What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action additional administrative Agency alleged amended analysis appeal applicable argues argument assessed authority BACT Bil-Dry Board Brief burden changes citing claims complaint compliance conclude considered contained continued cost Count decision denied determination discussed documents effective emissions Environmental EPA Enforcement establish evidence facility fact factors failed federal FIFRA filed final further hazardous hearing IDEM increase Initial Decision issue labeling lead limit material matter ment motion operation Order parties penalty period permit pesticide Petition petitioners Plan plant pollutants potential Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's prior proposed raised reasons record regarding Region registration regulations replacement request requirements respect response result Rogers rules specific standards submitted tanks term testimony tion TVA's Union Unit violation waste
Page 76 - When a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided in this rule, an adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of his pleading, but his response, by affidavits or as otherwise provided in this rule must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial. If he does not so respond, summary judgment, if appropriate, shall be entered against him.
Page 342 - Terms with respect to which the confirmatory memoranda of the parties agree or which are otherwise set forth in a writing intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement with respect to such terms as are included therein may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement but may be explained or supplemented.
Page 153 - When a court reviews an agency's construction of the statute which it administers, it is confronted with two questions. First, always, is the question whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end of the matter, for the court, as well as the agency, must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress.
Page 53 - UNREASONABLE ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT. — The term "unreasonable adverse effects on the environment" means any unreasonable risk to man or the environment, taking into account the economic, social, and environmental costs and benefits of the use of any pesticide.
Page 290 - ... any adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided should the proposal be implemented, - alternatives to the proposed action, - the relationship between local short-term uses of man's environment and the maintenance and enhancement of longterm productivity, and - any irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources which would be involved in the proposed action should it be implemented.
Page 343 - A usage of trade is any practice or method of dealing having such regularity of observance in a place, vocation or trade as to justify an expectation that it will be observed with respect to the transaction in question.
Page 74 - If, on a motion asserting the defense numbered (6) to dismiss for failure of the pleading to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, matters outside the pleading are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Rule 56, and all parties shall be given reasonable opportunity to present all material made pertinent to such a motion by Rule 56.
Page 598 - ... (a) cause or significantly contribute to an increase in mortality or an increase in serious irreversible or incapacitating reversible illness; or (b) pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, or disposed of, or otherwise managed.
Page 239 - Any national secondary ambient air quality standard prescribed, under subsection (a) shall specify a level of air quality the attainment and maintenance of which in the judgment of the Administrator, based on such criteria, is requisite to protect the public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effects associated with the presence of such air pollutant in the ambient air.