Page images
PDF
EPUB
[graphic]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

Tom Connally and Hon. Lyndon B. Johnson, what are known as the blue slips, notifying them of the nomination. The blue slip, received from Senator Connally indicates that he favors the confirmation of Hon. Tom C. Clark to be Associate Justice of the Supreme Court; likewise, the blue slip returned by Senator Johnson. The blue slips will be inserted in the record and will become part of the files.

(The blue slips referred to are as follows:)

Hon. Tом CONNALLY,

United States Senate.

UNITED STATES SENATE, COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, August 3, 1949.

SIR: Will you kindly give me, for the use of the committee, your opinion and information concerning the nomination of Hon. Tom C. Clark, of Texas, to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, vice Frank Murphy, deceased.

Under a rule of the committee, unless a reply is received from you within a week from this date, it will be assumed that you have no objection to this nomination.

Respectfully,

REPLY

PAT MCCARRAN, Chairman.

Am supporting confirmation. General Clark is young, is able and has had notable legal career.

Hon. LYNDON B. JOHNSON,

United States Senate.

TOM CONNALLY.

UNITED STATES SENATE,
COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY,

August 3, 1949.

SIR: Will you kindly give me, for the use of the committee, your opinion and information concerning the nomination of Hon. Tom C. Clark, of Texas, to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, vice Frank Murphy, deceased.

Under a rule of the committee, unless a reply is received from you within a week from this date, it will be assumed that you have no objection to this nomination.

Respectfully,

PAT MCCARRAN, Chairman.

REPLY

To the Senate Committee on the Judiciary:

AUGUST 4, 1949.

I wish to endorse with enthusiasm and without reservation the nomination of the Honorable Tom C. Clark to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.

For a number of years I have known Mr. Clark and his family personally. The close friendship has afforded me an opportunity to understand and appreciate Mr. Clark's personal traits and characteristics, which, I believe, embrace the distinctions of intellectual integrity, consistency, rare courage, and complete honesty so essential to the character of a Supreme Court Justice. Some other men may equal Tom Clark in these components of character, but no other man within my acquaintance excels Tom Clark.

Mr. Clark's consistency, his ability to divorce the cause of justice from the ties of sentiment, his warm compassion for and understanding of the problems of our present-day society are indicative of a true judicial temperament. For most of his public-service career, Mr. Clark has been an advocate, not a judge, but his advocacy has been wise and reasonable, not bigoted and ruthless; this further commends him as a man qualified for the bench. Advocacy has been his

« PreviousContinue »