| Carriers - 1973 - 142 pages
...defined as such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. It must be enough to justify, if the trial were to...sought to be drawn from it is one of fact for the jury. This is something less than the weight of the evidence, and the possibility of drawing two inconsistent... | |
| United States. Customs Court - Customs administration - 1975 - 376 pages
...is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion, and it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to...sought to be drawn from it is one of fact for the jury. National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co., 306 US 292. "Under this test... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Labor - Labor and laboring classes - 1939 - 1332 pages
..."inclusion." Cotmolulfiteit Edinon Co. of JVeio York v. National Labor Relations "oord, supra, and it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to a jury, a refusal to direct a verdict when (he conclusion sought to be drawn from it is «» of fact for the Jury. (See K. <£ 0. Railroad Co.... | |
| United States. U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Education and Labor - 1940 - 1662 pages
...Co. of Hew York v. National Labor Relations Board, supra (59 S. Ct. (206) 217 (83 L. Ed. — ) ), and it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to...to be drawn from it is one of fact for the Jury." The pronouncement of the test to be applied by a reviewing court to ascertain •whether a finding... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Labor - 1940 - 1566 pages
...a fowlusion," Connolidnted- Edison Co. of Ncw> York v. National IMOOI- Relations Board, supra, and It must be enough to justify, if the trial were to...when the conclusion sought to be drawn from it is «e of fact for the jury. (See B. d 0. Railroad Co. v. Qroegaer (2(56 US 521, 84): Gunning v. Coolcy... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means - 1943 - 1002 pages
...support a conclusion' (Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra, p. 229), and it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to...to be drawn from it is one of fact for the jury." While the Court says "substantial evidence is something more than a scintilla and must do more than... | |
| United States. National Labor Relations Board - Labor laws and legislation - 1968 - 1564 pages
...conclusion." Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 US 197, 229, 59 S.Ct. 206, 216, 83 L.Ed. 126, and "it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to...to be drawn from it is one of fact for the jury." NLRB v. Columbian Enameling and Stomping Co., 306 US 292, 300, 59 S.Ct. 501, 505, 83 L.Ed. 660. In... | |
| United States. Federal Trade Commission - Trade regulation - 1944 - 826 pages
...support a conclusion' (Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra, page 229), and it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to...to be drawn 'from it is one of fact for the jury." [Citing cases.] We have then to consider whether the Commission's findings in the instant case, so... | |
| |