March 9, 1960. pp. 201-288
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1959 - Local transit - 288 pages
Committee Serial No. 11. Considers H.J. Res. 402, to grant congressional consent and approval for D.C., Virginia and Maryland to regulate mass transportation systems in D.C. and environs. Includes report "Transit Regulation for the Metropolitan Area of Washington, D.C." by Jerome M. Alper, Dec. 1955 (p. 43-101)
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
action agency ALPER amendment answer application approval authority bill Capital carrier certificate Chairman committee compact concerned CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Constitution counsel court D.C. Transit District of Columbia effect employees extent facilities fact fare Federal filed franchise further give going Government granted hearings House Joint Resolution improvement interests Interstate Commerce Commission issued Joint Resolution 402 jurisdiction laws legislation LIBONATI LIBRARY OF CONGRESS limited Maryland mass transit mass transportation matter means metropolitan area Metropolitan District mission necessary objectives officials operating person practice present problem proposed provisions question raised reasonable record referred regulation regulatory relating representatives require respect route rules securities signatories SPEAR specified stage statement strike substantial suspended temporary thereof thing tion traffic Transit Commission transportation Tuck United unless Utilities Virginia Washington
Page 203 - The Commission may also, after hearing on a complaint, establish through routes and joint rates as the maximum to be charged and prescribe the division of such rates as hereinbefore provided, and the terms and conditions under which such through routes shall be operated...
Page 204 - Board is empowered to require annual, monthly, periodical, and special reports from any air carrier; to prescribe the manner and form in which such reports shall be made...
Page 207 - Circuit Court of Appeals of the United States, within any circuit wherein such person resides or has his principal place of business, or in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, by filing in such court, within sixty days after the entry of such order, a written petition praying that the order of the Commission be modified or set aside in whole or in part.
Page 207 - If either party shall apply to the court for leave to adduce additional evidence, and shall show to the satisfaction of the court that such additional evidence is material and that there were reasonable grounds for the failure to adduce such evidence in the...
Page 207 - ... (g) The commencement of proceedings under subsection (e) or (f) of this section shall not, unless specifically ordered by the court, operate as a stay of the Board's order.
Page 200 - ... and in case of such joint rates, fares, and charges, to establish just, reasonable, and equitable divisions thereof as between the carriers participating therein which shall not unduly prefer or prejudice any of such participating carriers.
Page 208 - The Commission may employ such attorneys as it finds necessary for proper legal aid and service of the Commission or its members in the conduct of their work, or for proper representation of the public interest in investigations made by it, or cases or proceedings pending before it, whether at the Commission's own instance or upon complaint, or to appear for or represent the Commission in any case in court; and the expenses of such employment shall be paid out of the appropriation for the Commission.
Page 255 - Plan developed by the National Capital Planning Commission and the National Capital Regional Planning Council. The plan projected a total regional population of five million by the year 2000.