Page images
PDF
EPUB

SECTION NV - MATERIALS, PURCHASED PARTS AND SUBCONTRACTS

1. PARTS/MATERIALS/SUBCONTRACTS WITH LONGEST LEAD TIME OR CRUCIAL ITEMS

DESCRIPTION
(a)

SOURCE
(b)

VERFED DELIVERY DATE TO MEET PROD. (c)

2. DESCRIBE THE MATERIAL CONTROL SYSTEM, INDICATING WHETHER IT IS CURRENTLY OPERATIONAL, AND EVALUATE ITS ABILITY TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THE PROPOSED ACQUISITION.

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

(Government and civilian concurrent production schedule using same equipment and/or personnel as offered item) ITEMS) (Include Government Contract No., if MONTHLY SCHEDULE OF CONCURRENT DELIVERIES (Quantity) applicable. Identify unsatisfactory performance with asterisk (*)) 8th 9th

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

5th

6th

חור

10th

BAL

BEING PRODUCED

PENARD

AWA

SECTION IX ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT DATA

Provide the following information in SECTION I NARRATIVE:

1. Describe the relationship between management, production, and inspection. Attach an organizational chart, if available.

2. Describe the prospective contractor's production control system. State whether or not it is operational

3. Evaluate the prospective contractor's production control system in terms of (a) historical effectiveness, (b) the proposed contract, and (c) total production during performance of the proposed contract.

4. Comment on or evaluate other areas unique to this survey (include all special requests by the contracting office and any other information pertinent to the proposed contract or item classification).

[55 FR 25556, June 21, 1990]

STANDARD FORM 1405 REV. 9-08 PAGE

[ocr errors][merged small]

53.301-1406 Preaward Survey of Prospective Contractor-Quality Assurance.

SERIAL NO. For surveying activity use)

PREAWARD SURVEY OF PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTOR
QUALITY ASSURANCE

PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTOR

FORM APPROVED ONE NO. 9000-0011

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 24 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the FAR Secretariat (VRS), Office of Federal Acquisition and Regulatory Policy, GSA, Washington, D.C. 20405; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (9000-0011), Washington, D.C. 20503.

SECTION 1 - RECOMMENDATION

1. RECOMMEND:

AWARD

NO AWARD (Provide full substantiation for recommendation in 4. NARRATIVE)

2. F PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTOR RECEIVES AWARD, A POST AWARD CONFERENCE, IS RECOMMENDED.

3. AN ON-SITE SURVEY WAS PERFORMED.

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

SECTION - COMPANY AND SOLICITATION DATA

1. QUALITY ASSURANCE ORGANIZATION Describe briefly and attach organization chart.)

2. QUALITY ASSURANCE OFFICIALS CONTACTED Games, titles, and years of quality assurance experience)

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

2. Records available indicate that the prospective contractor has a satisfactory quality performance record during the past twelve (12) months for similar items.

3. Used or reconditioned material and former Government surplus material will be furnished by the prospective contractor. (If Yes, explain in Section I NARRATIVE

4. Prospective contractor will require unusual assistance from the Government.

5. Did prospective contractor fulfill commitments to correct deficiencies, as proposed on previous surveys, when awarded that contract?

[blocks in formation]

The following are available and adequate. (If not applicable, show "NA" in "Yes" column)

8. Inspection and test equipment, gauges, and instruments for first article and production (including solicitation specified equipment).

9. Calibration/metrology program.

10. Written procedures and instructions for inspections, tests, process controls, and other requirements; conformance thereto; in conjunction with other planning control functions.

11. Control of specifications, drawings, changes and modifications, work/process instructions.

12. Quality assurance/control organizational structure.

13. System for determining inspection, test, and measurement requirements.

14. Controls for selecting qualified suppliers and assuring the quality of purchased materials.

15. Material controk identification, segregation, maintenance, preservation, and correction of defects.

16. Government furnished property controls.

17. in-process inspection controls.

18. System for timely identification and correction of deficiencies to prevent recurrence. 19. Preservation, packaging, packing, marking controls.

20. Quality control records (such as: inspection, test, corrective actions, calibration, etc) 21. Controls for investigation of customer complaints and correction of deficiencies. 22. Reliability and/or maintainability program.

23. Computer software (deliverable and/or non-deliverable) quality assurance program.

[55 FR 25560, June 21, 1990]

STANDARD FORM 1408 REV. - BACK

53.301-1407 Preaward Survey of Prospective Contractor-Financial Capability.

SERIAL NO. For surveying activity use)

PREAWARD SURVEY OF PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTOR

PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTOR

FINANCIAL CAPABILITY

FORM APPROVED OMB NO. 9000-0011

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 24 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the FAR Secretariat (VRS), Office of Federal Acquisition and Regulatory Policy, GSA, Washington, D.C. 20405; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (9000-0011), Washington, D.C. 20503.

[blocks in formation]

3. NARRATIVE (Cite those sections of the report which substantiate the recommendation. Give any other backup information in this space or on an additional sheet, if necessary)

[blocks in formation]
« PreviousContinue »