 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1919 - 800 pages
...A. 1916C, 797), where it is stated that the question is: "Was the employee at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation or in work so...related to it as to be practically a part of it?" The car upon which the plaintiff was employed went from one State into the other, and the plaintiff... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1919 - 806 pages
...in intrastate commerce. It was said that the test was: "Was the employee at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation, or in work so...related to it as to be practically a part of it?" And that question was answered in the negative, and the State board's award was affirmed. In New York... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1921 - 688 pages
...of employment in such commerce in the sense intended is, was the employee at the time of the injury engaged in -interstate transportation or in work so...related to it as to be practically a part of it?" (Shanks v. Delaisxire, Lackaivantta and Western Railroad Co. 239 US 556.) We are supported in our conclusion... | |
 | Law - 1916 - 506 pages
...of employment in such commerce in the sense intended is, Was the employe at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation, or in work so...related to it as to be practically a part of it?' Manifestly there was no such close or direct relation to interstate transportation in the taking of... | |
 | Law - 1917 - 510 pages
...of employment in such commerce in the sense intended is, Was the employe at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation or in work so...closely related to it as to be practically a part of it?"8 The work of some employes, however, has a broader connection with the entire operation of the... | |
 | Law - 1918 - 502 pages
...the business of interstate commerce as substantially to form a part or a necessary inciof the injury, engaged in interstate transportation or in work so closely related to it as to be practically part of it?"2 Most railroad tracks are used in both interstate and intrastate commerce, but when so... | |
 | Law - 1920 - 496 pages
...test being whether at the time of the injury the employe was engaged in interstate transportation or work so closely related to It as to be practically a part thereof. — Grand Trunk Western Ry. Co. v. Industrial Commission, 111., 1-5 N. E. 748. 21. ContractH... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1928 - 1130 pages
...of employment in such commerce in the sense intended is, was the employee at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation or in work so...closely related to it as to be practically a part of it" See, also, Chicago, Burlington & QRR v. Harrington, 241 US 177, 36 S. Ct. 517, 60 L. Ed. 941. In Pedersen... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1920 - 2100 pages
...could be opened to permit taking out freight for delivery to consignees, held to have been employed in interstate transportation, or In work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of It, and within employers' liability Act April 22. 190S, § 1 (Comp. St § 8657). 2. MASTER AND SERVANT... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1917 - 2042 pages
...transportation was too remote to permit the deduction that he was then engaged in interstate commerce, or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it. This case cites the Pedersen Case with approval, and supports, it seems to me, the rule therein established.... | |
| |
Was the employee at the time of the injury, engaged in interstate transportation or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it. 
