Nomination of John Agresto: Hearings Before the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, Second Session, on the Nomination of John Agresto to be Archivist of the United States, August 13 and September 9, 10, 1986
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1987 - Archivists - 624 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
additional Administration affirmative action agency Agresto American appointment Archivist asked Assistant Association authority basis believe Chairman Civil Committee concern Congress Constitution contract cost Council Court decision Department direct Director discussion documents Education EEOC employees employment equal executive experience facilities fact Federal funds goals going grant groups hearing hiring Humanities important increase independent interest issue John Agresto letter Library matter meet Michigan million minority National Archives nomination Office operations opportunity organization person political position Postal Service preservation President Presidential professional projects qualifications questions race recommendations records regarding request responsibility scholars selection Senator EAGLETON Senator STEVENS serve Society staff statement Street submit Thank tion understand United University Washington White House
Page 5 - The Contractor warrants that no person or selling agency has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee...
Page 1 - As used in this certification, the term "segregated facilities" means any waiting rooms, work areas, rest rooms and wash rooms, restaurants and other eating areas, time clocks, locker rooms and other storage or dressing areas, parking lots, drinking fountains, recreation or entertainment areas, transportation, and housing facilities provided for employees which are segregated by explicit directive or are in fact segregated on the basis of race, color, religion or national origin, because of habit,...
Page 346 - Nothing contained in this title shall be interpreted to require any employer, employment agency, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee subject to this title to grant preferential treatment to any individual or to any group because of the race, color, religion, sex, or national origin...
Page 272 - Clarence Mitchell, director of the Washington Bureau of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.
Page 156 - As there is a degree of depravity in mankind which requires a certain degree of circumspection and distrust: So there are other qualities in human nature, which justify a certain portion of esteem and confidence.
Page 347 - The guarantee of equal protection cannot mean one thing when applied to one individual and something else when applied to a person of another color. If both are not accorded the same protection, then it is not equal.
Page 5 - ... an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee. excepting bona fide employees or bona fide' established commercial or selling agencies maintained by the Contractor for the purpose of securing business. For breach or violation of this warranty the Government shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or In Its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such commission, percentage,...
Page 348 - We have never approved a classification that aids persons perceived as members of relatively victimized groups at the expense of other innocent individuals in the absence of judicial, legislative, or administrative findings of constitutional or statutory violations.
Page 458 - The President The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President: To the Vice President: The Vice President The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr.
Page 347 - It should be noted, to begin with, that all legal restrictions which curtail the civil rights of a single racial group are immediately suspect. That is not to say that all such restrictions are unconstitutional. It is to say that courts must subject them to the most rigid scrutiny.