Supplemental Appropriations for 1982: Hearings Before the Subcommittees of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Ninety-seventh Congress, Second Session, Part 3U.S. Government Printing Office, 1982 - United States |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 67
Page 13
... less than $ 9 billion . It would seem , therefore , that in order to realize defense outlay reductions of the magnitude suggested over the next three years , major decisions must be made this year that will impact outlays not only in ...
... less than $ 9 billion . It would seem , therefore , that in order to realize defense outlay reductions of the magnitude suggested over the next three years , major decisions must be made this year that will impact outlays not only in ...
Page 18
... less if it had not been for inflation and the fact we have waited this many years to do it . We believe that $ 460 million is directly or indirectly affected by inflation and have solicited it . POMCUS SETS 5 AND 6 Mr. ADDABBO . How much 8.
... less if it had not been for inflation and the fact we have waited this many years to do it . We believe that $ 460 million is directly or indirectly affected by inflation and have solicited it . POMCUS SETS 5 AND 6 Mr. ADDABBO . How much 8.
Page 22
... less than $ 2 billion of the proposed reductions that had been identified for them in response to this compromise agreement . They then passed the bill with those higher totals . I think that reflects the fact that basically the people ...
... less than $ 2 billion of the proposed reductions that had been identified for them in response to this compromise agreement . They then passed the bill with those higher totals . I think that reflects the fact that basically the people ...
Page 29
... less cost effective buying of other programs . Has the budget been carefully reviewed as to what our priorities are ? We talk about a rapid deployment force . We started funding a rapid deployment force two years ago and there still is ...
... less cost effective buying of other programs . Has the budget been carefully reviewed as to what our priorities are ? We talk about a rapid deployment force . We started funding a rapid deployment force two years ago and there still is ...
Page 35
... less than the 4 per- cent estimated . In actuality we do not believe DoD uses all the tonnage in any of those categories with the possible exception of Ordnance & Other Military . The quantity of items produced in the three other catego ...
... less than the 4 per- cent estimated . In actuality we do not believe DoD uses all the tonnage in any of those categories with the possible exception of Ordnance & Other Military . The quantity of items produced in the three other catego ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
1982 pay increases 1982 President's Budget 1982 program supplemental ADDABBO additional Air Force aircraft airlift Answer Army Boeing BRISKIN Chairman Change in average CHAPPELL Colonel RASH Committee compensation original request compensation revised request COMPENSATION SUMMARY contract December 31 Department of Defense DICKS DUBE due to FY EDWARDS estimate Financing fiscal year 1982 fleet oiler foreign national separation funds FY 1982 President's FY 1982 program HEMTT included LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Logistics Vehicle System Marine Corps military personnel million MOSEMANN national separation pay NATO Navy Operation and Maintenance outlays outsize Pay Increase Costs pay increases $000 pay liability due pay raise percent procurement proposal Question rates real property reduction reenlistment Reimbursements reprogramming Secretary of Defense Secretary WEINBERGER separation pay liability ship specialty metals Subsistence supplemental request SUPPLEMENTAL REQUIREMENT surge tank total compensation $000 Total compensation original TOTAL Direct Obligations Total obligations Training U.S. Wage Board vehicles
Popular passages
Page 34 - That nothing herein shall preclude the procurement of specialty metals or chemical warfare protective clothing produced outside the United States or its possessions when such procurement is necessary to comply with agreements with foreign governments requiring the United States to purchase supplies from foreign sources for the purposes of offsetting sales made by the United States Government or United States firms under approved programs serving defense requirements or...
Page 222 - Mr. Chairman, that concludes my prepared statement I would be happy to answer any questions at this time.
Page 9 - OF THE AIR FORCE INTRODUCTION Mr. ADDABBO. The committee will come to order. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Alabama for the purposes of making a motion.
Page 195 - R. usher is Director of Personnel Plans, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, Manpower and Personnel, Headquarters US Air Force, Washington, DC He is responsible for developing Air Force policy for accession, entitlements, promotions, force utilization and human resources development.
Page 358 - President that he establish within the Executive Office of the President a point of authority to initiate action, and to direct and coordinate the efforts of the several responsible departments and agencies, necessary to solve the many problems relating to productivity, quality, manpower and critical materials that afflict the defense industrial base...
Page 316 - Yes, sir. [The statement follows :] STATEMENT OF MANUEL BRISKIN, ASSISTANT GENERAL COUNSEL (FISCAL MATTERS) OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS OF THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS IN CONNECTION WITH LANGUAGE CHANGES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1979 APPROPRIATIONS REQUESTED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Mr.
Page 9 - US NAVY, DIRECTOR OF BUDGET AND REPORTS, OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE NAVY REAR ADM.
Page 182 - Group and assure its responsiveness to the needs of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Office of the Secretary of Defense for operations analysis.
Page 34 - Stat. 531) is amended to read as follows : "(a) Beginning -with the quarter ending December 31, 1979, the Secretary of Defense shall submit...
Page 348 - A Congressional Committee Found that the Waiver Provisions Did Not Work.' A study by the Special Subcommittee on NATO Standardization, Interoperability and Readiness of the House Armed Services Coomittee concluded that the waiver provisions have not worked in the Interests of the United States. (See HASC-95-101 .) In its Findings and Conclusions, the Subcommittee report stated: • The "Culver-Nunn...