Page images
PDF
EPUB

to the interested parties, file with the Superintendent a written petition for rehearing. Such a petition must be under oath and must state specifically and concisely the grounds upon which it is based. If the petition is based upon newly-discovered evidence, it shall be accompanied by affidavits of witnesses stating fully what the new testimony is to be. It shall also state justifiable reasons for the failure to discover and present that evidence, tendered as new, at the hearings held prior to the issuance of the decision. The Superintendent, upon receiving a petition for rehearing, shall promptly forward it to the administrative law judge. The Superintendent shall not pay claims or distribute the estate while such petition is pending unless otherwise directed by the administrative law judge.

(b) If proper grounds are not shown, or if the petition is not filed within the time prescribed in paragraph (a) of this section, the administrative law judge shall issue an order denying the petition and shall set forth therein his reasons therefor. He shall furnish copies of such order to the petitioner, the Superintendent, and the parties in interest.

(c) If the petition appears to show merit, the administrative law judge shall cause copies of the petition and supporting papers to be served on those persons whose interest in the estate might be adversely affected by the granting of the petition. The administrative law judge shall allow all persons served a reasonable, specified time in which to submit answers or legal briefs in opposition to the petition. The administrative law judge shall then reconsider, with or without hearing as he may determine, the issues raised in the petition; he may adhere to the former decision, modify or vacate it, or make such further order as is warranted.

(d) Upon entry of a final order the administrative law judge shall lodge the complete record relating to the petition with the title plant designated under § 4.236(b), and furnish a duplicate record thereof to the Superintendent.

(e) Successive petitions for rehearing are not permitted, and, except for the

issuance of necessary orders nunc pro tunc to correct clerical errors in the decision, the administrative law judge's jurisdiction shall have terminated upon the issuance of a decision finally disposing of a petition for rehearing. Nothing herein shall be construed as a bar to the remand of a case by the Board for further hearing or rehearing after appeal.

(f) At the time the final decision is entered following the filing of a petition for rehearing, the administrative law judge shall direct a notice of such action with a copy of the decision to the Superintendent and to the parties in interest and shall mail the same by regular mail to the said parties at their addresses of record.

(g) No distribution shall be made under such order for a period of 60 days following the mailing of a notice of decision pending the filing of a notice of appeal by an aggrieved party as herein provided.

[36 FR 7186, Apr. 15, 1971, as amended at 36 FR 24813, Dec. 23, 1971]

§ 4.242 Reopening.

(a) Within a period of 3 years from the date of a final decision issued by an administrative law judge or by the Board but not thereafter except as provided in §§ 4.203 and 4.206, any person claiming an interest in the estate who had no actual notice of the original proceedings and who was not on the reservation or otherwise in the vicinity at any time while the public notices of the hearing were posted may file a petition in writing for reopening of the case. Any such petition shall be addressed to the administrative law judge and filed at his headquarters. A copy of such petition shall be furnished also by the petitioner to the Superintendent. All grounds for the reopening must be set forth fully. If based on alleged errors of fact, all such allegations shall be under oath and supported by affidavits.

(b) If the administrative law judge finds that proper grounds are not shown, he shall issue an order denying the petition and setting forth the reasons for such denial. Copies of the administrative law judge's decision shall be mailed to the petitioner, the Super

intendent, and to those persons who share in the estate.

(c) If the petition appears to show merit, the administrative law judge shall cause copies of the petition and all papers filed by the petitioner to be served on those persons whose interest in the estate might be adversely affected by the granting of the petition. Such persons may resist such petition by filing answers, cross-petitions, or briefs. Such filings shall be made within such reasonable time periods as the administrative law judge specifies. The administrative law judge shall then reconsider, with or without hearing as he may determine, prior actions taken in the case and may either adhere to, modify, or vacate the original decision. Copies of the administrative law judge's decision shall be mailed to the petitioner, to all persons who received copies of the petition, and to the Superintendent.

(d) To prevent manifest error an administrative law judge may reopen a case within a period of 3 years from the date of the final decision, after due notice on his own motion, or on petition of an officer of the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Copies of the administrative law judge's decision shall be mailed to all parties in interest and to the Superintendent.

(e) The administrative law judge may suspend distribution of the estate or the income therefrom during the pendency of reopening proceedings by order directed to the Superintendent.

(f) The administrative law judge shall lodge the record made in disposing of a reopening petition with the title plant designated under § 4.236(b) and shall furnish a duplicate record thereof to the Superintendent.

(g) No distribution shall be made under a decision issued pursuant to paragraph (b), (c), or (d) of this section for a period of 60 days following the mailing of the copy of the decision as therein provided, pending the filing of a notice of appeal by an aggrieved party.

(h) If a petition for reopening is filed more than 3 years after the entry of a final decision in a probate, it shall be allowed only upon a showing that a manifest injustice will occur; that a reasonable possibility exists for correc

tion of the error; that the petitioner had no actual notice of the original proceedings; and that petitioner was not on the reservation or otherwise in the vicinity at any time while the public notices were posted. A denial of such petition may be made by the administrative law judge on the basis of the petition and available Bureau records. No such petition shall be granted, however, unless the administrative law judge has caused copies of the petition and all other papers filed by the petitioner to be served on those persons whose interest in the estate might be adversely affected by the granting of the petition, and after allowing such persons an opportunity to resist such petition by filing answers, cross petitions or briefs as provided in (c) of this rule.

[36 FR 7186, Apr. 15, 1971, as amended at 36 FR 24813, Dec. 23, 1971; 43 FR 5514, Feb. 9, 1978]

CLAIMS

§ 4.250 Filing and proof of creditor claims; limitations.

(a) All claims against the estate of a deceased Indian held by creditors chargeable with notice of the hearing under § 4.211(c) shall be filed with either the Superintendent or the administrative law judge prior to the conclusion of the first hearing, and if they are not so filed, they shall be forever barred.

(b) The claims of non-Indians shall be filed in triplicate, itemized in detail as to dates and amounts of charges for purchases or services and dates and amounts of payments on account. Such claims shall show the names and addresses of all parties in addition to the decedent from whom payment might be sought. Each claim shall be supplemented by an affidavit, in triplicate, of the claimant or someone in his behalf that the amount claimed is justly due from the decedent, that no payments have been made on the account which are not credited thereon as shown by the itemized statement, and that there are no offsets to the knowledge of the claimant.

(c) Claims of individual Indians against the estate of a deceased Indian

may be presented in the manner set forth in paragraph (b) of this section or by oral evidence at the hearing where the claimant shall be subject to examination under oath relative thereto.

(d) Claims for care may not be allowed except upon clear and convincing evidence that the care was given on a promise of compensation and that compensation was expected.

(e) A claim, whether that of an Indian or non-Indian, based on a written or oral contract, express or implied, where the claim for relief has existed for such a period as to be barred by the State laws at date of decedent's death, cannot be allowed.

(f) Claims sounding in tort not reduced to judgment in a court of competent jurisdiction, and other unliquidated claims not properly within the jurisdiction of a probate forum, may be barred from consideration by an administrative law judge's interim order.

(g) Claims of a State or any of its political subdivisions on account of social security or old-age assistance payments shall not be allowed.

[36 FR 7186, Apr. 15, 1971, as amended at 36 FR 24813, Dec. 23, 1971]

§ 4.251 Priority of claims.

After allowance of the costs of administration, including the probate fee, claims shall be allowed:

(a) Priority in payment shall be allowed in the following order except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section:

(1) Claims for expenses for last illness not in excess of $500, and for funeral expenses not in excess of $500;

(2) Claims of unsecured indebtedness to the United States or any of its agencies;

(3) Claims of unsecured indebtedness to a Tribe or to any of its subsidiary organizations;

(4) Claims of general creditors, including that portion of expenses of last illness not previously authorized in excess of $500 and that portion of funeral charges not previously authorized in excess of $500.

(b) The preference of the probate fee and of other claims may be deferred, in the discretion of the administrative law judge, in making adjust

ments or compromises beneficial to the estate.

(c) No claims of general creditors shall be allowed if the value of the estate is $2,500 or less and the decedent is survived by a spouse or by one or more minor children. In no event shall claims be allowed in an aggregate amount which is in excess of the valuation of the estate; the general creditors' claims may be prorated or disallowed entirely, and the preferred claims may be prorated subject to the limitations contained in paragraph (d) of this section.

(d) If the income of the estate is not sufficient to permit the payment of allowed claims of general creditors within 3 years from the date of allowance; or to permit payment of the allowed claims of preferred creditors, except the United States, within 7 years from the date of allowance, then the unpaid balance of such claims shall not be enforceable against the estate or any of its assets.

(e) In the event that it is determined that a part or portion of the estate is to lose its trust character pursuant to findings made under § 4.206, then the administrative law judge may in his discretion prorate all claims and reduce the allowance thereof on a ratio comparable with that existing between the total value of the estate and the value of that portion which is to lose its trust character.

§ 4.252 Property subject to claims.

Claims are payable from income from the lands remaining in trust. Further, except as prohibited by law, all trust moneys of the deceased on hand or accrued at time of death, including bonds, unpaid judgments, and accounts receivable, may be used for the payment of claims, whether the right, title, or interest that is taken by an heir, devisee, or legatee remains in or passes out of trust.

WILLS

§ 4.260 Making; review as to form; revocation.

(a) An Indian of the age of 21 years or over and of testamentary capacity, who has any right, title, or interest in trust property, may dispose of such

property by a will executed in writing and attested by two disinterested adult witnesses.

(b) When an Indian executes a will and submits the same to the Superintendent of the Agency, the Superintendent shall forward it to the Office of the Solicitor for examination as to adequacy of form, and for submission by the Office of the Solicitor to the Superintendent of any appropriate comments. The will or codicil or any replacement or copy thereof may be retained by the Superintendent at the request of the testator or testatrix for safekeeping. A will shall be held in absolute confidence, and no person other than the testator shall admit its existence or divulge its contents prior to the death of the testator.

(c) The testator may, at any time during his lifetime, revoke his will by a subsequent will or other writing executed with the same formalities as are required in the case of the execution of a will, or by physically destroying the will with the intention of revoking it. No will that is subject to the regulations of this subpart shall be deemed to be revoked by operation of the law of any State.

[36 FR 7186, Apr. 15, 1971, as amended at 36 FR 21284, Nov. 5, 1971; 36 FR 24813, Dec. 23, 1971]

§ 4.261 Anti-lapse provisions.

When an Indian testator devises or bequeaths trust property to any of his lineal descendants, mother or father, brothers or sisters, either of the whole or half-blood or their issue, and the devisee or legatee dies before the testator leaving lineal descendants, such descendants shall take the right, title, or interest so given by the will per stirpes. Relationship by adoption shall be equivalent to relationship by blood.

§ 4.262 Felonious taking of testator's life. No person who has been finally convicted of feloniously causing the death or taking the life of, or procuring another person to take the life of, the testator, shall take directly or indirectly any devise or legacy under deceased's will. All right, title, and interest existing in such a situation shall vest and be determined as if the

person convicted never existed, notwithstanding § 4.261.

CUSTODY AND DISTRIBUTION OF ESTATES

§ 4.270 Custody and control of trust estates.

assume

The Superintendent may custody or control of all trust personal property of a deceased Indian and he may take such action, including sale thereof, as in his judgment is necessary for the benefit of the estate, the heirs, legatees, and devisees, pending entry of the decision provided for in § 4.240, § 4.241, or § 4.296 or decisions in the settlement of the estate as provided for in § 4.271. All expenses, including expenses of roundup, branding, care, and feeding of livestock, shall be a proper charge against the estate and may be paid by the Superintendent from those funds of the deceased that are under his control, or from the proceeds of a sale of the property or a part thereof.

§ 4.271 Summary distribution.

When an Indian dies intestate leaving only trust personal property or cash of a value of less than $1,000, the Superintendent shall assemble the apparent heirs and hold an informal hearing to determine the proper distribution thereof. A memorandum covering the hearing shall be retained in the agency files showing the date of death of the decedent, the date of hearing, the persons notified and attending, the amount on hand, and the disposition thereof. In the disposition of such funds, the administrative law judge or Superintendent shall dispose of creditors' claims as provided in § 4.251. The Superintendent shall credit the balance, if any, to the legal heirs.

[36 FR 24814, Dec. 23, 1971] § 4.272 Omitted property.

(a) When, subsequent to the issuance of a decision under § 4.240 or § 4.296, it is found that trust property or interest therein belonging to a decedent has not been included in the inventory, the inventory can be modified either administratively by the Commissioner of the Bureau of Indian Af

fairs or by a modification order prepared by him for the administrative law judge's approval and signature to include such omitted property for distribution pursuant to the original decision. Copies of such modifications shall be furnished to the Superintendent and to all those persons who share in the estate.

(b) When the property to be included takes a different line of descent from that shown in the original decision, the Commissioner of the Bureau of Indian Affairs shall notify the administrative law judge who shall proceed to hold hearings if necessary and shall issue a decision under § 4.240. The record of any such proceeding shall be lodged with the title plant designated under § 4.236(b).

[36 FR 7186, Apr. 15, 1971; 36 FR 7588, Apr. 22, 1971]

§ 4.273 Improperly included property.

(a) When subsequent to a decision under § 4.240 or § 4.296, it is found that property has been improperly included in the inventory of an estate, the inventory shall be modified to eliminate such property. A petition for modification may be filed by the Superintendent of the Agency where the property is located, or by any party in interest.

(b) The administrative law judge shall review the record of the title upon which the modification is to be based, and enter an appropriate decision. If the decision is entered without

a

hearing, the administrative law judge shall give notice of his action to all parties whose rights are adversely affected allowing them 60 days in which to show cause why the decision should not then become final.

(c) Where appropriate the administrative law judge may conduct a hearing at any stage of the modification proceeding. Any such hearing shall be scheduled and conducted in accordance with the rules of this subpart. The administrative law judge shall enter a final decision based on his findings, modifying or refusing to modify the property inventory and his decision shall become final at the end of 60 days from the date it is mailed unless a notice of appeal is filed by an aggrieved party within such period. Notice of entry of the decision shall be given in accordance with § 4.240(b).

(d) A party aggrieved by the administrative law judge's decision may appeal to the Board pursuant to the procedures in §§ 4.291-4.297.

(e) The record of all proceedings shall be lodged with the title plant designated under § 4.236(b).

[36 FR 24814, Dec. 23, 1971]

§ 4.274 Distribution of estates.

(a) Unless the Superintendent shall have received a petition for rehearing filed pursuant to the requirements of § 4.241(a) or a copy of a notice of appeal filed pursuant to the requirements of § 4.291(b), he shall pay allowed claims, distribute the estate, and take all other necessary action directed by the administrative law judge's final order.

(b) The Superintendent may not pay claims nor make distribution of an estate during the pendency of proceedings under § 4.241 or § 4.242 unless the administrative law judge orders otherwise in writing. The Board may, at any time, authorize the administrative law judge to issue interim orders for payment of claims or for partial distribution during the pendency of proceedings on appeal.

[36 FR 7186, Apr. 15, 1971, as amended at 36 FR 24814, Dec. 23, 1971]

MISCELLANEOUS

§ 4.280 Probate fees.

Upon a determination of the heirs to any trust or restricted Indian property of the value of $250 or more or to any allotment, or after approval of any will disposing of such trust or restricted property, the following fees shall be paid (a) by the heirs, or (b) by the beneficiaries under the will, or (c) from the estate of the decedent, or (d) from the proceeds of the sale of the allotment, or (e) from any trust funds belonging to the estate of the decedent:

[merged small][merged small][merged small][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors]
« PreviousContinue »