Apportionment of Representatives ...: Report. To Accompany H.R. 2983 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 93
Page 2
... number of Represent- atives are as follows : Alabama gains . California gains . Colorado gains . Florida gains . 1 ... total number of Representatives 433 without the loss of a Representative by any State . By fixing the ratio of ...
... number of Represent- atives are as follows : Alabama gains . California gains . Colorado gains . Florida gains . 1 ... total number of Representatives 433 without the loss of a Representative by any State . By fixing the ratio of ...
Page 3
... total population of the United States by the number of Representatives to be apportioned , thereby obtaining the ratio or number of people per Representative . It divides this ratio into the population of the several States , ranks the ...
... total population of the United States by the number of Representatives to be apportioned , thereby obtaining the ratio or number of people per Representative . It divides this ratio into the population of the several States , ranks the ...
Page 8
... number divided into the constitutional popula- tion of each State and one Representative assigned for each whole number and each major fraction in the series of quotients a total of 383 Representatives is reached . If the ratio be then ...
... number divided into the constitutional popula- tion of each State and one Representative assigned for each whole number and each major fraction in the series of quotients a total of 383 Representatives is reached . If the ratio be then ...
Page 9
... Total number of Representatives , 390 . Ratio for division , 234,522 . Total number of Representatives , 391 . Changes from Changes from Result of division . Final apportion- present apportionment . Result of division . ment . Final ...
... Total number of Representatives , 390 . Ratio for division , 234,522 . Total number of Representatives , 391 . Changes from Changes from Result of division . Final apportion- present apportionment . Result of division . ment . Final ...
Page 11
... Total number of Representatives , 894 . Ratio for division , 232,203 . Total number of Representatives , 395 . Changes from Changes from Result of division . Final apportion- present apportionment . Result of division . ment . Final ...
... Total number of Representatives , 894 . Ratio for division , 232,203 . Total number of Representatives , 395 . Changes from Changes from Result of division . Final apportion- present apportionment . Result of division . ment . Final ...
Common terms and phrases
11 Colorado 11 New Mexico 12 Idaho 12 Iowa 13 Minnesota 143 Connecticut 15 Michigan 15 Montana 18 Utah 21 Oklahoma 25 Indiana 809 Arizona according Alabama alternate ratios alternate ratios-Continued Arkansas ary ratios assigned for fractions ceding ap Census Changes from Changes Changes from present Changes from Result constitutional provision count-priority counted Delaware Exact quota Final apportion Georgia Hampshire Illinois inclusive Index of Rank Jersey Kentucky Louisiana least TABLE 4.-Apportionment Loss Maine major fractions major fractions-Continued Maryland ment method of 1850 method of alternate method of major Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota number of Representatives Ohio Oregon Pennsylvania population present apportionment Rank by Appor Ratio for division Ratio if fraction Receives a Representative representation Representative in virtue Representatives between 390 Representatives from 390 Result of division Resulting priority resulting ratios Rhode Island senta South Dakota Tennessee Texas total number unit Vermont Washington West Virginia Wisconsin York
Popular passages
Page 26 - New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah.
Page 89 - New Mexico New York North Carolina . North Dakota . . . Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania . . Rhode Island . South Carolina . South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington .... West Virginia . Wisconsin Wyoming UNITED STATES.
Page 76 - Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Of this number Massachusetts stated that they reviewed plans "only on request...
Page 59 - Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
Page 106 - New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming LLL KAT°.
Page 22 - New Mexico. . . . New York North Carolina . . North Dakota . . . Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Rhode...
Page 74 - Illinois . Indiana Iowa. . Kansas Kentucky Louisiana. ... Maine Maryland . . . Michigan.. . Mississippi . . . Missouri Montana. . . Nevada . . . New Hampshire New Jersey New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio...
Page 20 - New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oregon Rhode Island South Dakota „ . Texas .. Utah Vermont Virginia..
Page 1 - Delaware 1 Florida 4 Georgia 12 Idaho 2 Illinois 27 Indiana 13 Iowa 11 Kansas 8 Kentucky 11 Louisiana 8 Maine 4 Maryland 6 Massachusetts 16 Michigan 13 Minnesota 10 Mississippi 8 Missouri 16 Montana 2 Nebraska 6 Nevada 1 New Hampshire. ... 2 New Jersey 12 New...