...a concept as the power to protect 'domestic security.' " Id. at 313-14. The Court emphasized that: "The price of lawful public dissent must not be a...of subjection to an unchecked surveillance power. Nor must the fear of unauthorized official eavesdropping deter vigorous citizen dissent and discussion...

...domestic security interest the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. . . . The price of lawful public dissent must not be a dread...of subjection to an unchecked surveillance power. Nor must the fear of unauthorized official eavesdropping deter vigorous citizen dissent and discussion...

...stated well by Justice Lewis Powell in a more recent decision ( the 1972 wiretap case ) , saying : The price of lawful public dissent must not be a dread...of subjection to an unchecked surveillance power. Nor must the fear of unauthorized official eavesdropping deter vigorous citizen dissent and discussion...

...official surveillance may be those suspected of unorthodoxy in their political beliefs." He added, "The price of lawful public dissent must not be a...of subjection to an unchecked surveillance power." The reassurance stems from the independent judgment of a neutral and detached magistrate who determines...

...was stated well by Justice Lewis Powell in a more recent decision (the 11)72 wiretap case), saying: The price of lawful public dissent must not be a dread of subjection to an unchecked surveillance i»ower. Nor must the fear of unauthorized official eavesdropping deter vigorous citizen dissent and...

...does not become an excuse for the government to suppress or punish constitutionally-protected speech : "The price of lawful public dissent must not be a...of subjection to an unchecked surveillance power. Nor must the fear of unauthorized official eavesdropping deter vigorous citizen dissent and discussion...

...domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. . . . The price of lawful public dissent must not be a dread...of subjection to an unchecked surveillance power. Nor must the fear of unauthorized official eavesdropping deter vigorous citizen dissent and discussion...

...near future. In the Keith decision, Justice Powell, writing for a unanimous Court, declared that : The price of lawful public dissent must not be a dread...of subjection to an unchecked surveillance power. Nor must the fear of unauthorized official eavesdropping deter vigorous citizen dissent and discussion...

...rights activists to be a clear and present danger to the structure or existence of the Government." " The price of lawful public dissent must not be a dread...of subjection to an unchecked surveillance power. Nor must the fear of unauthorized official eavesdropping deter vigorous citizen dissent and discussion...

...rights activists to be a clear and present danger to the structure or existence of the Government." " The price of lawful public dissent must not be a dread...of subjection to an unchecked surveillance power. Nor must the fear of unauthorized official eavesdropping deter vigorous citizen dissent and discussion...