Hidden fields
Books Books
" California is not the owner of the three-mile marginal belt along its coast, and that the Federal Government rather than the state has paramount rights in and power over that belt, an incident to which is full dominion over the resources of the soil under... "
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act Amendments: Hearings ... 90-2, on S ... - Page 264
by United States. Congress. Senate. Interior and Insular Affairs - 1968 - 357 pages
Full view - About this book

Bulletin of the Pan American Union, Volume 82

Pan American Union - America - 1948 - 708 pages
...following words: "California is not the owner of the three-mile marginal belt along its coast, and . . . the Federal Government rather than the State has paramount rights in and power over th; belt, an incident to which is full dominie over the resources of the soil under tl water area,...
Full view - About this book

The Texas Outlook, Volume 32

Education - 1916 - 612 pages
...Supreme Court held that "California is not the owner of the three-mile marginal belt along its coast, and that the federal government rather than the state...of the soil under that water area, including oil." The majority opinion in the case states: "The United States here asserts rights in two capacities transcending...
Full view - About this book

United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ..., Volume 332

United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - Courts - 1948 - 962 pages
...reasons we have stated that California is not the owner of the three-mile marginal belt along its coast, and that the Federal Government rather than the state...rights in and power over that belt, an incident to -*1 Bull. No. 321, Dept. of Interior, Geological Survey. 19 Opinion of the Court. which is full dominion...
Full view - About this book

United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ..., Volume 332

United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1948 - 968 pages
...reasons we have stated that California is not the owner of the three-mile marginal belt along its coast, and that the Federal Government rather than the state...rights in and power over that belt, an incident to 21 Bull. No. 321, Dept. of Interior, Geological Survey. 19 Opinion of the Court. which is full dominion...
Full view - About this book

Title to Submerged Lands Beneath Tidal and Navigable Waters: Hearings Before ...

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - Mineral resources in submerged lands - 1948 - 352 pages
...there is to it. • Senator DONNELL. Incidentally, the Court, immediately following this language, that the Federal Government rather than the State has paramount rights in and power over that belt, says this, does it not: * * * an incident to which is full dominion over the resources of the Boil...
Full view - About this book

Title to Submerged Lands Beneath Tidal and Navigable Waters: Joint Hearings ...

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - Marine mineral resources - 1948 - 1722 pages
...reasons we have stated th California is not the owner of the 3-mile marginal belt along its coast, and tt the Federal Government rather than the State has paramount rights in and po\v over thut belt an incident to which is full dominion over the resources of s under that water...
Full view - About this book

Hearings, Reports and Prints of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - Administrative procedure - 1948 - 1738 pages
...vested in California. Mr. DANIEL. Yes, sir. Senator DON NELL. On the other hand, we have a holding that the Federal Government rather than the State has paramount rights in mcl power over that belt, incident to which is, as the Court says, full lommion over the resources...
Full view - About this book

Title to Submerged Lands Beneath Tidal and Navigable Water: Joint Hearings ...

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1948 - 1794 pages
...not vested in California. Mr. DANIEL. Yes, sir. Senator DONNELL. On the other hand, we have a holding that the Federal Government rather than the State has paramount rights in ind power over that belt, incident to which is, as the Court says, full dominion over the resources...
Full view - About this book

Conservation and Control of Submerged Coastal Lands and of Lands Beneath ...

United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1949 - 238 pages
...lands. The Court decided "that California is not the owner of the 3-mile marginal belt along its chast, and that the Federal Government rather than the State...of the soil under that water area, including oil" (332 US 38-39). On October 27, 1947, the Court entered a decree which adjudged that — "1. The United...
Full view - About this book

Submerged Lands

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs - Petroleum - 1950 - 392 pages
...among other things, "that California ls not the owner of the three-mile marginal belt along its coast, and that the Federal Government rather than the state...and power over that belt, an incident to which is the full dominion over the resources of the soil under that water area, including oil." and Whereas...
Full view - About this book




  1. My library
  2. Help
  3. Advanced Book Search
  4. Download EPUB
  5. Download PDF