Apportionment of Representatives ...: Report. To Accompany H.R. 2983 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 60
Page 44
... counted , that State receiving 38 Representatives , while the frac- tion of the small State is disregarded , that State receiving only one Representative . Yet the fraction in the case of the smaller State constitutes more than one ...
... counted , that State receiving 38 Representatives , while the frac- tion of the small State is disregarded , that State receiving only one Representative . Yet the fraction in the case of the smaller State constitutes more than one ...
Page 45
... counting or ignoring of the same fraction in case of a large State . The method of major fractions . — Another method of apportionnent which has been used on two or three occasions has been designated as the method of major fractions ...
... counting or ignoring of the same fraction in case of a large State . The method of major fractions . — Another method of apportionnent which has been used on two or three occasions has been designated as the method of major fractions ...
Page 50
... counted by the number of people per Representative in Bif B's fraction is disregarded— then A's fraction should be counted and B's disregarded . For brevity the two ratios for A may be called A's first ratio and A's second ratio and ...
... counted by the number of people per Representative in Bif B's fraction is disregarded— then A's fraction should be counted and B's disregarded . For brevity the two ratios for A may be called A's first ratio and A's second ratio and ...
Page 51
... counted as against any other State . The procedure , then , in making the apportionment would involve the following steps : 1. Compute the exact quotas to which the States are severally entitled on the basis of population and total ...
... counted as against any other State . The procedure , then , in making the apportionment would involve the following steps : 1. Compute the exact quotas to which the States are severally entitled on the basis of population and total ...
Page 52
... counting the fraction and from counting it . This product may be termed the index of priority , as it determines the order in which the States shall be considered in the assignment of fractions . In the table below the index is carried ...
... counting the fraction and from counting it . This product may be termed the index of priority , as it determines the order in which the States shall be considered in the assignment of fractions . In the table below the index is carried ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
11 Colorado 11 New Mexico 12 Idaho 12 Iowa 13 Minnesota 143 Connecticut 15 Michigan 15 Montana 18 Utah 21 Oklahoma 25 Indiana 809 Arizona according Alabama alternate ratios alternate ratios-Continued Arkansas ary ratios assigned for fractions ceding ap Census Changes from Changes Changes from present Changes from Result constitutional provision count-priority counted Delaware Exact quota Final apportion Georgia Hampshire Illinois inclusive Index of Rank Jersey Kentucky Louisiana least TABLE 4.-Apportionment Loss Maine major fractions major fractions-Continued Maryland ment method of 1850 method of alternate method of major Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada North Carolina North Dakota number of Representatives Ohio Oregon Pennsylvania population present apportionment Rank by Appor Ratio for division Ratio if fraction Receives a Representative representation Representative in virtue Representatives between 390 Representatives from 390 Result of division Resulting priority resulting ratios Rhode Island senta South Dakota Tennessee Texas total number unit Vermont Washington West Virginia Wisconsin York
Popular passages
Page 26 - New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah.
Page 89 - New Mexico New York North Carolina . North Dakota . . . Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania . . Rhode Island . South Carolina . South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington .... West Virginia . Wisconsin Wyoming UNITED STATES.
Page 76 - Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Of this number Massachusetts stated that they reviewed plans "only on request...
Page 59 - Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
Page 106 - New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming LLL KAT°.
Page 22 - New Mexico. . . . New York North Carolina . . North Dakota . . . Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Rhode...
Page 74 - Illinois . Indiana Iowa. . Kansas Kentucky Louisiana. ... Maine Maryland . . . Michigan.. . Mississippi . . . Missouri Montana. . . Nevada . . . New Hampshire New Jersey New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio...
Page 20 - New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oregon Rhode Island South Dakota „ . Texas .. Utah Vermont Virginia..
Page 1 - Delaware 1 Florida 4 Georgia 12 Idaho 2 Illinois 27 Indiana 13 Iowa 11 Kansas 8 Kentucky 11 Louisiana 8 Maine 4 Maryland 6 Massachusetts 16 Michigan 13 Minnesota 10 Mississippi 8 Missouri 16 Montana 2 Nebraska 6 Nevada 1 New Hampshire. ... 2 New Jersey 12 New...