Cambridgeshire to the original returns of the Domesday jurors. In the English Historical Review, 1900, xv. 293-302, he criticises Maitland's definition of the Domesday manor (No. 1889). Round's most recent discussions of Domesday are to be found in his introductions to the Domesday portions of the Victoria county histories. Cf. The Breviates of Domesday, in Athenæum, Sept. 15, 1900, pp. 346-7; James Tait, Large Hides and Small Hides, in English Historical Review, 1902, xvii. 280-82.

In addition to the works mentioned below, the Victoria history of each county should also be consulted (cf. above, P. 409).

Bedfordshire.

See No. 1884b.

1892. AIRY, WILLIAM. A digest of the Domesday of Bedfordshire. Bedford, 1881.

Cambridgeshire.

1892a. Domesday book; or great survey of England of William the Conqueror, A.D. 1086: Cambridgeshire, ed. C. H. Evelyn White. [Extension of the text by H. G. Evelyn White, with transcript of an unpublished translation made by William Bawdwen in 1867.] East Anglian, 3rd series, vols. xi.-xii. passim. Norwich, etc., 1905-08; separately printed, 1910.

1893. *Inquisitio comitatus Cantabrigiensis; subjicitur Inquisitio Eliensis: ed. N E. S. A. Hamilton. Royal Soc. of Literature. London, 1876.

The Inquest of Cambridgeshire seems to be a copy of the original returns from which Domesday was compiled. This copy was made in the latter part of the 12th century, and it deals with the holders of lands in Cambridgeshire. Hamilton prints the texts of the Inquest and Domesday in parallel columns.

The Inquest of Ely (Hamilton, pp. 97–195) relates to the lands of Ely abbey in Cambridgeshire, Hertfordshire, Essex, Norfolk, Suffolk, and Huntingdonshire. Round believes that it is copied in part from the original returns of the Domesday jurors and in part from the second volume of the Exchequer Domesday. Hamilton's edition is better than Ellis's (No. 1884).

1894. WALKER, BRYAN. On the measurements and valuations of the Domesday of Cambridgeshire. Cambridge Antiq.

Soc., Communications, v. 93-129, and supplement. Cambridge,

1886 [1884].

Walker also has a paper on the Inquisitio Comitatus Cantabrigiensis, ibid., 1891 [1887], vi. 45-64.

Devonshire.

For various papers on the Devon Domesday by O. J. Reichel, see Devon. Assoc. for Advancement of Science, etc., Trans., 1894-1912, vols. xxvi.-xliv. passim (some of the papers are separately reprinted); and Victoria History of Devonshire (No. 839), i. 375-549.

1895. The Devonshire Domesday and geld inquest: extensions, translations, and indices [ed. J. B. Rowe and others]. Devon. Assoc. for Advancement of Science, etc. 2 vols. Plymouth, 1884-92.

Contains the Devon portions of both the Exchequer Domesday and the Exon Domesday.

1896. WHALE, T. W. Analysis of Exon. Domesday [part relating to Devon, with index]. Devon. Assoc. for Advancement of Science, etc., Trans., xxviii. 391-463, xxxiv. 289-324. Plymouth, 1896-1902.-Analysis of the Exon. Domesday in hundreds [Devon]. Ibid., xxxv. 662-712, xxxvi. 156-72. Plymouth, 1903-04.-History of the Exon Domesday. Ibid., xxxvii. 24683. Plymouth, 1905.

See also Whale's Principles of the Domesday' Survey and Feudal Aids,' ibid., 1900, xxxii. 521-51; and F. H. Baring, The Exeter Domesday, in English Historical Review, 1912, xxvii. 309-18.

Dorset.

1897. EYTON, R. W. A key to Domesday, exemplified by an analysis and digest of the Dorset survey. London, etc., 1878.

Valuable.

Durham.

1898. Boldon buke: a survey of the possessions of the see of Durham made by order of bishop Hugh Pudsey in 1183, with a translation, ed. William Greenwell. Surtees Soc. Durham, 1852.

-Translated, with critical introduction, by G. T. Lapsley, in Victoria History of Durham (No. 839), i. 259-341. London, 1905.

This survey enumerates various services and rents due to the bishop; it is called Boldon Book because the services of the village of Boldon are often referred to as a standard. There is another edition, by Ellis (No. 1884). Lapsley's text is based on a collation of the MSS. used by Ellis and Greenwell with the older Stowe MS., which they had not seen. Greenwell, in his appendix, prints extracts from the pipe rolls of Henry I., Richard I., and John, with Bishop Bek's great roll of receipts, A.D. 1309, and several charters.

Gloucestershire.

1899. ELLIS, A. S. Some account of the landholders of Gloucestershire named in Domesday. [Reprinted from the Transactions of the Bristol and Gloucestershire Archæological Society, iv. 86-198.] n.p., 1880.

1900. 1AYLOR, C. S. Analysis of the Domesday survey of Gloucestershire. Bristol and Glouc. Archæol. Soc. Bristol,

[1887]-89.

Valuable.

Hampshire.

1901. Liber Winton, ed. Henry Ellis, Domesday Book (No. 1884), iv. 529-62. Record Com. [London], 1816.

The Liber Winton, which is preserved in the library of the Society of Antiquaries of London, comprises two distinct records. The first is a survey of royal lands in Winchester, with the landgavel and geld paid in the time of Edward the Confessor and Henry I.; it was made between 1103 and 1115, by order of the king, from the verdicts of eighty-six burgesses. The second is an inquest of all lands in Winchester, made in 1148 by command of the bishop of Winchester. See Round's account of the Winchester survey, in Victoria History of Hampshire (No. 839), i. 527–37.

1902. LARKING, L. B. translations and appendix.

Kent.

The Domesday book of Kent, with
London, 1869.

Lancashire.

1902a. FARRER, WILLIAM. Domesday survey of Lancashire [analysis, etc.]. Lancash. and Chesh. Antiq. Soc., Trans., xvi 1-38, xviii. 88-113. Manchester, 1899-1901.-For his latest discussion of the subject, see Victoria History of Lancashire, 1906, i. 269-381.

Leicestershire.

1903. The Leicestershire survey (1124-29), ed. J. H. Round, Feudal England, 197-203. London, 1895.-Survey of Leicestershire [with a photographic copy. Translated by W. K. Boyd.] Leicestersh. Archit. and Archæol. Soc., Trans., viii. 179-83. Leicester, 1896.-Leicestershire survey [with map]. Translated by F. M. Stenton, in Victoria History of Leicestershire (No. 839), i. 339-54. London, 1907.

This survey deals with the land-owners of various hundreds, vill by vill, and was probably compiled in connection with the assessment of a geld.

Lincolnshire.

1904. The Lincolnshire survey, temp. Hen. I. [facsimile of the whole text, with a translation], ed. James Greenstreet. London, 1884. pp. 37.-Translated by R. E. C. Waters: A roll of the owners of land in the parts of Lindsey in Lincolnshire, compared with the Domesday survey of Lindsey. Reprinted from the Associated Architectural Societies' Reports and Papers, 1882, vol. xvi. pt. ii. Lincoln, [1883]. pp. 65.

This survey, made in 1115-18 for the assessment of a geld, gives the names of the tenants-in-chief of the crown, with the locality and extent of their estates, and in some cases the names of their under-tenants. Round, Feudal England (No. 1891), 181-95.

Middlesex.

See No. 1884b.

See

1904a. DAVIES, A. M. The Domesday hidation of Middlesex. Home Counties Magazine, iii. 232-8. London, 1901.

Norfolk.

1905. MUNFORD, GEORGE. An analysis of the Domesday book of the county of Norfolk. London, 1858.

Northamptonshire.

1906. The Northamptonshire geld roll, ed. Henry Ellis, Introduction to Domesday (No. 1884), i. 184-7. [London], 1833. This Anglo-Saxon document records a levy of Danegeld between 1066 and 1075. See Round, Feudal England (No. 1891), 147-56.

1907. The Northamptonshire survey, ed. J. H. Round, Feudal England, 215-24. London, 1895.-Translated by J. H. Round, in Victoria History of Northamptonshire (No. 839), i. 357-92. Westminster, 1902.

In his Feudal England Round prints only about a fifth of the survey, which is somewhat similar to that of Leicestershire (No. 1903). He believes that it was originally made under Henry I., and was subsequently corrected here and there, to bring the entries up to date, down to the days of Henry II.' See also his essay on the Hidation of Northamptonshire, in English Historical Review, 1900, xv. 78–86; and F. Baring's two papers, The Hidation of Northamptonshire in 1086, and The Pre-Domesday Hidation of Northamptonshire, ibid., 1902, xvii. 76-83, 470-79.

1908. M[OWAT], J. L. day. Oxford, etc., 1892.

Oxfordshire.

G. Notes on the Oxfordshire Domespp. 31, and map.

1909. EYTON, R. W.

Somerset.

Domesday studies: analysis and digest of the Somerset survey (according to the Exon. codex) and of the Somerset gheld inquest of A.D. 1084, as collated with Domesday. 2 vols. London, etc., 1880.

Valuable. There is a good Domesday map of Somerset, by Bishop Edmund Hobhouse, in the Proceedings of the Somersetshire Archæological and Natural History Society, 1890 [1889], vol. xxxv. pt. i. See also E. H. Bates, The Five-Hide-Unit in the Somerset Domesday, ibid., 1899, xlv. 51-107; and T. W. Whale, Analysis of Somerset Domesday, Bath, 1902, pp. 68 (appended is his Principles of Domesday, with an analysis in hundreds, pp. 48).

Staffordshire.

1910. EYTON, R. W. Domesday studies: analysis and digest of the Staffordshire survey. London, etc., 1881.

Valuable.

Suffolk.

1910a. Suffolk Domesday: the Latin text extended and translated. By John] H[ervey]. 2 vols. Bury St. Edmunds, 1888-91.