Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

This budget amendment is needed to finance the cost of the Food Stamp Program expansion which has resulted from:
(1) increased unemployment, (2) the increased share of State administrative costs, and (3) the increased cost of
printing food coupons and several other factors for which the recognized impact on the Food Stamp Program cannot
be measured. These additional impacts include: (1) the increased program awareness generated by the nationwide
publicity associated with the recent attempt to base purchase requirements on a proportionate share of a
participant's total income, (2) the increased cost of food, (3) higher income eligibility cut-offs, and
(4) increased utility costs which in turn increase allowable excess shelter cost deductions and, consequently,
increase the cost of bonus coupons for participants receiving such shelter cost deductions from net income.
Families and individuals with low income and/or unemployed turned to the Food Stamp Program for assistance in
meeting the rising cost of food. Recipients, including a population of newly unemployed, participated on a
continuous monthly basis rather than the former in-and-out pattern of program participation. The estimated
participation level of 15.8 million persons for the end of FY 1975 was exceeded in November of 1974 and reached
the record level of 19.5 million persons in May, 1975. The level of participation is expected to show a
continued increase during FY 1976 with some influence associated with seasonal variation in participation.
unforeseen record expansion of the Food Stamp Program necessitates revision of the estimated monthly average
participation from the originally budgeted 15.6 million persons to 20.7 million persons in FY 1976. The increase
in the cost of the Economy Food Plan, on which the household food stamp allotments are currently based, are
expected to be slightly lower than earlier estimates. The monthly cost of the Economy Food Plan for the average
four-person household will be increased from the current $154 to $162 from July 1 through December 31, 1975.
This differential is $2 less than the $10 increase originally estimated for the first six months of FY 1976.
The average monthly bonus per person will rise from the original estimate of $19.25 to $24.82 in FY 1976.
The estimated additional participation in the program will add more than $2.5 billion to the cost of bonus

The

coupons in FY 1976.

The recently proposed and rejected change in purchase requirements to a proportionate share of total income would have offset an estimated $650 million of this increase in the cost of bonus coupons. Enactment of P.L. 94-4 prevented this change in purchase requirements from being implemented. All available funds have been used to meet the program costs in FY 1975. Therefore, the $412 million of FY 1975 funds originally budgeted for use in FY 1976 are not available.

Public Law 93-347, enacted July 12, 1974, required Federal reimbursement of all State direct and indirect administrative costs on a 50-50 basis. Based on those budgets of estimated operating costs already submitted by State welfare agencies, it is apparent that the original amount of $146 million budgeted for FY 1976, which was based on very little program experience, will require an additional $154 million.

The increased level of program participation will also result in increased costs of printing the food coupons to be used by these participants, and will add an estimated $8.5 million to the budget estimate of $30 million for FY 1976. The increased caseload also places new demands on the Federal and State agencies to improve not only service to recipients but also program accountability, including satisfaction of the work registration requirements of the Food Stamp Program. Estimates supplied by the Manpower Administration of the Department of Labor indicate that the cost of employment service assistance associated with the work registration requirement will be at least $6 million in excess of the $22 million budgeted for this activity.

This revised budget may be on the high side because of the assumed rate of unemployment and the relationship of income growth to food price levels which are more accurately measured by other Federal agencies. These variables are very dynamic, and range estimates rather than fixed point estimates are more realistic measurements of their sizeable impact on the Food Stamp Program. A slight change from the estimates for any of these variables could have a very significant impact on the participation and cost levels of the Food Stamp Program.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Food and Nutrition Service

Justification for Budget Amendment, Fiscal Year 1976, for the "Food Stamp Program"

The following table summarizes fiscal year 1976 projected costs.

[blocks in formation]

A total of $6,590,095 is requested to cover the additional average monthly caseload of 20.7 million persons in 1976, the amendments contained in P.L. 93-347, and the cost of printing coupons and other factors for which the recognized impact on the program cannot be measured.

The high rate of unemployment has pushed participation in the Food Stamp Program to historically high levels.
Families and individuals with low income and/or unemployed turned to the Food Stamp Program for assistance in
meeting the rising cost of food. The estimated participation level of 15.8 million persons for the end of
FY 1975 was already exceeded by November 1974. By May, 1975, participation reached an historic high of 19.5

60-765 75 pt. 1 17

million persons. This surge in participation makes necessary revision of the estimate of average monthly
participation from 15.6 million originally estimated to 20.7 million persons per month in FY 1976. The
monthly cost of the Economy Food Plan for the average four-person household will be increased from the current
$154 to $162 from July 1 through December 31, 1975. This differential is $2 less than the increase originally
estimated for the first six months of FY 1976. The average monthly bonus per person will rise from the
original estimate of $19.25 to $24.82 in FY 1976. The increased participation will add over $2.5 billion to
the cost of bonus coupons in FY 1976. The recently proposed and rejected change in purchase requirements to a
proportionate share of total income would have offset an estimated $650 million of this increase in the cost of
bonus coupons. Enactment of P.L. 94-4 prevented this change in purchase requirements from being implemented.
All available funds have been used to meet the program costs in FY 1975. Therefore, the $412 million of

FY 1975 funds originally budgeted for use in FY 1976 are not available.

Public Law 93-347, enacted July 12, 1974, required Federal reimbursement of all State direct and indirect
administrative costs on a 50-50 basis. Based on those budgets of estimated operating costs already submitted
by State welfare agencies it is apparent that the original amount of $146 million budgeted for FY 1976, which
was based on very little program experience, will require an additional $154 million.

The increased level of program participation will also result in increased costs of printing the food coupons to be used by these participants, and will add an estimated $8.5 million to the budget estimate of $30 million for FY 1976. The increased caseload also places new demands on the Federal and State agencies to improve not only service to recipients but also program accountability, including satisfaction of the work registration requirements of the Food Stamp Program. Estimates supplied by the Manpower Administration of the Department of Labor indicate that the cost of employment service assistance associated with the work registration requirement will be at least $6 million in excess of the $22 million budgeted for this authority.

This revised budget may be on the high side because of the assumed rate of unemployment and the relationship of
income growth to food price levels which are more accurately measured by other Federal agencies. These variables
are very dynamic, and range estimates rather than fixed point estimates are more realistic measurements of
their sizeable impact on the Food Stamp Program. A slight change from the estimates for any of these variables
could have a very significant impact on the participation and cost levels of the Food Stamp Program.

[blocks in formation]
« PreviousContinue »