrust Acts; Damages, 1-2; Evidence, 2.

CLOSED SHOP. See Jurisdiction, IV, 6.

COERCION. See Constitutional Law, V, 10.

COLLATERAL ATTACK. See Bankruptcy, 3; Constitutional Law,
I, 7-8.

COLORADO RIVER INDIAN RESERVATION. See Criminal
Law, 1.

FORM 22. WARRANT FOR ARREST OF WITNESS.

In the District Court of the United States for the .....
District of...

Division

You are hereby commanded to arrest John Doe and bring him forthwith before the District Court for the ...

trict of......

... in the city of

Dis

for the reason that he wilfully failed to appear after having been served with subpoena to appear at the trial of the case of United States v. Roe on the ...... day of

19.....

You are further commanded to detain him in your custody until he is discharged by the Court.