Report of the State Irrigation Commissioner to the Kansas State Board of Agriculture |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 77
Page
... July 1 , 1920 , to June 30 , 1922 Dup . 1923 D. of D. PRINTED BY KANSAS STATE PRINTING PLANT B. P. WALKER , STATE PRINTER TOPEKA 1922 REPORT OF THE те 824 K2 A3 WN STATE IRRIGATION. 9-5153.
... July 1 , 1920 , to June 30 , 1922 Dup . 1923 D. of D. PRINTED BY KANSAS STATE PRINTING PLANT B. P. WALKER , STATE PRINTER TOPEKA 1922 REPORT OF THE те 824 K2 A3 WN STATE IRRIGATION. 9-5153.
Page 1
... JULY 1 , 1920 , TO JUNE 30 , 1922 PRINTED BY KANSAS STATE PRINTING PLANT B. P. WALKER , STATE PRINTER TOPEKA 1922 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS RESSIVED APR 2 1923 DOCUMENTS DIVISION LIBRARIES 9-5153 REPORT ...
... JULY 1 , 1920 , TO JUNE 30 , 1922 PRINTED BY KANSAS STATE PRINTING PLANT B. P. WALKER , STATE PRINTER TOPEKA 1922 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS RESSIVED APR 2 1923 DOCUMENTS DIVISION LIBRARIES 9-5153 REPORT ...
Page 3
... July 1 , 1920 , to June 30 , 1922 , together with recommendations relating to certain state irrigation laws . Very respectfully , GEO . S. KNAPP , State Irrigation Commissioner . REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONER . CHAPTER I. GENERAL REVIEW OF ...
... July 1 , 1920 , to June 30 , 1922 , together with recommendations relating to certain state irrigation laws . Very respectfully , GEO . S. KNAPP , State Irrigation Commissioner . REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONER . CHAPTER I. GENERAL REVIEW OF ...
Page 13
... June . July . Aug. Sept. 9 10 11 29 30 12345678PORTSTER 2272285 31 1.49 1.10 1.50 1.02 1.51 .87 1.50 1.14 .87 5 . 1.50 1.14 .84 1.50 1.15 .85 1.50 1.18 1.09 1.51 1.19 1.08 1.21 1.07 1.18 1.06 1.18 1.07 1.15 1.00 1.18 .87 1.19 .90 1.47 ...
... June . July . Aug. Sept. 9 10 11 29 30 12345678PORTSTER 2272285 31 1.49 1.10 1.50 1.02 1.51 .87 1.50 1.14 .87 5 . 1.50 1.14 .84 1.50 1.15 .85 1.50 1.18 1.09 1.51 1.19 1.08 1.21 1.07 1.18 1.06 1.18 1.07 1.15 1.00 1.18 .87 1.19 .90 1.47 ...
Page 14
... June . July . Aug. Sept. 11 19 123456780-35 228 35 236 21 244 5 236 47 5 236 47 236 50 233 59 33 244 62 31 69 30 59 29 59 30 50 17 59 62 114 104 15 200 119 22 179 131 9 149 104 2 137 82 41 131 69 59 108 62 44 22 . 78 56 35 86 47 44 236 ...
... June . July . Aug. Sept. 11 19 123456780-35 228 35 236 21 244 5 236 47 5 236 47 236 50 233 59 33 244 62 31 69 30 59 29 59 30 50 17 59 62 114 104 15 200 119 22 179 131 9 149 104 2 137 82 41 131 69 59 108 62 44 22 . 78 56 35 86 47 44 236 ...
Common terms and phrases
acre-feet amount of water applying hourly gage Arkansas river Arkansas valley ascertained by applying August automatic graphic water-stage Board of Agriculture channel charge Colorado compact construction cost of pumping crops Daily discharge ascertained DAILY GAGE HEIGHT Discharge measurements diversion downstream engine farm farmer Finney county flood Gage Dis Garden City canal gauge heights to rating highway bridge hourly gage heights installed interest irri irrigation commissioner irrigation plant irrigation pumping plant Irrigation seasons July July 21 June 18 June 30 Kansas ditches Kearny county Knapp legislature mile operation Pawnee river Purgatoire river rating curve Records available register of deeds river at Garden river at Larned river at Syracuse Scott county second-feet Sept Stambaugh station storage stream tion Total township 24 south Unirrigated Verne Wallace county water for irrigation water right water supply water-stage recorder Weskan Wichita county yield
Popular passages
Page 19 - States and to the President of the United States, and the President of the United States is requested to give notice to the Governors of the signatory States of approval by the Congress of the United States.
Page 27 - Within sixty days after the notice is posted, the claimant must commence the excavation or construction of the works in which he intends to divert the water, and must prosecute the work diligently and uninterruptedly to completion, unless temporarily interrupted by snow or rain.
Page 39 - California, but the right to the use of running water flowing in a river or stream or down a canyon or ravine may be acquired by appropriation...
Page 19 - This compact shall become binding and obligatory when it shall have been approved by the Legislatures of each of the signatory States and by the Congress of the United States.
Page 25 - If congress consented, then the states were in this respect restored to their original inherent sovereignty; such consent being the sole limitation imposed by the constitution, when given, left the states as they were before . . . whereby their compacts became of binding force, and finally settled the boundary between them: operating with the same effect as a treaty between sovereign powers.
Page 19 - River System not covered by the terms of this compact; (b) over the meaning or performance of any of the terms of this compact; (c) as to the allocation of the burdens incident to the performance of any article of this compact or the delivery of waters as herein provided: (d) as to the construction or operation of works...
Page 25 - Glover, 119 US, 543; Ouachita Packet Co. v. Aiken, 121 US, 444; Indiana v. Kentucky, 136 US, 479; Virginia v. Tennessee, 148 US, 503; Wharton v. Wise, 153 US, 155; St.
Page 41 - A failure to comply with such rules deprives the claimants of the right to the use of the water as against a subsequent claimant who complies therewith.
Page 16 - Kansas as against all the defendants, without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff to institute new proceedings whenever it shall appear that through a material increase in the depletion of the waters of the Arkansas by Colorado, its corporations or citizens, the substantial interests of Kansas are being injured to the extent of destroying the equitable apportionment of benefits between the two states resulting from the flow of the river.
Page 19 - ... equity in the district court of the United States in the district in which any project or part thereof is situated for the purpose of revoking for violation of its terms any permit or license issued...