Nomination of William M. Diefenderfer III: Hearing Before the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred First Congress, First Session on Nomination of William M. Diefenderfer to be Deputy Director, Office of Management and Budget, May 6, 1989, Volume 4U.S. Government Printing Office, 1989 - 70 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 29
Page 2
... fact . When all else fails - when intellect and persuasion and friendship and loyalty and his wife Sandy and his children and everything else fails - please be advised that he is a brown belt in judo . And in his early 30's , he was ...
... fact . When all else fails - when intellect and persuasion and friendship and loyalty and his wife Sandy and his children and everything else fails - please be advised that he is a brown belt in judo . And in his early 30's , he was ...
Page 8
... fact , give us their personal views . Now , I would appreciate any comments you can make about what you see as the probable policy , how it will be executed and whether it differs from that which we have followed here for some time ...
... fact , give us their personal views . Now , I would appreciate any comments you can make about what you see as the probable policy , how it will be executed and whether it differs from that which we have followed here for some time ...
Page 9
... facts , and he's the scientist . The title of the article is , " Scientist Says Budget Office Altered His Testimony . ' 99 Let me read just a little bit from it . " The White House Office of Management and Budget has changed the text of ...
... facts , and he's the scientist . The title of the article is , " Scientist Says Budget Office Altered His Testimony . ' 99 Let me read just a little bit from it . " The White House Office of Management and Budget has changed the text of ...
Page 10
... facts of whether the testimony was altered in the manner suggested . We are obviously going to find that out . And if , in fact , there was an attempt to alter or change scientific fact or conclu- sion , it would not be a policy which I ...
... facts of whether the testimony was altered in the manner suggested . We are obviously going to find that out . And if , in fact , there was an attempt to alter or change scientific fact or conclu- sion , it would not be a policy which I ...
Page 13
... facts is one that we would all agree with . However , there is a fine line between conclusions from facts and policy ... fact , we do not have the right to alter facts . But the conclusions from those facts are something that is subject ...
... facts is one that we would all agree with . However , there is a fine line between conclusions from facts and policy ... fact , we do not have the right to alter facts . But the conclusions from those facts are something that is subject ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
activities Administration agencies Answer areas asked assure biennial budgeting bill billion budget office budget process Chairman GLENN Chief Financial Officer Circular confirmed Congress coordination cost Cost Accounting Standards deficit reduction Deputy Director Dickinson College DIEFENDERFER Director Darman Director of OMB Employer Executive Associate Director executive branch Executive Order fact financial management global warming going Government-wide Hansen hearing honoraria implement improve Information and Regulatory interest involved issues legislation Management and Budget management functions ment nominated Office of Management OFPP OIRA OMB's management oversight Paperwork Reduction Act PCIE planning President President's problems program evaluation proposed Question recusal reform regulations Regulatory Affairs request responsibilities role Senator LEVIN Senator PACKWOOD Senator SASSER Senator STEVENS staff statement testimony Thank things tion Title/Description of Job tive Trust Fund U.S. Senate unified budget United States Senate views
Popular passages
Page 51 - ... particular matter in which, to his knowledge, he, his spouse, minor child, partner, organization in which he is serving as officer, director, trustee, partner or employee, or any person or organization with whom he is negotiating or has any arrangement concerning prospective employment, has a financial interest — Shall be fined not more than $10,000, or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
Page 51 - ... and receives in advance a written determination made by such official that the interest is not so substantial as to be deemed likely to affect the integrity of the services which the Government may expect from such officer or employee...
Page 50 - Acts affecting a personal financial interest (a) Except as permitted by subsection (b) hereof, whoever, being an officer or employee of the executive branch of the United States Government, of any independent agency of the United States, or of the District of Columbia...
Page 63 - Federal information policies and practices; (5) to ensure that automatic data processing, telecommunications, and other information technologies are acquired and used by the Federal Government...
Page 51 - Government employee, participates personally and substantially as a Government officer or employee, through decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation, the rendering of advice, investigation, or otherwise, in a judicial or other proceeding, application, request for a ruling or other determination, contract, claim, controversy, charge, accusation, arrest, or other particular matter in which, to his knowledge, he, his spouse, minor child, partner, organization in which he is serving as officer,...
Page 42 - Member, upon leaving office, becomes a registered lobbyist under the Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act of 1946 or any successor statute, or is employed or retained by such a registered lobbyist for the purpose of influencing legislation...
Page 51 - ... receives in advance a written determination made by such official that the interest is not so substantial as to be deemed likely to affect the integrity of the services which the Government may expect from such officer or employee, or (2) if , by general rule or regulation published in the Federal Register, the financial interest has been exempted from the requirements of clause (1) hereof as being too remote or too inconsequential to affect the integrity of Government officers' or employees
Page 51 - Shall be fined not more than $10,000, or imprisoned not more than two years, or both. (b) Subsection (a) hereof shall not apply (1) if the officer or employee first advises the Government official responsible for appointment to his position of the nature and circumstances of the judicial or other proceeding, application, request for a ruling or other determination, contract, claim, controversy, charge, accusation, arrest, or other particular matter and makes full disclosure of the financial interest...
Page 64 - OMB also examines the extent to which related statutory, budgetary, and board policy mandates may be driving such paperwork requirements. In short, proper review of paperwork burdens, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act, must of necessity include a careful understanding of the underlying source of the paperwork requirement. Similarly, the requirements for executive oversight of regulatory planning and review set forth in Executive Orders No.
Page 7 - Committee rules further require that the nominee be under oath while testifying on all matters relating to his suitability for office, including the policies and programs which he will pursue while in that position.