 | United States. Department of Agriculture - Agricultural laws and legislation - 1993 - 640 pages
...court must first determine "whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end...to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress." 467 US at 842-43, 104 S.Ct. at 2781. The Supreme Court went on to find that "[i]f, however, the court... | |
 | United States. Department of Agriculture - Agricultural laws and legislation - 1993 - 248 pages
...Trade Comm'n, 476 US at 454, 106 S.Ct. at 2015). Our review of an agency's construction of a statute must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress. Chevron US-A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 US 837, 842-43, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 2781-82, 81 L.Ed.2d... | |
 | United States. Employees' Compensation Appeals Board - Employers' liability - 1995 - 1092 pages
...includes determining first whether "Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end...unambiguously expressed intent of Congress." Chevron, 467 at 842—43. If the congressional intent, as expressed in the statute, is ambiguous or nonexistent,... | |
 | United States. Employees' Compensation Appeals Board - Employers' liability - 1996 - 834 pages
...includes determining first whether "Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end...court, as well as the agency, must give effect to the unambigContinued In the instant case, appellant requested in 1978 a lump-sum payment. He was advised,... | |
 | United States. Tax Court - Taxation - 1997 - 798 pages
...purposes of sections 419 and 419A.9 If the intent of Congress on a matter is clear, then the Secretary must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress. Chevron USA, Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 US 837, 842 (1983). If, however, the statute is... | |
 | Alfred C. Aman, Alfred C. Aman (Jr.) - History - 1992 - 236 pages
...First, always, is the question whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end...to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress. If, however, the court determines Congress has not directly addressed the precise question at issue,... | |
 | United States. Federal Communications Commission - Telecommunication - 1996 - 560 pages
...[fjirst, always, is the question whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end...to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress. . . . if the statute is silent or ambiguous with respect to the specific issue, the question for the... | |
 | United States. Federal Communications Commission - Telecommunication - 1998 - 818 pages
...principle of statutory construction that when congressional intent, as reflected in the statutory language, is clear "that is the end of the matter; for the court,...unambiguously expressed intent of Congress." Chevron USA v. Natural Res. Def. Council, 467 US 837, 842-43 (1985). Here, the plain language of Section 309(1)(1)... | |
 | United States. Federal Communications Commission - Telecommunication - 2000 - 788 pages
...that if statutory language is clear, an agency has no discretion to change the meaning, but instead "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress." Chevron USA, Inc. v. NRDC, 467 US 837, 843 (1984). Here, however, iTongress did not define the term "filed," and... | |
 | United States. Social Security Administration - Social security - 188 pages
...well established: We first ask "whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end...unambiguously expressed intent of Congress." Chevron USA Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 US 837, 842-843, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 2781, 81 L.Ed.2d... | |
| |
When a court reviews an agency's construction of the statute which it administers, it is confronted with two questions. First, always, is the question whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the intent of Congress is... 
