(1) Sound Pressure Output Check A. Place the earphone coupler over the microphone of the sound level meter and place the earphone on the coupler. B. Set the audiometer's hearing threshold level (HTL) dial to 70 dB. C. Measure the sound pressure level of the tones at each test frequency from 500 Hz through 6000 Hz for each earphone. D. At each frequency the readout on the sound level meter should correspond to the levels in Table E-1 or Table E-2, as appropriate, for the type of earphone, in the column entitled "sound level meter reading." (2) Linearity Check A. With the earphone in place, set the frequency to 1000 Hz and the HTL dial on the audiometer to 70 dB. B. Measure the sound levels in the coupler at each 10-dB decrement from 70 dB to 10 dB, noting the sound level meter reading at each setting. C. For each 10-dB decrement on the audiometer the sound level meter should indicate a corresponding 10 dB decrease. D. This measurement may be made electrically with a voltmeter connected to the earphone terminals. (3) Tolerances When any of the measured sound levels deviate from the levels in Table E-1 or Table E-2 by ± 3 dB at any test frequency between 500 and 3000 Hz, 4 dB at 4000 Hz, or 5 dB at 6000 Hz, an exhaustive calibration is advised. An exhaustive calibration is required if the deviations are greater than 15 dB or greater at any test frequency. Table E-1-REFERENCE THRESHOLD LEVELS FOR TELEPHONICS-TDH-39 EARPHONES Reference threshold This Appendix Is Non-Mandatory In determining whether a standard threshold shift has occurred, allowance may be made for the contribution of aging to the change in hearing level by adjusting the most recent audiogram. If the employer chooses to adjust the audiogram, the employer shall follow the procedure described below. This procedure and the age correction tables were developed by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health in the criteria document entitled "Criteria for a Recommended Standard .. Occupational Exposure to Noise," ((HSM)11001). For each audiometric test frequency; (i) Determine from Tables F-1 or F-2 the age correction values for the employee by: (A) Finding the age at which the most recent audiogram was taken and recording the corresponding values of age corrections at 1000 Hz through 6000 Hz; (B) Finding the age at which the baseline audiogram was taken and recording the corresponding values of age corrections at 1000 Hz through 6000 Hz. (ii) Subtract the values found in step (i)(B) from the value found in step (i)(A). (iii) The differences calculated in step (ii) represented that portion of the change in hearing that may be due to aging. EXAMPLE: Employee is a 32-year-old male. The audiometric history for his right ear is shown in decibels below. Sound The audiogram at age 27 is considered the baseline since it shows the best hearing threshold levels. Asterisks have been used to identify the baseline and most recent audiogram. A threshold shift of 20 dB exists at 4000 Hz between the audiograms taken at ages 27 and 32. (The threshold shift is computed by subtracting the hearing threshold at age 27, which was 5, from the hearing threshold at age 32, which is 25). A retest audiogram has confirmed this shift. The contribution of aging to this change in hearing may be estimated in the following manner: Go to Table F-1 and find the age correction values (in dB) for 4000 Hz at age 27 and age 32. 5 7 10 6 7 11 7 7 7 7 39. 7 40. 7 The difference represents the amount of hearing loss that may be attributed to aging in the time period between the baseline audiogram and the most recent audiogram. In this example, the difference at 4000 Hz is 3 dB. This value is subtracted from the hearing level at 4000 Hz, which in the most recent audiogram is 25, yielding 22 after adjustment. Then the hearing threshold in the baseline audiogram at 4000 Hz (5) is subtracted from the adjusted annual audiogram hearing threshold at 4000 Hz (22). Thus the age-corrected threshold shift would be 17 dB (as opposed to a threshold shift of 20 dB without age correction). APPENDIX G TO § 1910.95-MONITORING NOISE LEVELS NON-MANDATORY INFORMATIONAL APPENDIX This appendix provides information to help employers comply with the noise monitoring obligations that are part of the hearing conservation amendment. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF NOISE MONITORING? This revised amendment requires that employees be placed in a hearing conservation program if they are exposed to average noise levels of 85 dB or greater during an 8 hour workday. In order to determine if exposures are at or above this level, it may be necessary to measure or monitor the actual noise levels in the workplace and to estimate the noise exposure or "dose" received by employees during the workday. WHEN IS IT NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT A NOISE MONITORING PROGRAM? It is not necessary for every employer to measure workplace noise. Noise monitoring or measuring must be conducted only when exposures are at or above 85 dB. Factors which suggest that noise exposures in the workplace may be at this level include employee complaints about the loudness of noise, indications that employees are losing their hearing, or noisy conditions which make normal conversation difficult. The employer should also consider any information available regarding noise emitted from specific machines. In addition, actual workplace noise measurements can suggest whether or not a monitoring program should be initiated. HOW IS NOISE MEASURED? Basically, there are two different instruments to measure noise exposures: the sound level meter and the dosimeter. A sound level meter is a device that measures the intensity of sound at a given moment. Since sound level meters provide a measure of sound intensity at only one point in time, it is generally necessary to take a number of measurements at different times during the day to estimate noise exposure over a workday. If noise levels fluctuate, the amount of time noise remains at each of the various measured levels must be determined. To estimate employee noise exposures with a sound level meter it is also generally necessary to take several measurements at different locations within the workplace. After appropriate sound level meter readings are obtained, people sometimes draw "maps" of the sound levels within different areas of the workplace. By using a sound level "map" and information on employee locations throughout the day, estimates of individual exposure levels can be developed. This measurement method is generally referred to as area noise monitoring. A dosimeter is like a sound level meter except that it stores sound level measurements and integrates these measurements over time, providing an average noise exposure reading for a given period of time, such as an 8-hour workday. With a dosimeter, a microphone is attached to the employee's clothing and the exposure measurement is simply read at the end of the desired time period. A reader may be used to read-out the dosimeter's measurements. Since the dosimeter is worn by the employee, it measures noise levels in those locations in which the employee travels. A sound level meter can also be positioned within the immediate vicinity of the exposed worker to obtain an individual exposure estimate. Such procedures are generally referred to as personal noise monitoring. Area monitoring can be used to estimate noise exposure when the noise levels are relatively constant and employees are not mobile. In workplaces where employees move about in different areas or where the noise intensity tends to fluctuate over time, noise exposure is generally more accurately estimated by the personal monitoring approach. In situations where personal monitoring is appropriate, proper positioning of the microphone is necessary to obtain accurate measurements. With a dosimeter, the microphone is generally located on the shoulder and remains in that position for the entire workday. With a sound level meter, the microphone is stationed near the employee's head, and the instrument is usually held by an individual who follows the employee as he or she moves about. Manufacturer's instructions, contained in dosimeter and sound level meter operating manuals, should be followed for calibration 50-109 0-91-8 and maintenance. To ensure accurate results, it is considered good professional practice to calibrate instruments before and after each use. HOW OFTEN IS IT NECESSARY TO MONITOR NOISE LEVELS? The amendment requires that when there are significant changes in machinery or production processes that may result in increased noise levels, remonitoring must be conducted to determine whether additional employees need to be included in the hearing conservation program. Many companies choose to remonitor periodically (once every year or two) to ensure that all exposed employees are included in their hearing conservation programs. WHERE CAN EQUIPMENT AND TECHNICAL ADVICE BE OBTAINED? Noise monitoring equipment may be either purchased or rented. Sound level meters cost about $500 to $1,000, while dosimeters range in price from about $750 to $1,500. Smaller companies may find it more economical to rent equipment rather than to purchase it. Names of equipment suppliers may be found in the telephone book (Yellow Pages) under headings such as: "Safety Equipment,” “Industrial Hygiene," or "Engineers-Acoustical." In addition to providing information on obtaining noise monitoring equipment, many companies and individuals included under such listings can provide professional advice on how to conduct a valid noise monitoring program. Some audiological testing firms and industrial hygiene firms also provide noise monitoring services. Universities with audiology, industrial hygiene, or acoustical engineering departments may also provide information or may be able to help employers meet their obligations under this amendment. Free, on-site assistance may be obtained from OSHA-supported state and private consultation organizations. These safety and health consultative entities generally give priority to the needs of small businesses. See the attached directory for a listing of organizations to contact for aid. OSHA ONSITE CONSULTATION PROJECT DIRECTORY State Office and address Contact Alabama. Alaska... American Samoa Arkansas California. Colorado Connecticut.. Delaware. District of Columbia.. Florida Georgia... Guam.. Alabama Consultation Program, P.O. Box 6005, (205) 348-7136, Mr. William Weems, Di- State of Alaska, Department of Labor, Occupa- Occupational Safety & Health Section, Colorado rector. (907) 276-5013, Mr. Stan Godsoe, Project Manager (Air Mail). (602) 255-5795, Mr. Thomas Ramaley, Manager. (501) 371-2992, Mr. George Smith, Project Director. (415) 557-2870, Mr. Emmett Jones, Chief. (303) 491-6151, Dr. Roy M. Buchan, Project Director. Division of Occupational Safety & Health, Con- (203) 566-4550, Mr. Leo Alix, Director. Occupational Safety & Health Division, District of 1 Hawaii. Idaho Illinois lowa. Indiana.. Kansas Kentucky.. Louisiana. Maryland State Massachusetts. Michigan (Health)... Michigan (Safety). Minnesota Mississippi. Missouri Montana Nebraska.. Nevada. New Hampshire New Jersey.. New Mexico.. New York. Bureau of Labor, 307 E. Seventh Street, Des (515) 281-3606, Mr. Allen J. Meier, Bureau of Safety, Education and Training, Indiana Commissioner. (317) 633-5845, Mr. Harold Mills, Director. Kansas Dept. of Human Resources, 401 Topeka (913) 296-4086, Mr. Jerry Abbott, Sec- Education and Training, Occupational Safety and Consultation Services, Division of Labor & Indus- Division of Industrial Safety, Massachusetts De- retary. (502) 564-6895, Mr. Larry Potter, Direc tor. (207) 289-3331, Mr. Lester Wood, Director. (301) 659-4210, Ms. Ileana O'Brien, Project Manager, 7(c)(1) Agreement. (617) 727-3567, Mr. Edward Noseworthy, Project Director. Special Programs Section, Division of Occupa- (517) 373-1410, Mr. Irving Davis, Chief. tional Health, Michigan Dept. of Public Health, 3500 N. Logan, Lansing, MI 48909. Safety Education & Training Division Bureau of (517) 322-1809, Mr. Alan Harvie, Chief. Training and Education Unit, Department of Labor Division of Occupational Safety and Health, Mis- Missouri Department of Labor and Industrial Rela- Montana Bureau of Safety & Health, Division of Nebraska Department of Labor, State House Sta- Department of Occupational Safety and Health, |