Uranium Enrichment Program: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Energy and Power of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, First Session, April 8, 1987 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
amendment April 20 Atomic Energy Act AVLIS believe budget Chairman Committee competitive Cong CONGRESS LIBRARY CONGRESS THE LIBRARY continue corporation Court criteria debt defense Department of Energy DOE uranium enrichment DOE's enrichment domestic uranium industry electric utilities enriched uranium enrichment contract enrichment plants facilities Federal income taxes gas centrifuge gaseous diffusion gaseous diffusion plants GCEP Government Honorable Philip House of Representatives increase investment issues legislation LIBRARY OF CONGRES LIBRARY OF CONGRESS long-term LONGENECKER ment million SWU's minimum bill nuclear fuel industry nuclear utilities Oak Ridge operating percent production proposal Question ratepayers rates recover reduce Representatives April 20 request requirements restructuring revenues Rossin Senate separative work unit special nuclear materials Steffy suppliers supply taxpayers Tennessee Valley Tennessee Valley Authority termination TVA demand charge TVA's unrecovered costs uranium enrichment enterprise uranium enrichment program uranium producers Urenco viable domestic uranium
Popular passages
Page 230 - Commission issues regulations setting forth the scope, procedure, and limitations of the authority of each such board; b. establish by rule, regulation, or order, such standards and instructions to govern the possession and use of special nuclear material, source material, and byproduct material as the Commission may deem necessary or desirable to promote the common defense and security or to protect health or to minimize danger to life or property; c.
Page 242 - That the Commission, to the extent necessary to assure the maintenance of a viable domestic uranium industry...
Page 247 - ... but the latter have the limited and specific purpose of providing funds for authorized programs. When voting on appropriations measures, legislators are entitled to operate under the assumption that the funds will be devoted to purposes which are lawful and not for any purpose forbidden. Without such an assurance, every appropriations measure would be pregnant with prospects of altering substantive legislation, repealing by implication any prior statute which might prohibit the expenditure.
Page 163 - Subcommittee on Energy and Power Committee on Energy and Commerce US House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Mr.
Page 77 - Steffy has been expressly recognized by the courts as such provisions have consistently been held to be enforceable in accordance with the contractual terms. These court opinions have involved TVA contractual arrangements as well as those of other power suppliers. This was examined by the court as it made a detailed analysis of prior precedents and authorities in ruling in favor of TVA in Mobil Oil Corp. v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 387 F. Supp. 498 (ND Ala. 1974). The plaintiff in that case, a...
Page 243 - Commission shall establish criteria in writing setting forth the terms and conditions under which services provided under this subsection shall be made available including the extent to which such services will be made available for source or special nuclear material of foreign origin intended for use in a utilization facility within or under the jurisdiction of the United States...
Page 163 - EEI is the national association of investor-owned electric companies. Its members serve approximately 73 percent of all ultimate electricity customers in the nation.
Page 243 - Commission, to the extent necessary to assure the maintenance of a viable domestic uranium industry, shall not offer such services for source or special nuclear materials of foreign origin intended for use in a utilization facility within or under the jurisdiction of the United States.
Page 14 - GCEP and centrifuge development contracts should be completed and the GCEP project officially closed out by September 1987. DOE is currently seeking alternative uses for the GCEP facilities. The Department currently operates two gaseous diffusion plants (GDPs) in Paducah, Kentucky, and Portsmouth, Ohio. In November 1986, operation of both plants was consolidated under a single contractor, Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Incorporated (MMES) . Utilizing one contractor for both GDPs is expected to reduce...