Reorganization Plan No. 5 of 1952: Hearings Before the Committee on Government Operations, United States Senate, Eighty-second Congress, Second Session, on the Reorganization of the District of Columbia. May 15, 20, 1952 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 27
Page 2
... performed by the District government . The present organization of the District government is seriously deficient in a number of respects . The first and most obvious defect is the extraordinary number of agencies among which the ...
... performed by the District government . The present organization of the District government is seriously deficient in a number of respects . The first and most obvious defect is the extraordinary number of agencies among which the ...
Page 5
... perform the functions delegated to him in accordance with this reorganization plan and shall receive compensation to be fixed in accordance with the classification laws , as now or hereafter amended , except that the compensation for ...
... perform the functions delegated to him in accordance with this reorganization plan and shall receive compensation to be fixed in accordance with the classification laws , as now or hereafter amended , except that the compensation for ...
Page 6
... performed by almost 100 separate District agencies . To accomplish this , plan No. 5 abolishes some 95 District boards ... perform- ance of any of its functions , including any function transferred to or otherwise vested in the Board of ...
... performed by almost 100 separate District agencies . To accomplish this , plan No. 5 abolishes some 95 District boards ... perform- ance of any of its functions , including any function transferred to or otherwise vested in the Board of ...
Page 13
... performed only by the Board itself as the head of the District government . Concerning the third of these limitations , it is important to note that it forbids the delegation of the appointing and removing power only with respect to the ...
... performed only by the Board itself as the head of the District government . Concerning the third of these limitations , it is important to note that it forbids the delegation of the appointing and removing power only with respect to the ...
Page 14
... performed by its staff and an Assistant Corporation Counsel in the presentation of evidence and the examination of witnesses at hearings be- fore the Commission . Because of this duplication , the office has been left vacant throughout ...
... performed by its staff and an Assistant Corporation Counsel in the presentation of evidence and the examination of witnesses at hearings be- fore the Commission . Because of this duplication , the office has been left vacant throughout ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abolished action administrative Advisory Council agencies or offices AMVETS appointed appropriation approved authority Bar Association Board of Commissioners Board of Tax Catholic War Veterans CHAIRMAN Citizens Associations city manager Columbia Industrial commission form Commissioner DONOHUE committee Congress consideration Corporation Counsel council-manager form Court created defects delegate detailed District agencies District government District of Columbia effect efficiency elected employees Engineer Commissioner favor Federation of Citizens fiscal form of government Fowler functions Griffenhagen home rule House Inspection Division interest legislation limitation manager form matters mayor-council MCCLELLAN ment missioners municipal government National Capital Park operations organization People's Counsel percent perform plan of reorganization present President Public Utilities Commission recommendations record referred reorganiza Reorganization Act reorganization plan representing resolution with respect responsibility ROBINSON Senator DwORSHAK separation of powers sioners specific statement submitted Tax Appeals tion transferred United vested Veterans Washington