William James: In the Maelstrom of American Modernism : a Biography

Front Cover
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2007 - Biography & Autobiography - 622 pages
0 Reviews
The definitive biography of the fascinating William James, whose life and writing put an indelible stamp on psychology, philosophy, teaching, and religion -- on modernism itself

Pivotal member of the Metaphysical Club, author of The Varieties of Religious Experience, eldest sibling in the extraordinary James family, William emerges here as an immensely complex and curious man.

William James, ten years in the making, draws on a vast number of unpublished letters, journals, and family records to illuminate what James himself called the "buzzing blooming confusion" of his life. Richardson shows James struggling to achieve amid the domestic chaos and intellectual brilliance of his father, his brother Henry, and his sister Alice. There are portraits of James's early years as a student at the appallingly hidebound Harvard of the 1860s. And there are the harrowing suicidal episodes, after which James, still a young man, turns from depression to action with "a heave of will." Through impassioned scholarship, Richardson illuminates James's hugely influential works: the Varieties, Principles of Psychology, Talks to Teachers, and Pragmatism.

As a longtime professor James taught courage and risk-taking. He was W.E.B. Du Bois's adviser and teacher, and he told another of his students, Gertrude Stein, to reject nothing -- that rejecting anything was the beginning of the end for an intellectual. One of the great figures in mysticism, James coined the phrase "stream of consciousness."
 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

I
1
II
9
III
11
IV
17
V
24
VI
28
VII
33
VIII
41
LI
291
LII
299
LIII
301
LIV
310
LV
318
LVI
326
LVII
332
LVIII
339

IX
48
X
56
XI
65
XII
74
XIII
81
XIV
85
XV
94
XVI
101
XVII
104
XVIII
108
XIX
115
XX
117
XXI
123
XXII
128
XXIII
133
XXIV
139
XXV
141
XXVI
148
XXVII
153
XXVIII
161
XXIX
168
XXX
176
XXXI
183
XXXII
191
XXXIV
193
XXXV
199
XXXVI
203
XXXVII
211
XXXVIII
217
XXXIX
223
XL
230
XLI
236
XLII
240
XLIII
245
XLIV
253
XLV
257
XLVI
264
XLVII
268
XLVIII
275
XLIX
283
L
287
LIX
344
LX
349
LXI
354
LXII
357
LXIII
361
LXIV
366
LXV
372
LXVI
376
LXVII
380
LXVIII
385
LXIX
389
LXX
394
LXXI
398
LXXII
402
LXXIII
407
LXXIV
412
LXXV
419
LXXVI
424
LXXVII
428
LXXVIII
432
LXXIX
435
LXXX
439
LXXXI
444
LXXXII
446
LXXXIII
451
LXXXIV
456
LXXXV
459
LXXXVI
468
LXXXVII
474
LXXXVIII
477
LXXXIX
484
XC
489
XCI
491
XCII
497
XCIII
502
XCIV
506
XCV
510
XCVI
514
XCVII
521
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2007)

Prologue

He had not been sleeping well in Palo Alto all semester -- he suffered from angina and had recently been much troubled by gout -- and so William James was lying awake in bed a few minutes after five in the morning on April 18 when the great earthquake of 1906 struck. James was sixty-four, famous now as a teacher and for his work in psychology, philosophy, and religion. He was spending the year as a visiting professor at Stanford University, twenty- five miles south of San Francisco. His mission was to put Stanford on the map in philosophy.
Jesse Cook, a police sergeant on duty that morning in the San Francisco produce market, first noticed the horses panicking, then saw the earthquake start. "There was a deep rumble, deep and terrible," said Cook, "and then I could actually see it coming up Washington Street. The whole street was undulating. It was as if the waves of the ocean were coming toward me." John Barrett, city desk news editor of the Examiner, was already in his office when he heard "a long low moaning sound that set buildings dancing on their foundations." Barrett and his colleagues suddenly found themselves staggering. "It was as though the earth was slipping . . . away under our feet. There was a sickening sway, and we were all flat on our faces." Looking up, Barrett saw nearby buildings "caught up in a macabre jig . . .They swayed out into the street, then rocked back, only to repeat the movement with even more determination." James Hopper, a reporter for the Call, was home in his bed. He rushed to his window. "I heard the roar of bricks coming down," he wrote, "and at the same time saw a pale crescent moon in the green sky. The St Francis hotel was waving to and fro with a swing as violent and exaggerated as a tree in a tempest. Then the rear of my building, for three stories upward, fell. The mass struck a series of little wooden houses in the alley below. I saw them crash in like emptied eggs, the bricks passing through the roofs as though through tissue paper. I had this feeling of finality. This is death." Out in the streets, "trolley tracks were twisted, their wires down, wriggling like serpents, flashing blue sparks all the time." Barrett saw that "the street was gashed in any number of places. From some of the holes water was spurting; from others gas." Astonished guests in the Palace Hotel looked out one of its few intact windows and saw a woman in a nightgown carrying a baby by its legs, "as if it were a trussed turkey." In the first moments after the quake there was total silence. "The streets," Hopper recalled, "were full of people, half clad, disheveled, but silent, absolutely silent." In San Jose, south of Palo Alto, along the line of the rip, the buildings of the state asylum at Agnews collapsed with a roar heard for miles, killing a hundred people, including eighty-seven inmates. Some of the more violent survivors rushed about, attacking anyone who came near. A doctor suggested that since there was no longer any place to put them, they should be tied up. Attendants brought ropes and tied the inmates hand and foot to those (small) trees that had been left standing.
In Palo Alto the stone quadrangle at Stanford was wrecked. Fourteen buildings fell; the ceiling of the church collapsed. The botanical garden was torn up as if by a giant plow. A statue of Louis Agassiz fell out of its niche and plunged to the pavement below, where it was photographed with its head in the ground and its feet in the air. Stanford was still on Easter vacation. Almost all the students were gone. One, however, was staying on the fourth floor of Encina Hall, a large stone dormitory. He sprang out of bed but was instantly thrown off his feet. "Then, with an awful, sinister, grinding roar, everything gave way, and with chimneys, floorbeams, walls and all, he descended through the three lower stories of the building into the basement." The student, who later told all this to James, added that he had felt no fear at the time, though he had felt, "This is my end, this is my death." The first thing William James noticed, as he lay awake in bed in the apartment he shared with his wife, Alice, on the Stanford campus, was that "the bed [began] to waggle." He sat up, inadvertently, he said, then tried to get on his knees, but was thrown down on his face as the earthquake shook the room, "exactly as a terrier shakes a rat." In a short piece of writing about the quake, written twenty-three days later, James recalled that "everything that was on anything else slid off to the floor; over went bureau and chiffonier with a crash, as the fortissimo was reached, plaster cracked, an awful roaring noise seemed to fill the outer air, and in an instant all was still again, save the soft babble of human voices from far and near." The thing was over in forty-eight seconds. James''s firsttttt unthinking response to the quake was, he tells us, one of "glee," "admiration," "delight," and "welcome." He felt, he said, no sense of fear whatever. "Go it," I almost cried aloud, "and go it stronger." The Marcus Aurelius whom James admired, and who had prayed, "O Universe, I want what you want," could scarcely have improved on James''s unhesitating, fierce, joyful embrace of the awful force of nature. It was for James a moment of contact with elemental reality, like Thoreau''s outburst on top of Mount Katahdin, like Emerson''s opening the coffin of his young dead wife, or like the climax of Robert Browning''s poem "A Grammarian''s Funeral" (one of James''s favorites), in which the funeral procession of the outwardly unremarkable but deeply dedicated scholar -- whose patient work has ignited the renaissance of learning -- climbs from the valley of commonplace life to the heroic alpine heights where his spirit belongs: "Here -- here''s his place, where meteors shoot, clouds form, / Lightnings are loosened, / Stars come and go! Let joy break with the storm." James''s second response was to run to his wife''s room. Alice was unhurt, and had felt no fear either. Then James went with a young colleague, Lillien Martin, into the devastation of downtown San Francisco to search for her sister, who was also, it turned out, unhurt. James''s active sympathy and quick mobilization were characteristic, as was his third response to the event, which was to question everyone he saw about his or her feelings about the quake. His diary for the next day, April 19, says simply, "Talked earthquake all day." It was also entirely characteristic that he next wrote up and published a short account of the experience, in which he noted that it was almost impossible to avoid personifying the event, and that the disaster had called out the best energies of a great many people.
James''s care for his wife, his concern for his colleague, and his writing up what he learned seem usual enough; it is his initial, unexamined, unprompted response that opens a door for us. James possessed what has been called a "great experiencing nature"; he was astonishingly, even alarmingly, open to new experiences. A student of his noted that he was at times a reckless experimenter with all sorts of untested drugs and gasses.
This risk-taking, this avidity for the widest possible range of conscious experience, predisposed him to embrace things that many of us might find unsettling. It has been suggested that the earthquake experience was for James the near equivalent of a war experience. It may have been that, and it may have been even more than that. He no longer believed -- if he ever had -- in a fixed world built on a solid foundation. The earthquake was for him a hint of the real condition of things, the real situation. The earthquake revealed a world (like James''s own conception of consciousness) that was pure flux having nothing stable, permanent, or absolute in it.
James had four years to live after the earthquake of 1906, and his work was far from done. In 1909 he was still trying to make sense of some of his most challenging and sweeping ideas in a book called A Pluralistic Universe. Here he firmly rejects what he calls the "stagnant felicity of the absolute''s own perfection." He rejects, that is, the idea that everything will finally be seen to fit together in one grand, interlocked, necessary, benevolent system. For James there are many centers of the universe, many points of view, many systems, much conflict and evil, as well as much beauty and good. It is, he said, "a universe of eaches." James''s universe is unimaginably rich, infinitely full and variegated, unified only in that every bit of it is alive. Citing the German thinker Gustav Fechner for protective intellectual cover -- a common maneuver for the canny enthusiast whose intoxicated admiration extended outward to writers and thinkers in all directions -- James speaks approvingly of "the daylight view of the world." This is the view that "the whole universe in its different spans and wave-lengths, exclusions and envelopments, is everywhere alive and conscious." In Pragmatism, published a year after the quake, he wrote, "I firmly disbelieve, myself, that our human experience is the highest form of experience extant in the universe. I believe rather that we stand in much the same relation to the whole of the universe as our canine and feline pets do to the whole of human life. They inhabit our drawing rooms and libraries. They take part in scenes of whose significance they have no inkling. They are merely tangent to curves of history the beginnings and ends and forms of which pass wholly beyond their ken. So we are tangent to the wider life of things." James''s understanding of how each of us operates in the world is like George Eliot''s description of the pier glass and the candle in Middlemarch. "Your pier glass or extensive surface of polished steel," Eliot writes, "rubbed by a housemaid, will be minutely and multitudinously scratched in all directions; but place n

Bibliographic information