Realining Regional Boundaries of Certain Federal Agencies: Hearing Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, Ninety-first Congress, First Session. May 8, 1969, Volumes 74-77
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Operations. Executive and Legislative Reorganization Subcommittee
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1969 - Administrative agencies - 67 pages
Studies administrative regional boundary realignments proposed for DOL, HEW, HUD, OEO and SBA.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action administration agencies appear authority believe Bolling Brown Budget building Bureau capitals central Chairman Charlottesville Colorado committee communities concern CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Congressman consideration cost decentralization decision delegation Denver Department Development district Economic Education effective efficiency effort employees ERLENBORN established facilities fact factors Federal Federal agencies Federal Government field five follows geographic going Government greater Health hearing HOLIFIELD hope House HUGHES Idaho important interest involved Iowa Kansas City Kentucky letters LIBRARY OF CONGRESS live major March March 27 metropolitan miles Missouri Montana move nearer Nebraska needs North Dakota Operations opportunity Philadelphia population possible present President problems programs proposed questions reason record reference regional boundaries regional center regional offices relocation represent result ROSENTHAL Senator served South space statement subcommittee Thank thing tion transportation Urban Virginia Washington Welfare White House
Page 7 - Secretary that its standards are no less comprehensive than the Federal interagency day care requirements as approved by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, the Office of Economic Opportunity, and the Department of Labor on September 23, 1968.
Page 16 - We are also exploring the prospects for utilizing this technique in the opportunity industrialization centers program currently being funded by the Departments of Labor, and Health, Education, and Welfare, and the Office of Economic Opportunity.
Page 42 - The first of these steps was the establishment of a common pattern of regional boundaries and headquarters for the Department of Labor, the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Office of Economic Opportunity, and the Small Business Administration.
Page 38 - ... of that community. We are most happy to hear you, Senator Boggs. STATEMENT OF HON. J. CALEB BOGGS, US SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF DELAWARE; ACCOMPANIED BY ROBERT MATTHEW BECKMAN OF HAFFER & BECKMAN, WASHINGTON, DC; AND DANIEL GINTY, MANAGER OF THE GREATER WILMINGTON AIRPORT Senator BOGGS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I am most grateful for the opportunity to appear before this distinguished committee. I am here because I feel that, in your consideration of the adequacy of trunkline service to medium-sized...
Page 9 - Watershed ; and be it further Resolved, That the Secretary of State be instructed to transmit, a copy of this resolution to the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare and to each Member of the New Hampshire delegation in the Congress of the United States.
Page 9 - I hereby certify that the above concurrent resolution originated in the senate, and was adopted by that body February 28, 1957.
Page 64 - A REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS FROM THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Mr. Chairman, I want to thank you for...
Page 63 - FROM THE STATE OF vIRGINIA Mr. Chairman. I appreciate the opportunity to make this statement in support of my bill.
Page 16 - ... viability of the ABM Treaty is key to further reductions in strategic offensive forces under START II and START III. I appreciate this further opportunity to clarify the record in this area. Sincerely, BILL CLINTON. US CONGRESS, COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, WASHINGTON, DC, August 14, 1998. THE PRESIDENT The "White House Washington, DC. DEAR MR. PRESIDENT: Thank you for your letters of November 21, 1997 and May 21, 1998, responding to inquiries from me and Chairman Helms about succession...