What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
ACSI action activities acts agencies agents American appears approval Armed Forces Army Assistant associations attached Attorney authorized base believe bill Chairman Chief civil disturbance civilian collection command Committee concerning conducted constitutional continue Counsel Court criminal dated demonstrations Department of Defense developed DIRC Directive discussed disorders DoD Directive domestic effort Ervin exception Executive fact Federal files groups indicated individuals inspection intelligence interest investigative involved issue June Justice law enforcement letter liaison limited March matters meeting memo memorandum military mission National Guard noted Office operations organizations period personnel persons policies political prepared President problem Program prohibited question received record reference regulation relating representative request responsibilities retained retention Secretary of Defense Senator Service situation specific Staff statement Subcommittee surveillance Team threat tion troops United violence Washington
Page 49 - Inviolability of privacy in group association may in many circumstances be indispensable to preservation of freedom of association, particularly where a group espouses dissident beliefs.
Page 36 - ... is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or (2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws. In any situation covered by clause ( 1 ) the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws...
Page 87 - Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than two years or both.
Page 145 - Welfare; the Secretary of Defense; the Secretary of the Treasury; the Secretary of Commerce...
Page 50 - Nevertheless, after declaring that the "security of one's privacy against arbitrary intrusion by the police" is "implicit in 'the concept of ordered liberty' and as such enforceable against the States through the Due Process Clause,
Page 87 - Whenever the President considers it necessary to use the militia or the armed forces under this chapter, he shall, by proclamation, immediately order the insurgents to disperse and retire peaceably to their abodes within a limited time.
Page 139 - Acquisition of Information Concerning Persons and Organizations not Affiliated With the Department of Defense...
Page 234 - NOW, THEREFORE, I, DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER, President of the United States, under and by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and statutes of the United States, including Chapter 15 of Title 10 of the United States Code, particularly Sections 332, 333 and 334 thereof, do command all persons engaged in such obstruction of justice to cease and desist therefrom, and to disperse forthwith.
Page 92 - History abundantly documents the tendency of Government — however benevolent and benign its motives — to view with suspicion those who most fervently dispute its policies. Fourth Amendment protections become the more necessary when the targets of official surveillance may be those suspected of unorthodoxy in their political beliefs. The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security.
Page 50 - The price of lawful public dissent must not be a dread of subjection to an unchecked surveillance power. Nor must the fear of unauthorized official eavesdropping deter vigorous citizen dissent and discussion of Government action in private conversation. For private dissent, no less than open public discourse, is essential to our free society.